TheMightyLopen

That's not how it works though. The role of the Snapped is likely the same as the previous role of the converted. So, say a Rioter got converted into the Smoker, that means if someone Snapped, they'd Snap into a Rioter. So we have no idea what the role of the Snapped is. The List is based off of my gut. At the moment, I'm just trying to get the voting started, because the earlier it starts, the more likely we'll get useful information. So I'd like Bugsy to vote before I remove my vote from him. Or at least give opinions on some players. Similarly, where are you going to place your vote Drake? Edit: Praise the Ja!

Y'know, if you respond so fast, I can't just leave my vote on you. Aonar, sounds good. Bugsy is next on the list(a very real list that exists). Any suspicions? Just putting this out there, but the fact that someone Snapped means it's fairly likely the converted player was a Misting, correct? I mean, it's possible that it was just a random Snapping, but it's a higher chance that it was caused by the conversion, I think. Does this mean the player who Snapped should tell someone what role they got so we can try and figure out who lost their role? I'm not sure how many players have roleclaimed yet, but we might have gotten lucky and can figure it out by simply asking those with that specific role to prove they still have it, if that's possible. Edit: Praise the Ja!

He probably saw that I posted online times last cycle, then decided to stay offline this Night Turn and put an order in in advance like you said so players wouldn't trust using online times in future games to determine innocence/guilt. Sounds like a Meta thing to do after all. (I'm mostly kidding, though I don't think I'd clear him on the off chance he did send in an advance order for whatever reason) Agreed. It helps when you vote though Aonar. Why leave it up to the rest of us? Edit: Praise the Ja!

Aonar did tell me my own role in a game where I was a villager and he was an elim once. He claimed to have figured it out by some kind of algorithm or something, when in actuality he only knew it because I'd claimed to one of his elim teammates. So there is some precedent of him being a risk taker. That, and he's been a converter elim before are the reasons I'm paranoid of him. He's one of a few players I could see saying suspicious/unusual things just so we'd write him off for being so bold in the thread. That's not to say I really believe he's the Inquisitor, just that I'm wary of him and want others to be as well. This post by Jondesu is actually one of the main reasons I listed him. It honestly looks like a post I might make if I was an eliminator. Helpful advice, to some extent, but will likely be forgotten for the most part, because any number of people probably would have given the advice, or something like it, so it's not like he's doing any damage to himself if he's an eliminator. But he could gain some trust by giving the advice, because an eliminator would never give good advice, right? Stating that we need to "determine who got each power that was stolen and used to convert someone" is rather pointless to mention, since it's the whole point of the game really. He also assumes the Inquisitor will make a Smoker, even though the lynch hasn't happened yet. Maybe he's already made plans for a new Smoker? Assumptions like this are made by villagers from time to time, so it's not like I'd call for his death because of it, but combined with my overall feel of his posts, it makes me wonder. I don't know, once I start pulling posts apart like that, I get very tunnel-y, which is why I left it at "not much reasoning behind these suspicions" or whatever I said. I once put together a very convincing argument(it almost convinced me at least >>) for why Meta was evil instead of the real elim when he'd helped lynch multiple other elims and the real elim had done nothing but suspicious things. I can't recall if that's true or not. I know it is true in some cases though, so you could be right. I usually notice when I do that after a while, but I'm not perfect. >> Drought did indeed mention being sick, so I'll switch my vote to Iamspartacus, since they haven't been online for quite a while. I don't really think it's possible they're the Inquisitor, since the site said they weren't even online during the Night, but I'd rather a true inactive die right now while it won't really hurt us than an active villager be killed just for the very slight chance of us taking out one of the Inquisitors lives(since it's likely they've got multiple). Rand, I'm still looking forward to reading the elim doc for LG30... When it's finally posted. It's pretty rare that I trust an eliminator like that(mostly because it's rare for me to trust anyone ), so I think you can understand me putting you on that list. You seem to be acting fairly similar to that game, but it's really the only game I've played with you as a villager, so it's not much of a sample. Edit: Praise the Ja.

> Claims to be the Inquisitor > Dares attacker to lynch him Definitely the Inquisitor. Lynch him now. Nope. But like Arraenae said, it was a pain for the GM of LG2, so it's possible it's not in this one. There's still a chance though, so it's up to you what you want to reveal in PM's. I wouldn't be against lynching Drought, since he's pretty inactive. I'll send him a PM though, just to see what's up with him. If I'm gonna vote someone for being inactive, I might as well do as much as I can to get them back. My top suspects for the Inquisitor are Meta, Jondesu, Randuir, and Aonar(I'm biased against him, he's almost always been evil when I've played with him). I've got no reasoning to back up those suspicions though. I just went through todays thread and marked off who I thought wasn't the Inquisitor as well. But I was being pretty generous with some players I marked off, so I don't think it'd do much good to post that list.

