-
Posts
21457 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
95
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Channelknight Fadran
-
The Goku vs Saitama debate in a nutshell:
- "NoOooOoooo but Super Saiyan Blue Goku has g o d k i and Ultra Instinct! Even if Saitama was stronger - whICh hE iSn't - he wouldn't be able to keep up with the superpowered kaioken. All it would take is one well-timed kamehameha, or after awhile Goku's efficiency would..."
- "But he's One Punch Man."
There are actually two ways of looking at this that aren't just "I like this character better," which I have discovered because turns out both characters are pretty great.
Functionally: Simply look at the numbers. Who's exploded the biggest things? Who's killed the toughest guy? And in this scenario we have no clue who would win, because the two universe define Power in completely different ways. What consitutes a god in Dragonball might be completely different than whatever it was that gave Garou his super-mcduper cosmic powers. You could easily say "but Goku's killed gods before, and Saitama hasn't," but the types of gods Goku fight are just... different.
Narratively: The people who want to avoid the debate in question will simply say "well Saitama's a joke character, so it doesn't really matter" and hope that defuses the situation. And, indeed, this is the case; but there are additional steps you can take to assure this outcome remains true.
First of all, it isn't hard to create a character that can defeat Goku. Here, I'll demonstrate:
Quote"Fadran proceeded to beat the ever-loving crap out of Goku, barely even turning an eye. Pathetic, he thought."
But nobody's going to take that seriously because it is dumb. I'm sure there are plenty of characters even in published works that could take Goku and Saitama without breaking a sweat, but what's really important is that said characters have a basic philosophy or ideal to back them up.
For Saitama, it's pretty simple. He trained really damn hard for three years, and then his hair fell out and he became invincible. Now we feels nothing, because there is nothing left to feel - his life is just mishap after mishap, very few of which require him to put his all into fighting. In most cases he does, indeed, defeat a foe with One Punch; there are exceptions, but even they have never even come close to damaging him. Saitama wants to fight a worthy opponent, but none exist.
Goku, meanwhile, was developed as a paragon of hard work and perseverance. All the way up through the end, his whole gig was "The guy is stronger than me; I need to train hard so I can beat him." In fact, pretty much of all of DBZ consisted of haughty aliens born with extremely high power levels - who were then given their commupance by Goku simply working harder.
If Saitama had been born as One Punch Man, I can see a reasonable story giving Goku the win; but Saitama wasn't born with his powers, and even literally trained his hair out to get it (albeit accidentally). And in another vein, it would seem like Saitama would want Goku to be a real fight, but one of the two following situations would prevent this from happening:
- Turns out Saitama just has Infinity Power, and beats Goku without breaking a sweat. In this case he's just left brooding over tea again.
- No matter how hard these two warriors try to set aside the time for a friendly bout, something always gets in the way. Goku needs to go to Goten's piano recital; Saitama completely forgot about the Labor Day sale at the supermarket; Krillin invited them both over for barbecue and a movie night. Time and time again, something would get in the way. Ultimately, the only battle they ever have is in Super Smash Bros, during which they are both absolutely destroyed by Yamacha.
-
You know what? I like Peter Jackson’s Hobbit trilogy
-
It's nowhere near the level of Incredible that are the Lord of the Rings films, but I still think their existence is a worth one.
There are, of course, a few main issues with them. I'll put them here in a spoiler box 'cause.... well, spoilers.
Spoiler-
The Love Triangle: This one is definitely the most glaring, to the point that the movies could probably kick themselves up a star or two if they'd just done away with it. What's weird is that it's a dumb addition both conceptually and in execution; but honestly, that just means you can kind of deal with it either way. If you're a fan of Kili x Tauriel (which I'm not actually against, btw; the chemistry was a tad weak, but I thought it was okay), then you're likely bothered by the lack of screentime that the two had. If you think the addition was stupid in general, then you can take solace in knowing that there honestly wasn't very much of it.
- Also it wasn't really a love "triangle" in anything but name. There was, like... maybe a scene and a half where Legolas seems less of a protective older brother and more of a jealous boyfriend... but maybe that's just because Legolas just doesn't give off straight vibes? Hell, he barely gives off romance vibes in the first place. Sorry, Legolas x Gimli shippers - he's just too ace for this.
