Autism/neurodivergence club

[Usseewa ✾ She♡Her ✾]

2 minutes ago, Deception said:

Autism Diagnosis be like:

Doctor: "the sky is green"

Child: "no, it's blue"

Doctor: "You don't have autism. Bye!"

Child: "...why?"

Doctor: "You understood my sarcasm about the sky being green. Autistic people cannot understand complex social cues like sarcasm"

Child: "Or maybe I have looked at the sky before, and I remember the color"

Doctor: "Impossible! Autistically disabled people have sensory issues that prevent them from looking at bright lights, like the sky"

Child: "...no. Not for me. Autism is a spectrum. Also, autism is a difference, not a disability"

Doctor: "I've heard people say that about cancer, schizophrenia, and broken arms. It's 2026."

Child: "But with autism it's true"

Doctor: "And also cancer, I assume?"

Child <stops talking>

Doctor: "I won the argument! Ha!"

Child's mom: "He is having a reaction to this situation. He's extra sensitive to this sort of stuff"

Doctor: "Which proves my point! He is sensitive, so he can't look at the sky, so he must have understood my sarcasm!"

Child: <punches the doctor in the face>

*laughs irl*

i cant even follow either's "logic"...

also the whole "autistic people don't understand sarcasm" and "robots don't understand sarcasm" sounds eerily similar.

hmmm...

[Deception He/Him]

1 minute ago, Usseewa said:

also the whole "autistic people don't understand sarcasm" and "robots don't understand sarcasm" sounds eerily similar

Beep boop I am an AI robot I will take over the world.

[Usseewa ✾ She♡Her ✾]

Just now, Deception said:

Beep boop I am an AI robot I will take over the world.

so am i

but i wont

[Factor She/Her]

4 minutes ago, Usseewa said:

*laughs irl*

i cant even follow either's "logic"...

also the whole "autistic people don't understand sarcasm" and "robots don't understand sarcasm" sounds eerily similar.

hmmm...

 

1 minute ago, Deception said:

Beep boop I am an AI robot I will take over the world.

...

I have been accused of my work being AI 14 times, none of which were AI

I do fanonically have ADHD but idk about autism

[Deception He/Him]

1 minute ago, Factor said:

I have been accused of my work being AI 14 times, none of which were AI

Wait when? Tell me more!!!!!!!

I write exactly like ChatGPT sometimes but I haven't been accused of using it yet lol.

[Keteᛕ He/Him/His]

1 hour ago, Deception said:

Autism Diagnosis be like:

Doctor: "the sky is green"

Child: "no, it's blue"

Doctor: "You don't have autism. Bye!"

Child: "...why?"

Doctor: "You understood my sarcasm about the sky being green. Autistic people cannot understand complex social cues like sarcasm"

Child: "Or maybe I have looked at the sky before, and I remember the color"

Doctor: "Impossible! Autistically disabled people have sensory issues that prevent them from looking at bright lights, like the sky"

Child: "...no. Not for me. Autism is a spectrum. Also, autism is a difference, not a disability"

Doctor: "I've heard people say that about cancer, schizophrenia, and broken arms. It's 2026."

Child: "But with autism it's true"

Doctor: "And also cancer, I assume?"

Child <stops talking>

Doctor: "I won the argument! Ha!"

Child's mom: "He is having a reaction to this situation. He's extra sensitive to this sort of stuff"

Doctor: "Which proves my point! He is sensitive, so he can't look at the sky, so he must have understood my sarcasm!"

Child: <punches the doctor in the face>

oh God all the stereotypes about

sensitivity,

lack of empathy,

lack of feelings,

sensory issues,

overreactions,

underreactions,

memory,

knowledge capacity,

and social capability.

I hate it.

WE'RE NOT FREAKING ROBOTS! WE'RE HUMAN BEINGS!

Edited June 3 by Through The Living Ketek

[Aeoryi she/her]

This is the kind of stuff I can do when I lock in. ADHD or something 

Spoiler

this is theory regarding dimensionality and direction

 

[Factor She/Her]

4 minutes ago, Deception said:

Wait when? Tell me more!!!!!!!

I write exactly like ChatGPT sometimes but I haven't been accused of using it yet lol.

yahhh

I watched a bunch of videos about writing, was like "ok so this is how to write essays" and sometimes I feel... seriously like AI. Like I just take in content from books and spit out a response with the same feel.