I don't believe there's any way to block the conversions, no. Rand seemed helpful in LG30 as well. Just saying. I've attacked Aman on Night 1 a lot of times(not this time though I swear ). And I'm not a lurker. So I'm not sure that conclusion is too solid. If you were correct though, who do you think that points to? Edit: Praise the Ja.

Well, if anyone has the time, maybe check everyone's online times to see who's been online after Aman posted his plan? It's possible the kill was sent in before he even put his challenge forward, but it might be worth it to check that. I'm going to try and do so myself, but I'm a little busy at the moment and might not get all of the times before I'll be offline for a couple hours. Edit: Good news! Pretty much everyone is active! Which means I didn't really learn anything. Iamspartacus wasn't online during the Night at all, but other than them, only me, Drought, and Bugsy weren't online during the time after Aman challenged the Inquisitor and then the Night ended. Praise the Ja.

May the Ja send righteous judgement upon the poor fool who committed this transgression. Praise the Ja.

Oh. Dang it. I should have thought of that too. >.< Sorry Sart! Not like my vote would have changed things, since it was rioted, but if I'd paid better attention, I could have asked for votes to be moved/removed. :/ Edit: Praise the Ja. >>

So Sart is getting lynched I think. He's got 3 votes and Mark and Drought both have 2. I was going to remove my vote from Drake, but seeing as there's only 5 or 6 minutes left, there's not much point. But eh, guess I will anyways. Drake. Glad to see you posting today.

Huh. Okay. Do we know what each of the Uber powers do though? Praise the Ja.

You're right. I just can't stand it when players survive the lynch. See below. An accurate representation of my feelings. >> I can understand not having a lynch this Cycle. I prefer it when games start fast though, since I think it's best to get everyone involved as early as possible. So it's not just about information, but about setting a good tempo for the game. Meta said something like this on page one: "we can't just sit back and bide our time." And he ran LG2, so I think he should have a pretty good feel for what we need to do. That doesn't mean a lynch on Day 1 is absolutely necessary(I don't think it is just to make myself clear), I'm just trying to warn against a passive attitude. Could someone explain what "Uber" powers are? I was already planning on doing a much more thorough read through of the rules and asking the GM's questions, but I'm not familiar with that term, so others might not be either(I'm totally not asking because I'm lazy or anything ). @Drake Marshall, just in case you didn't see, I put my vote on you in my previous post and asked you some generic questions. I noticed you were online a little while ago, but you didn't respond. Praise the Ja.

I was kind of making a post when you mentioned me Aman. But then I got distracted, so I just started over. Anyways, I don't really have much to say. I imagine the Inquisitor won't say anything too controversial so they don't draw too much attention to themselves, but I think their thread activity depends on the specific player. On whether or not we should have a lynch, I'm currently undecided. I do feel like games just move a lot slower without a D1 lynch, but we do have a lot of players and it is extremely likely we'll hit a villager if we do have a lynch. If we don't have one though, it kind of feels like we're just prolonging the inevitable. The Inquisitor will probably just kill someone during the Night, and then we'll be at Day 2 and still just the Inquisitor. If we lynch now, it's possible the Inquisitor will convert Night 1, which would at least give us a slightly better chance of getting a Spiked Day 2. I'm not sure that's a totally accurate presentation of our situation, but it's late and I wanted to try and post something. So that's what I'm thinking right now. So far the only person I've really considered as a possibility for being the Inquisitor is Drake, for his post that basically said "nothing to say, sorry for not saying much, I'll say more tomorrow." Which I read as him posting so as not to be called out for lurking, but not having any idea what to post, and then realizing he could get called out for not saying anything worthwhile, so he added that part about saying more tomorrow to kind of protect himself from those accusations. I guess I should put my vote there then, since I feel like this post makes me look like I'm in favor of a Day 1 lynch. >.> Drake, could you say what you think the Inquisitor might do or whether or not you think a Day 1 lynch is a good idea? And also if you have any suspicions for the Inquisitor. Praise the Ja.

I've got the time for this. I'll join as Sidon, a devout Jaist. Praise the Ja. Now to read through LG2!

