Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have a couple ideas that I haven't actually written rules for; a Tyrian adjacent game with modified Soothers and Rioters (so there is no vote manip), and a conversion game where villagers can choose to die rather than get converted. If nobody before me can run a game, I could try and pin down the details on either.

Posted (edited)

Here’s the QF list:

  1. @Illwei
  2. @Fifth Scholar
  3. @Szeth_Pancakes
  4. @Araris Valerian
  5. Me

I’m assuming Araris doesn’t want to run two games at once, and I haven’t seen Szeth in a while (looks like their last log-on was in March) but idk on Illwei/Fifth. Happy to do it if no one above me wants to.

Edited by Matrim's Dice
Posted

Considering it’s been a week, I’ll send rules to the committee unless something else is already happening.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'm willing to run the LG but I need my rules approved. Don't think I can run the BT immediately after/during that though.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Shining Silhouette said:

What's the easiest kind of game to GM? Anyone interested in co-GMing?

I’d say doing either a LG or MR would be easiest, since QF games move really fast. In regards to rules, I would say doing a rerun of a past game, or doing a simple twist on standard mafia rules would be ideal for your first game.

As a bit of a warning, the list for LGs is quite long, so you probably want to sign up sooner rather than later.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Araris Valerian said:

As a bit of a warning, the list for LGs is quite long, so you probably want to sign up sooner rather than later.

To be honest, if you take out the repeats, and the inactive/busy people, it's quite a bit shorter than I expected and the problem carries through the MR and QF lists as well. A lot of the volume comes from repeat sign-ups, e.g. I have four entries, TUN has two, you have two, Ash has two, Steel has two, but functionally these GMs are often not going to be running back to back games. Then there's one-offs from people who haven't shown up in a long time but haven't been formally marked inactive, e.g. Randby, Karn, Tani.

7 minutes ago, Shining Silhouette said:

Ok, I'll put myself on the MR and LG lists!

Added.

17 hours ago, The Unknown Novel said:

I would like to sign up for a Break Tank, and the rules will just be ToS rules to see how SEers react to such a claim and clear heavy ruleset  

Am leaving this one to someone who knows BT rules :P 

Posted
On 11/8/2022 at 7:13 AM, The Unknown Novel said:

I would like to sign up for a Break Tank, and the rules will just be ToS rules to see how SEers react to such a claim and clear heavy ruleset  

Alright, checked and getting back:

Basically, the idea of testing a ruleset focused around claims/clears could be BT material, but your ruleset would have to be specifically tailored to that idea, not just using ToS rules. ToS isn't itself the issue, it's that BTs tend to be focused on one specific mechanic or set of mechanics you are testing. This sounds potentially a bit too big to be BT appropriate.

Posted
1 hour ago, Illwei said:

Can all my slots be marked as busy for the next two months

I'll do it but can you ping me when you want it unmarked? Unlikely to remember to unbusy it, sorry!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...