-
The... "Creative Liberties": Yeah... Sauron and the Nazgul were a little weird, even if pretty much all the additions fit into the canon anyway. It makes sense that Saruman would've seen the strength of Sauron firsthand, that they were aware of the Nazguls' return (which wasn't even that much of a surprise, because they'd never really been defeated in the first place), and Gondor had been fighting off Mordor for several decades as of FotR. The only way in which is was a poor addition was in terms of pacing, because there're practically 45 minutes of Gandalf just taking Ls at Dol Guldur.
- Basically: as a nerd I appreciated it, and as a writer I didn't.
- Dragon Sickness: This is actually the same as the love triangle, if you think about it. If you hate its addition, then great - it doesn't stick around for long. But if you do like the idea, then it'll seem underutilized. There probably could've been a better way to utilize the "Thorin corrupted" arc, but otherwise I honestly don't think it sucked all that much.
- Beta Wormtongue: Alfred was a little weird.
But there are also LOTS OF COOL THINGS
Spoiler- Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins: Need I say more? He did wonderfully. Martin Freeman is as much Bilbo Baggins as Ian Holm, and I will stand by that 'til the day I die.
- Ian McKellen, sticking to it: An argument could be made that the Christopher Lee and Cate Blanchett weren't quite as "into it" with these films (not to say they gave a bad performance - it was still S-tier at the very least); but Ian McKellen went all the HFIL out with his Gandalf again, and I salute him for it.
-
The CGI...?: I know it's noticeable, and I know that nothing will ever compare to the CG x Miniature x Matte Painting x Cinematography SFX from LotR; but I still really like it. Middle-Earth just has a completely different vibe to it; and considering how fundamentally different Bilbo's journey from Frodo's is, I think that's a good thing.
- Would've been nice if Azog was live-action, tho
-
Speaking of... Azog!: Giving Thorin a nemesis was an excellent decision, even if his tenuous connection to Sauron was a little contrived. The whole thing about the Pale Orc killing Thror and driving Thrain mad was completely canon; and all things I considered, I can totally see Tolkien adding a Thorin vs Azog plotline if he'd developed that pre-Hobbit.
- btw, Bolg was in the book. Just in case you weren't aware.
- Actually including the Battle of the Five Armies: If you didn't know already, then it might (not) surprise you to learn that The Hobbit is a children's story. The only on-"screen" deaths were the trolls (who were turned to stone instead of bled out), Smaug (who was a dragon), and Thorin (who deserved that farewell). Basically, Tolkien was actively avoiding direct bloodshed, which is why he knocked Bilbo unconscious right as the whole thing began - that said, for an action/adventure movie, including the whole battle was the right decision.
- Radagast: Excellent. We love our skrunkly little hermit man.
-
The Music...?: It wasn't standout, but there were a few pieces that really worked. They included Concerning Hobbits sparingly, which meant it just really hit whenever it actually played. In LotR it was a theme for hope and light, while in these films it was more of a wistful and nostalgic tune.
- Also the end credits theme for the last movie was sung by Billy Boyd, AKA Peregrin Took. I recognized his voice immediately.
The rest of it was on the Aight to Solid spectrum.
-
The Love Triangle: This one is definitely the most glaring, to the point that the movies could probably kick themselves up a star or two if they'd just done away with it. What's weird is that it's a dumb addition both conceptually and in execution; but honestly, that just means you can kind of deal with it either way. If you're a fan of Kili x Tauriel (which I'm not actually against, btw; the chemistry was a tad weak, but I thought it was okay), then you're likely bothered by the lack of screentime that the two had. If you think the addition was stupid in general, then you can take solace in knowing that there honestly wasn't very much of it.
-
-
-
If you're into anime, then chances are you've heard of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure.
...actually, scratch that. You've probably heard of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure.
It's in the name that this isn't any ordinary show, and you would be completely right in assuming that it's absolutely nothing like other animes. It's something of a monolith in the anime community: there are the regular Weebs, and then there are the JoJo's fans who must never be disturbed. Those who love this show are of a different breed of nerd.
The problem is that curiosity will get the better of you, sooner or later. You'll say to yourself, "I'll watch a few episodes and see if it's any good," and chances are that'll be the end of it. If the style and storytelling doesn't catch your eye, you'll give up - but give it a few episodes, and you'll be doomed to return.
All JoJo's fans begin by loving the show ironically. Its battle scenes are simultaneously incredibly realistic and fantastical; each episode's plotline is both extremely predictable and arbitrary. It's a character-driven show, and yet the characters are incredibly one-dimensional.
But the show knows this.
Which means that if you love JoJo's Bizarre Adventure ironically,
then you begin to love it unironically
and once that happens, there is no going back