Yeah, I kept feeling like someone was gonna call me out for something... I believe this was the 4th game I've been evil with Orlok(not sure if LG24 counts, but that would make it 5). But yeah, since most of the village seemed to accept the idea of 2 elim pairs, I was more than happy to enforce that idea and keep the village from feeling a sense of urgency. Great game everyone! I thought that the Day Turns had pretty good activity throughout, which always makes the games funner no matter what side you're on. I was surprised at not getting very much attention even though I was posting quite a bit, but I'll take it. Part of the reason I didn't want to have everyone partner claim was because it would have made me and Orlok's survival that much harder to explain. >> Wyrm, I enjoyed the game immensely, and the write-ups were great as per usual. I also thought the pairings were a really interesting mechanic, and if I'd been a villager, I definitely would have liked having a confirmed partner to bombard with my crazy theories.

Well, I thought it was more substantial than his previous posts, which is why I liked it. Only major thing I didn't like about it was that he didn't vote on anyone. Just asked a few players some questions. And here's his vote. But I see it as mostly a retaliation vote, and the reasoning seems kind of thrown together to make it seem like it's not just a retaliation vote. Could you go into more detail about what your partner expressed, HH? Fair enough. I've always viewed kills as an unreliable source for suspicion anyways, since it's possible the elims killed someone specifically to mess with suspicions. Okay. So this is a lot later than I'd planned. I took a "nap" and ended up sleeping a lot longer than I thought I would. >.> I've looked over all of Len's and HH's posts, and I do think the evidence weighs heavier against HH. Len did warn about bandwagoning on Bart/Aman on D1, which might have helped save a villager from being lynched. I don't like the way he kept after Bart for his vote on him, but I guess it's understandable given Bart really didn't give much reasoning, and then he kind of seemed to hide behind Aman. I could also see him proposing his role claiming plan as a villager. I already mentioned he's bold enough to have proposed it as an eliminator, but I probably was looking at all of his posts with some bias, since I've had some suspicion of him for a while. And as I mentioned earlier, him and his partners idea about clearing Bart/Aman through lynching Sart sounds like a villagers thought process. HH, as has already been mentioned, stated that Bart and Len were highly unlikely to be elims back on D1. He said he meant it from a purely statistical viewpoint, but he still seemed like he was saying he thought they were both villagers(because why else mention statistics?). He didn't vote on D1, but I don't really see that as alignment indicative. D2, he votes on Sart, because he could be lying about his partnership with El(not sure what would be the point of that though, so don't see how it's suspicious) and also because Sart might have been trying to figure out village pairs like he says the elims would try to do. But he does say he was voting blindly on Sart because he didn't want another no lynch. At the time, I was a little nervous that he was voting with me, since I thought he could be trying to buddy up with a little, since I'd accused him earlier. Then at the very end of the Cycle, he says he thinks Sart is village with no explanation. Which brings us to this Cycle, and I've already commented on his posts this Cycle. Anyways, in conclusion, his post about Bart and Len being probably villagers, plus pretty much all of his posts about Sart seems suspicious. His vote on Len this Cycle also seems like an easy way to vote, since he's just countering Len's vote on him. I'm not certain he's an elim, but I do think there's better evidence against him than there is for Len, and I'm pretty certain that they're not both elims from the way this Cycle has played out. If HH is an elim, I think I'd consider Len and Jon fairly clear. If he's village, well, I'd have to reevaluate things. Vote tally: HH(4): Len, Jon, Stick, Lopen Len(1): HH Drought(1): Arinian @Magestar, @DroughtBringer, are you going to place your votes anywhere? I'm not 100% sold on this lynch, so if you have a better candidate in mind, I'd like to hear your reasoning.

I had a really busy day, but I am planning on making a more in depth post later tonight, once I've reviewed things. For now though, I am considering moving my vote, but I'd prefer to go back and look at all of yours and HH's posts before I make a decision. I did think your point about HH's post about you and Bart was a good point, but only because I thought it was more likely you'd make that connection(that he defended 2 villagers) if you were village. However, I did consider that if you were an elim, you may have killed Bart/Aman so you could make that argument. Because your accusation of HH is only grounds for suspicion to us if we assume you're village. But, I'm not sure. That logic might be kind of tunnel-y. Which is why I'd like to read back through the game. Thank you for the explanation though. It was a sound idea, and I'm not sure if you'd think of that as an eliminator, so I suppose it makes me lean a little more towards village for you.

