Quick Fix Game 71: 5D Shard Game With Multiverse Time Travel*

[Kasimir he/him]

Archer welcome back

In honour of our esteemed GM

---

Ias sighed and wondered if he had made the right decision in joining Dawntrue's priesthood.

All of them, corralled up because someone had undoubtedly committed heresy and murdered their god. He should've gone for Redcross, he thought crossly, even though Redcross was known to be a bit of a character. At least Dawntrue had particularly good opinions on salmon, having adopted the entire pond as his sacred animal.

Of course, Ias was certain the heretics would also do great harm to his god's salmon.

That was not to be brooked.

Edited May 5, 2024 by Kasimir

[Cash67]

Gosh dang it Wiz never showed up…

Poke vote activate! Spark of Hope

[Through the Living Hope]

That’s not very nice Cash.

Aeternum

[RoyalBeeMage he/him]

3 minutes ago, Spark of Hope said:

That’s not very nice Cash.

Aeternum

the raven has landed! I think that cash was only bringing you here.

[Cash67]

1 hour ago, Spark of Hope said:

That’s not very nice Cash.

Aeternum

Agreed. Hence why I did it. 

 

1 hour ago, RoyalBeeMage said:

the raven has landed! I think that cash was only bringing you here.

And yep that’s pretty much the point of poke votes. Hence I will be doing this:

Spark of Hope 

Wierdo

[RoyalBeeMage he/him]

Just now, Cash67 said:

Agreed. Hence why I did it. 

 

And yep that’s pretty much the point of poke votes. Hence I will be doing this:

Spark of Hope 

Wierdo

ahh. i might change my vote when they get back online.

[Archer he/him]

Royal Bee Mage

[RoyalBeeMage he/him]

Just now, Archer said:

Royal Bee Mage

can i ask why?

Quote

i have to go now. 

 

[Cash67]

11 minutes ago, Archer said:

Royal Bee Mage

*votes*
*refuses to elaborate*
*leaves*
 

 

11 minutes ago, RoyalBeeMage said:

can i ask why?

 

Behold the art of the Poke Vote (TM). Eliciting reactions one cast at a time!

[Archer he/him]

13 minutes ago, Cash67 said:

yep that’s pretty much the point of poke votes

Shh I can invent reasons. In response to this you said:

12 minutes ago, RoyalBeeMage said:

ahh. i might change my vote when they get back online

Which was an early fold. You seem conflict adverse, RBM

*

"Phewie! Your Breath stinks."
The guard continued to block the doorway with his shield.
Double, true to his name, doubled down. "If I were you, I'd swap it for another one. I'll let you offload it onto me, for a price."
"Move along."
"You've seen though me! I'd do it as an act of charity."
"You must remain until the investigation is concluded."
Double sighed. "Fine. You have a deal. I'll catch the killer and you give me your Breath. No take backs!" 

*

And an SE welcome to you, Kidpen! The D1 exe makes 'killing' folks more palpable, so I have no reservations today. 

[Aeoryi she/her]

hi hello all

The Unknown Ajah

~activates poke vote strats~

[Aeternum]

Votes so far:

1 for Archer (Kas)

1 for Aet (Spark of Hope) how dare you smh

1 for Raven (Royal)

1 for Weirdo (Cash)

1 for Kidpen (Archer)

1 for TUA (Aeo)

 

2 hours ago, Spark of Hope said:

That’s not very nice Cash.

Aeternum

THAT'S not very nice, Spark of Hope. What's your reasoning, hm?? 

On that note, it's clearly Aeoryi . Once evil, always evil smh. Oh wait...

*also votes, doesn't elaborate, and leaves*

Ok see you in several hours!

[Kasimir he/him]

1 hour ago, Cash67 said:

*votes*
*refuses to elaborate*
*leaves*

Add a *screams* here and it may well be a husky meme.

1 hour ago, Archer said:

And an SE welcome to you, Kidpen! The D1 exe makes 'killing' folks more palpable, so I have no reservations today. 

How do you feel about achieving vampiric immortality and godhood?

Edited to add:

1 hour ago, Archer said:

Which was an early fold. You seem conflict adverse, RBM

Is there a reason you're tacitly ascribing a positive read valence, however mild, to conflict avoidance?

