Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What are people's thoughts on who should make the first move? (Hypothetically speaking for those with a little or a lot of social awkwardness)

Edited by AnanasSpren
Posted
19 minutes ago, AnanasSpren said:

What are people's thoughts on who should make the first move? (Hypothetically speaking for those with a little or a lot of social awkwardness)

in relation to what. It's late and I'm gonna go eat supper, so I can't be bothered re-reading

Posted
2 hours ago, AnanasSpren said:

What are people's thoughts on who should make the first move? (Hypothetically speaking for those with a little or a lot of social awkwardness)

The answer: an unhelpful "you should."

Posted

In general; whether it be showing interest in taking it further, asking someone out etc. Do/would females prefer males/other females to make the move and vice versa, what classes as making the first move or showing somone you're interested versus just being friendly (hard question to answer but I'm in a situation on an escalating schedule so I was just curious

Posted
49 minutes ago, AnanasSpren said:

In general; whether it be showing interest in taking it further, asking someone out etc. Do/would females prefer males/other females to make the move and vice versa, what classes as making the first move or showing somone you're interested versus just being friendly (hard question to answer but I'm in a situation on an escalating schedule so I was just curious

I'll still say "You should". Gender does not factor into it, it's just whoever is able to overcome the social awkwardness long enough to make the first move. Since you won't know that, it's better to take fate into your own hands.

A simple "out to dinner/coffee" should be sufficient to show heightened interest. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Orlion Determined said:

I'll still say "You should". Gender does not factor into it, it's just whoever is able to overcome the social awkwardness long enough to make the first move. Since you won't know that, it's better to take fate into your own hands.

A simple "out to dinner/coffee" should be sufficient to show heightened interest. 

Spoiler

 

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Orlion Determined said:

I'll still say "You should". Gender does not factor into it, it's just whoever is able to overcome the social awkwardness long enough to make the first move. Since you won't know that, it's better to take fate into your own hands.

A simple "out to dinner/coffee" should be sufficient to show heightened interest. 

Aye, I ask purely because of reading an article about the gender question

Posted
2 hours ago, AnanasSpren said:

Aye, I ask purely because of reading an article about the gender question

There is, of course, a school of thought that thinks women should let the menfolk do the asking.

I rather think that's a load of sexist hooey.  If you're interested in a person, express that interest!  Guys can be shy, too!

Posted
22 minutes ago, Kaymyth said:

There is, of course, a school of thought that thinks women should let the menfolk do the asking.

I rather think that's a load of sexist hooey.  If you're interested in a person, express that interest!  Guys can be shy, too!

It's true, we can.

Posted
4 hours ago, AnanasSpren said:

In general; whether it be showing interest in taking it further, asking someone out etc. Do/would females prefer males/other females to make the move and vice versa, what classes as making the first move or showing somone you're interested versus just being friendly (hard question to answer but I'm in a situation on an escalating schedule so I was just curious

 

23 minutes ago, Kaymyth said:

There is, of course, a school of thought that thinks women should let the menfolk do the asking.

I rather think that's a load of sexist hooey.  If you're interested in a person, express that interest!  Guys can be shy, too!

I don't think expressing interest should be gendered. Maybe once upon a time it was romantic but......just who could be bothered? If you like someone let them know. Maybe they're too awkward to tell you they like you too. And if they're not other interested at least you know rather than waiting forever for them to speak up when they're not going to.  

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Kaymyth said:

There is, of course, a school of thought that thinks women should let the menfolk do the asking.

I rather think that's a load of sexist hooey.  If you're interested in a person, express that interest!  Guys can be shy, too!

Thank you

I remember one time in Government class, the teacher had everyone vote on whether or not it should be mandatory for the guys to pay for a date, and every single girl in the class raised their hand for yes. And I just sat there like, What? Why?? What if, for whatever reason, I'm unable to pay? I shouldn't be prohibited from spending time with someone because I don't have a lot of (or any) disposable income. And who says you need to cough up a wad of cash to have a good time in the first place?! Go to the park! Go on a hike! Heck, just sitting around talking is a perfectly fine date idea! 

[/rant]

Edited by Slowswift
Posted

The person who asks should be the one paying, unless going dutch has been agreed upon. The asker is usually the one who plans the date, so they're able to plan something that matches their budget. And if that's just a hike or a picnic in a park, that's perfectly fine. The cliche dinner and a movie is both (usually) expensive and a really lame first date idea.

Posted
1 minute ago, little wilson said:

The person who asks should be the one paying, unless going dutch has been agreed upon. The asker is usually the one who plans the date, so they're able to plan something that matches their budget. And if that's just a hike or a picnic in a park, that's perfectly fine. The cliche dinner and a movie is both (usually) expensive and a really lame first date idea.

I guess that works. But now we're back at who gets to do the asking. :P

Posted
39 minutes ago, little wilson said:

The person who asks should be the one paying, unless going dutch has been agreed upon. The asker is usually the one who plans the date, so they're able to plan something that matches their budget. And if that's just a hike or a picnic in a park, that's perfectly fine. The cliche dinner and a movie is both (usually) expensive and a really lame first date idea.

Going Dutch?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Delightful said:

Going Dutch?

 

2 minutes ago, PantsForSquares said:

Splitting costs 50/50, I believe. Or by item, I'm not sure. It's some sort of cost-splitting lingo.

As I've always heard it used, it means each perso pays for what they order. So if one person wants to order prime rib with lobster tail, the other person isn't required to chip in when they only ordered a small chicken dish. 

Posted

Going Dutch sounds fair. Everybody pays for what they order, you don't have to worry about the other person ordering more than you can comfortably pay for, or feeling obligated to return the favor of having your entire meal paid for you.

Posted

I'm gonna put this here very simply: everyone wants the other person to make the first move, because making the first move is terrifying.  

There is literally no reason for this to be gendered. 

In the past, societies 'ideal woman' of dating age was a quiet, pretty, unassuming ornament. A woman who made the first move would have been seen as an overbold 'hussy', or merely as an unattractive and undesirable mate.

That was stupid, and I'm so glad that feminism has killed/is killing those stereotypes.

 

As far as paying goes: my ex and I would always try to pay for each other. We'd almost make a game of it; often one of us would intentionally sneak over and pay while the other was in the bathroom/etc. 

If we were doing a date (movie, skating/etc) and a dinner, the one who planned it would pay for the date, the other for the dinner. 

That's a healthy way to do it. There are other ways - if one of you has a healthy full time job and the other is a starving student? Maybe a different balance. 

But yeah, there's absolutely no good reason that paying for a date should be gendered. Why would it be? 

In the past, it was gendered because men were expected to work, while women weren't. As women entered the workforce, they'd often just work to provide for themselves until the got married, whereas women would go for higher paying careers. The concept of the man being the financial provider was deeply engrained in society. Thus, in the past, it made sense for men to pay for dates. 

 

Now? There's no reason for it to be gendered. 

Posted
19 hours ago, Dankness Ascendant said:

Hewo, I'm a shy dandewion dat happen to bwe on fier.

Did you also know this is the Official Thread of Relationships thread?

Mc'scuse me?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...