Okay, so, I was wrong about Sart/El. I feel largely to blame for that one. Sorry. :/ I still have a nagging feeling about HH, but I do like how he started this Cycle off. I'm still leaning village for Jondesu. That leaves Magestar, Elenion, Drought, Stick, and Arinian. I don't have much of a read on Mage, since none of his posts have really stood out to me either way. He did say he couldn't say more today, but I'm also curious to hear more from him. Len, I'm increasingly suspicious of, because if we did put scans and vig kills to a vote, depending on the eliminators role distribution, that plan could be more beneficial for the elims than the village. If they have a Shadow or Surgeon, they could block the scan or the kill if we have a public vote. Seems almost too obvious for an elim to propose, but Len is one of the bolder players I've played with, so it wouldn't surprise me. I'd also like to hear from him about his partner's "plan" mentioned last Cycle as the reason why he switched his vote to Sart. Drought has not said much at all. I'm hoping he'll be around a lot more this Cycle, since he said he was busy last Cycle, and the Cycle before that he didn't really say much that was alignment indicative. Stick is another who hasn't done a lot. She did vote last Cycle finally, even if it was pretty late. I'm not sure if I've ever played a game with her where she was an elim, so I'm not really sure what to look for. Her nonchalant attitude kind of makes me lean village I suppose. I don't have much of an opinion on Arinian either. He's been fairly active, which is good, but I don't have any strong feelings about his posts. So, neutral I guess. I really need to go back through the whole game with the new information in mind(Sart/El's innocence as well as Bart/Aman's). I'll put my vote on Len for now. Seems like multiple people have expressed suspicion of him, but he hasn't really got any votes. Only 2 kills and 1 lynch so far, but I do think we should stay aware of numbers. We've got 8 pairs of players left, meaning we're at 6-2 or 5-3. I'm hopeful there's only 2, and the lack of village roles so far makes me lean that way, but it's always best to assume the worst, so again, everyone needs to vote. Aaand ninja'd by Len. Hm. I do think you make a fair point, but you kind of skipped over your role claiming plan, and though you did mention your partners idea, you didn't tell us what it is. Could you please explain?

Is there a reason to reveal partners right now though? I can understand your points for revealing them I guess, but it seems to me that we could wait until it's more convenient. If a scanner scans someone as an elim, we could ask that everyone claims, since it would definitely be worth it at that point. It is possible that the elim connected with the scanned elim would lie about their Night partner, but that would be a risk, since they'd be claiming a villagers partner, so once we figured out who was lying(either by deduction during the Day or by waiting until Night), that village pair would be cleared. I was actually considering that players reveal their partners in the later Cycles(though if there are 3 pairs of elims, or another kill ability, this game could be over faster than I'm thinking), so we could have a boost in discussion because of the extra stuff to analyze, so I get your point. I'm just of the opinion that the negative of giving the elims the ability to choose their targets outweighs the positive of the info we'd gain at the moment. Your reasons for voting Jondesu aren't what made me vote on you. I've got a village read on Jon, so the fact that you're voting on him at all is what I mentioned as suspicious. Also you're claiming El is your partner, and I'm suspicious of her. What is the point of everyone claiming their roles? It could give some accountability, but I'm not sure I quite get what you're trying to accomplish here. To respond to Arinian, my village read on Manukos is small, but I still thought I'd mention it. My village read on Bart/Aman wasn't about anything Aman did. RP is really hard to analyze... I just lumped them together since I had a small gut read of village on Bart, and I also mentioned that the read was probably influenced by Len voting on him twice, because I'm mildly suspicious of him(Len). Vote tally: Bart/Aman(2): Len, Arinian Jondesu/???(1): Sart Sart/El(2): Lopen, HH No-vote(5): Mage, Drought, Stick, Bart, Jondesu Bart, eh. I don't have a strong enough read that I'd be against his lynch. I'd like to see him vote, since right now it kind of looks like he's laying low. I'm keeping my vote where it is for now though, since I'm still suspicious of Sart/El(even with HH voting alongside me >.>). Mage, Drought, Stick, and Jondesu, please add your vote somewhere as well. We need everyone to be voting. LG30, it seemed like only the same 7 or 8 players were voting every Cycle, which made analyzing things really difficult. This game, we've only got 10 players left who can vote. So please, vote somewhere.