Edited May 5, 2024 by Kasimir

[Aeoryi she/her]

Aeternum is likely villager for This post since it's out of their elim range (meta) imo.

 

 

 

[The Unknown Medallion he/him]

2 hours ago, Cash67 said:

*votes*
*refuses to elaborate*
*leaves*
 

 

Behold the art of the Poke Vote (TM). Eliciting reactions one cast at a time!

I'm filing for improper use of trademark. Poke votes are a work of art (which you yourself mention) and therefore are under the domain of copyright. They were also in use long before you got your hands on it. Some would even say it's in the public domain at this point.

2 hours ago, Archer said:

Shh I can invent reasons. In response to this you said:

Which was an early fold. You seem conflict adverse, RBM

*

"Phewie! Your Breath stinks."
The guard continued to block the doorway with his shield.
Double, true to his name, doubled down. "If I were you, I'd swap it for another one. I'll let you offload it onto me, for a price."
"Move along."
"You've seen though me! I'd do it as an act of charity."
"You must remain until the investigation is concluded."
Double sighed. "Fine. You have a deal. I'll catch the killer and you give me your Breath. No take backs!" 

*

And an SE welcome to you, Kidpen! The D1 exe makes 'killing' folks more palpable, so I have no reservations today. 

I'd agree with this sentiment. Curious why you still unvoted here.

RBM is on my radar.

1 hour ago, Aeoryi said:

hi hello all

The Unknown Ajah

~activates poke vote strats~

Rude.

Here let's try again. You repeat after me:

"The Unknown Ajah"

Edit: I'd also like to bring up the topic of making @Kasimirthe Returned this turn.

If you don't want to be alive forever, feel free to say "no, TUA, you're stupid and mean, and I just want the sweet abyss," but this feels like the best play here.

Edited May 5, 2024 by The Unknown Ajah

[Cash67]

7 minutes ago, The Unknown Ajah said:

I'm filing for improper use of trademark. Poke votes are a work of art (which you yourself mention) and therefore are under the domain of copyright. They were also in use long before you got your hands on it. Some would even say it's in the public domain at this point  

You see, I do not own the trademark, I just need to acknowledge it exists so that I can avoid some lawsuits (and an early exec)

And yeah @Kasimir and @The Unknown Ajah made a good point. Our choice of returned will influence the rest of the game. I’d rather have general consensus on who we choose. 

[Aeoryi she/her]

31 minutes ago, The Unknown Ajah said:

Rude.

Here let's try again. You repeat after me:

"The Unknown Ajah"

Edit: I'd also like to bring up the topic of making @Kasimirthe Returned this turn.

If you don't want to be alive forever, feel free to say "no, TUA, you're stupid and mean, and I just want the sweet abyss," but this feels like the best play here.

"The Unknown Ajah"

As for who to make returned, I nominate Archer.

18 minutes ago, Cash67 said:

You see, I do not own the trademark, I just need to acknowledge it exists so that I can avoid some lawsuits (and an early exec)

And yeah @Kasimir and @The Unknown Ajah made a good point. Our choice of returned will influence the rest of the game. I’d rather have general consensus on who we choose. 

That's why there's a vote, silly!

[Kidpen he/him]

2 hours ago, Archer said:

And an SE welcome to you, Kidpen! The D1 exe makes 'killing' folks more palpable, so I have no reservations today. 

NOOOOOOO
Oh, I'm a bit late to the party. I should be around until the cycle end though. Although actually-do we want a Heretic or a Priest to die today? I'm thinking a Heretic would be ideal, but there is some benefit to a Priest dying as well. So if I were to die it would be an okay situation for me, other than the whole win condition situation.

@Weaver of Lies Weaver of Lies seems to be a sensible next target.

[Cash67]

2 minutes ago, Aeoryi said:

"The Unknown Ajah"

As for who to make returned, I nominate Archer.

That's why there's a vote, silly!

Well yeah but I don’t want the split to be like 2-2-2-3 and then the three gets the returned. 

Just now, Kidpen said:

NOOOOOOO
Oh, I'm a bit late to the party. I should be around until the cycle end though. Although actually-do we want a Heretic or a Priest to die today? I'm thinking a Heretic would be ideal, but there is some benefit to a Priest dying as well. So if I were to die it would be an okay situation for me, other than the whole win condition situation.