I think it could become helpful to know everyone's partners, since we could get a better view of each pair, which means we could look at 2 players posts for an alignment instead of just one. I don't know how much good it would do now though, since there hasn't been a lot of time for both sides to post. My reasoning for voting on HH was that he said it was highly unlikely Len or Bart were elims then went on to cast suspicion on Bart. His explanation actually did lessen my suspicion of him a little, I just wasn't around to respond to it. I went to sleep really soon after posting my last post, and while I did see his defense before I went to bed, I was too tired to respond and then I slept until rollover, so I haven't had a chance to respond until now. Anyways, what I found suspicious was that he(in my interpretation) said he thought both Len and Bart were villagers, but went back on that by saying something Bart did was suspicious. His explanation does make some sense though, in that he was saying Len and Bart were unlikely to be eliminators strictly from a percentage viewpoint. I tend to just treat everyone as if they're a possible elim rather than saying "this person is more likely village because there's more villagers than eliminators" because that mindset doesn't really get you anywhere. And to respond to El about how HH not being logical doesn't necessarily make him evil, I understand that, because villagers are illogical all the time, but there's still the fact that his argument(logical or not) was defending both Len and Bart. I've seen eliminators defend both players in an argument like that before, so it was more about suspecting his intent behind his argument than his logic. Also, what makes you say he's more likely village(and please don't say "because statistics" :P)? I don't think Bart would have said what he did because Aman said you were a hindrance to their evil plans. That...would be a really strange thing to do. Eliminators don't usually voice their true intent in the thread. >.> Also, Sart voted on Jondesu. Just saying. To respond to Drake's vote on me last Cycle(RIP), I hadn't realized HH had a vote on him initially(until I did my vote tally), because I didn't know "Harvey" was him, but it did give me more reason to vote on him, because once 2 votes are on a player, it's easier to get opinions on them from others. If my vote was going to be the killing vote, I probably would have removed it though, since I had already stated that a no lynch might be best. And this is a side note, and I know you can't respond since you're dead, but if you've got a question for me, please don't vote on me when you ask it(for future reference, I just really dislike D1 votes on me since I've been accidentally/unluckily lynched because of poke votes like that >.<). The only things I remember being about Drake/Rae were that Rand and Manukos were suspicious of Drake(Manukos by agreement with Rand's analysis), and that Manukos said "Rae is a Ghostblood" but he only said that because of her member title. Manukos' post was only a few hours before rollover, so I feel like he wouldn't have said that if he was an eliminator and knew they were killing her. Maybe they hadn't decided yet or something, but I'm leaning village on him for now. Not sure about Rand. His reasons for suspecting Drake were pretty good I think, so even though he was wrong, I'm not sure it means all that much. But you probably shouldn't listen to me when it comes to him. He fooled me pretty good last game... And to respond to Orlok's question of "was your question about the elims having a kill or not you feigning ignorance?" Obviously it wasn't worded quite that way, but it was implied. Anyways, I felt the question was relevant to the discussion and I had yet to ask it in my PM. A lot of times I'll ask rules questions in my PM rather than the thread, because I don't want to give the elims any idea's for strategy or it's specifically for my role, but since this question didn't have any sort of implication like that, I thought it would be best to ask it in the thread, so everyone would know straight from the GM. Next order of business, my vote. My suspects as of right now are: HH(reasons stated), El(by association with HH and I get nervous when someone says they have a village read on me without giving any explanation), Len(just a small amount, I can't really decide about him, a couple things he's said have made me a little suspicious, but I've had troubles reading him in the past), Drought(mostly would like to see more from him, and since he'll be gone for the most part this Turn, I'm content to give him more time). I'm voting on Sart. I'll admit it's mostly because I'm suspicious of El, but I will say that I disagree with him about revealing partners. It is possible to be careful about wording if you do post some stuff for your partner, and it does offer protection from the elim kill. He's also voting on Jon, who I'm leaning village on. I considered voting for HH again, but I know I'm prone to tunneling(Arinian as my latest victim, sorry about that btw) so I'd like to hear more from him and try to keep more of an open mind. My village reads right now are: Manukos(thing about Rae), Jondesu(him saying he hadn't realized elims could only target Night players seems like a genuine thing - it seems too obvious a thing to miss to think up to gain trust, if you get what I mean. I know he voted on Bart after he claimed Aman was his partner, but if Bart/Aman...are villagers(is a villager? ), that seems like a really gutsy thing to do for an elim), kind of Bart/Aman, just based on gut(Aman's post didn't really make me lean either way, but it was good RP!) and because Len is going after Bart like he is. Everyone else is kind of "meh." Either not enough content, or I just can't tell. >.>

Well. It's not like I've ever had any trouble getting on that list. Which part of the writeup says there are more elims than normal? I didn't see any kind of indication like that, so I'm curious how you got that idea. That's good advice, but it's also pretty obvious, and you don't comment on anything besides that. Any other thoughts or opinions about different aspects of the game? Normally, I'm a big supporter of a D1 lynch, but in this case, I do think there's an argument to be made for no lynch. However, as has been said many times before, we should continue as if we are going to have a lynch so discussion isn't halted, and if we don't like how it's turning out at the end of the Turn, just tie it up. I think I agree with Arin on this one. Len asking about elim numbers doesn't seem very alignment indiciative to me. Sure, it's pretty pointless(no offense ), but in my experience, villagers will post pointless posts just as often, or even more often than eliminators. I agree with Drake that it'd be nice if you could just paraphrase whatever it is that Aman wants to explain. Vote tally: Bart(2): Sart, Len, Drake Len(1): Bart HH(2): Jondesu, Lopen HH, I forgot to quote your other post about Bart, but in response to that, first, you say that Len and Bart are highly unlikely to be elims. What makes you say that? I'm not terribly suspicious of either of them, but saying that it's "highly unlikely" either of them are elims is odd, to say the least. But moving past that, you then go on to cast suspicion on Bart in the same post(but don't vote on him). So which is it? Do you suspect Bart or not? Besides the fact that Bart is a new player and I don't think lynching a newbie on D1 is something anyone wants to do, I'd also like to hear the reasoning behind the vote on Len, which I'm guessing was prompted by Aman. So I'm against lynching Bart for now. I'd like to hear more from Stick and Drought, since neither of their posts really have much content. Any opinions on Bart/Len or HH? Or anyone else for that matter. I'd also like to hear from Magestar, as he has yet to post, but according to his online times, he was around like, 12 hours ago.

I'm not sure how many pairs of elims I think there are. 2 sounds right at first, based on normal balancing percentages, but looking over the rules, both players in a pair die simultaneously(they are the same person after all ) and I'm not sure if the elims have a kill unless they have an Assassin, because the rules don't mention a Night elim kill. So, I think 3 pairs is possible, if they don't have a kill. Otherwise, I imagine it is 2 pairs. Wyrm, do the elims have a group kill each Night? I think that refers to the fact that there's actually only 11 "players" because each pair of players are the same person, just with different identities based on Day/Night. Doing the contribution crusade on D1 doesn't make a whole lot of sense. And especially not this game. It's for weeding out inactives. Can you really call someone "inactive" if they haven't posted at the very beginning of the game? I think it's best to either wait until C2 to lynch an inactive, or at the very end of C1 if we don't have a good lynch target. But in this game, I think it's possible we won't ever have to lynch an inactive, because the pairing system allows another player to take over for their inactive teammate. Also, if we lynched an inactive, we'd be killing 2 players. 1 player who wasn't active D1 and their Night half who didn't even get a chance to play(well, if we have a lynch, that'll happen regardless, but it still doesn't seem right to me). Anyways, I'm hoping we never have to lynch an inactive, since that would mean both players in a pair went inactive, and it really does waste a valuable Turn to lynch inactives. So I advise that if someone does go inactive, we wait for a bit to see if their other half gets control, so we're not killing a potential active villager while at the same time wasting a Cycle by not discussing active players. On that note, the only 2 players who have said anything discussion wise are Len and Drake. I don't really have any strong feelings about the posts. They seem like pretty typical D1 posts to me - not very informative. While I always enjoy trying to guess elim numbers/roles, there's not much point to it when we know so little, so I'd prefer focusing on different things. Like calling out any lurkers(not inactives), proposing plans, and going over the active players posts(hard to do until we've got some actual content I know). I was planning on going over the rules and giving my thoughts on them, but instead I defeated the final boss of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. Which is amazing, btw. Another thing I was thinking about is revealing your Night half. My opinion right now is wait and think things through completely, and also that keeping your Night half a secret should give you protection from the elims if they do have a Night kill. Anyways, that's it from me for tonight.

I'll sign up as Revali.

Suspicion of me? But yes, I'm an Elantrian. A Hidden Elantrian to be exact. More than half of the remaining players have held that item at one point or another I think. But still, contests are fun. I'll guess...Coinshot.

So. 7 players left. 7 players lynched, all Citizens. 7 other players killed whose alignments are unknown. All of this in 7 Cycles... That's weird. XD Anyways, where do we go from here? I don't think Assassin has been online for a while. So he's not making any kills or Rioting votes. I guess I'll vote on Bart for no reason.