@Weaver of Lies Weaver of Lies seems to be a sensible next target.

Heretic is always ideal, but then Heretic is immortal for the rest of the round. We’d have to identify all three heretics instead of just two. 
 

Long story short it’s a free flip. It’s just a case of who we give the unkillable power to. 

[Kidpen he/him]

1 minute ago, Cash67 said:

Heretic is always ideal, but then Heretic is immortal for the rest of the round. We’d have to identify all three heretics instead of just two. 
 

Long story short it’s a free flip. It’s just a case of who we give the unkillable power to. 

Wdym? We have to identify all the heretics regardless, since our win condition is eliminating them.

[Kasimir he/him]

38 minutes ago, The Unknown Ajah said:

I'm filing for improper use of trademark. Poke votes are a work of art (which you yourself mention) and therefore are under the domain of copyright. They were also in use long before you got your hands on it. Some would even say it's in the public domain at this point.

I'm just curious why you'd poke rather than stab. Knowing it's a poke dilutes the vote's utility and creates expectations.

4 minutes ago, Kidpen said:

So if I were to die it would be an okay situation for me, other than the whole win condition situation.

Uhhhhhhh what?

Just now, Cash67 said:

Heretic is always ideal, but then Heretic is immortal for the rest of the round. We’d have to identify all three heretics instead of just two. 

Why do we need to identify all three Heretics? @DrakeMarshall Doesn't the flipped heretic no longer count to wincon, therefore the last two are still Lovers?

40 minutes ago, The Unknown Ajah said:

Edit: I'd also like to bring up the topic of making @Kasimirthe Returned this turn.

If you don't want to be alive forever, feel free to say "no, TUA, you're stupid and mean, and I just want the sweet abyss," but this feels like the best play here.

I was considering giving some Village points for the suggestion, but I actually think it might be just slightly in your Elim range, so I'm conflicted. I have further thoughts on the issue but am considering keeping them to myself for the moment. This is weighted by the fact I have an appointment in the morning so might not be available as readily as I'd like to drop them.

9 minutes ago, Aeoryi said:

As for who to make returned, I nominate Archer.

But you don't vote Archer. Interesting. Considering an Elim lean here.

29 minutes ago, Cash67 said:

And yeah @Kasimir and @The Unknown Ajah made a good point. Our choice of returned will influence the rest of the game. I’d rather have general consensus on who we choose. 

I like contested votes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ They usually are more indicative than if we just kinda agree. Sure we can say get a good pivot-free margin, but I'm usually a fan of contestation and having to persuade others because it shows where your priorities are.

Edited to add:

@Cash67 Is there any reason you assume we have three Heretics?

[Aeoryi she/her]

4 minutes ago, Kasimir said:

But you don't vote Archer. Interesting. Considering an Elim lean here.

Because I think he is a villager, and I'm not voting out a villager.

Quote

• If there is a Day 1 execution, the victim is flipped normally but becomes Returned. They can no longer vote or take actions and don’t count towards win conditions, but they are unkillable and untargetable, and they can still speak.

Essentially, the d1 execution treestumps the person, so in other words, they're effectively dead but without the dead doc. 

[Kasimir he/him]

Just now, Aeoryi said:

Because I think he is a villager, and I'm not voting out a villager.

So if you are not voting out a Villager, then why are you suggesting making Archer a Returned?

[Kidpen he/him]

Oh, I completely missed the Lover rule. It depends on this rule clarification then, but I'd imagine they still become lovers if one is Returned

2 minutes ago, Kasimir said:

Uhhhhhhh what?

If I Return everyone knows I'm a Priest. If one were to assume I am not a High Priest, the only affect to me is that I can't vote, and I'd say sharing my reads without suspicion allows me a degree of influence that somewhat outweighs that.

[Kasimir he/him]

Just now, Kidpen said:

Oh, I completely missed the Lover rule. It depends on this rule clarification then, but I'd imagine they still become lovers if one is Returned

If I Return everyone knows I'm a Priest. If one were to assume I am not a High Priest, the only affect to me is that I can't vote, and I'd say sharing my reads without suspicion allows me a degree of influence that somewhat outweighs that.

So how does this detrimentally interact with your wincon?