...which is genuinely my process.

so yah... it comes out rather AI. plus I have had several of teachers who are clueless about it and slap "this is AI" on half the class

[Deception He/Him]

29 minutes ago, Aeoryi said:

This is the kind of stuff I can do when I lock in. ADHD or something 

  Hide contents

this is theory regarding dimensionality and direction

 

Uhhhh... Whaaat?

Somebody was very locked in.

 

[Aeoryi she/her]

5 minutes ago, Deception said:

Uhhhh... Whaaat?

Somebody was very locked in.

 

at a cost. I can't choose when I want to do things

[Deception He/Him]

11 minutes ago, Aeoryi said:

at a cost. I can't choose when I want to do things

Yea thats the tradeoff. Mine is that I suck at task switching, so it is really hard for me to get started doing something and once I lock in I REALLY don't want to stop, and I suck at some social things.

[Verdance he/him]

2 hours ago, Aeoryi said:

This is the kind of stuff I can do when I lock in. ADHD or something 

  Hide contents

this is theory regarding dimensionality and direction

 

Explain!!! 
i want to know things!

[Deception He/Him]

Same! Explain! NOW!

also join the cult of the brick.

[Aeoryi she/her]

so basically the question was simple: What is direction?

Angles relate two different axes within an n-dimensional space where n is an integer greater than one. You can split up angles into planar components (x,y/y,z/x,z) and use that to find solid angles, which exist in 3d space. In addition, by extrapolating upon this axiom, we can theorize that a "hypersolid angle" within the fourth dimension would not only have a right hyper corner equal to 1/16th of the unit hypersphere, but it would also exist in 6 different planes. 

Speaking of planes, you can examine how different bodies interact with a dimensional space above them- for example, the unit line exists within the 1d space, but two distinct axes exist within 2d space, and 3 in 3d space, so on. But there's also planar representation, which isolates for two specific axes respectively. for example, the two dimensional space only has one plane (x,y), but the three dimensional space has three different planes (x,y/x,z/y,z). The fourth dimensional space with axis a has seven different planar components (x,y/x,z/y,z/x,a/y,a/z,a) and the dimensional space above it would contain an additional five new configurations to two-dimensional planar components. Now where this gets weird is when you start to use a solid 3d component- three-dimensional space only has one solid component, that being (x,y,z), but four-dimensional space has three additional components. Five-dimensional space has 

Vectors can be added if the properties of all elements but one are alike, or if they're in the same direction. This is by changing the frame of reference, but there exists new axes perpendicular to the axis a where a is in line with a vector and vector components are thus defined within terms of parallel to these axes.

[Verdance he/him]

7 minutes ago, Aeoryi said:

so basically the question was simple: What is direction?

Angles relate two different axes within an n-dimensional space where n is an integer greater than one. You can split up angles into planar components (x,y/y,z/x,z) and use that to find solid angles, which exist in 3d space. In addition, by extrapolating upon this axiom, we can theorize that a "hypersolid angle" within the fourth dimension would not only have a right hyper corner equal to 1/16th of the unit hypersphere, but it would also exist in 6 different planes. 

Speaking of planes, you can examine how different bodies interact with a dimensional space above them- for example, the unit line exists within the 1d space, but two distinct axes exist within 2d space, and 3 in 3d space, so on. But there's also planar representation, which isolates for two specific axes respectively. for example, the two dimensional space only has one plane (x,y), but the three dimensional space has three different planes (x,y/x,z/y,z). The fourth dimensional space with axis a has seven different planar components (x,y/x,z/y,z/x,a/y,a/z,a) and the dimensional space above it would contain an additional five new configurations to two-dimensional planar components. Now where this gets weird is when you start to use a solid 3d component- three-dimensional space only has one solid component, that being (x,y,z), but four-dimensional space has three additional components. Five-dimensional space has 

Vectors can be added if the properties of all elements but one are alike, or if they're in the same direction. This is by changing the frame of reference, but there exists new axes perpendicular to the axis a where a is in line with a vector and vector components are thus defined within terms of parallel to these axes.

Thats really cool

i hate vectors and prefer standard form but still cool

[Deception He/Him]

13 minutes ago, Aeoryi said:

so basically the question was simple: What is direction?

Angles relate two different axes within an n-dimensional space where n is an integer greater than one. You can split up angles into planar components (x,y/y,z/x,z) and use that to find solid angles, which exist in 3d space. In addition, by extrapolating upon this axiom, we can theorize that a "hypersolid angle" within the fourth dimension would not only have a right hyper corner equal to 1/16th of the unit hypersphere, but it would also exist in 6 different planes. 

Speaking of planes, you can examine how different bodies interact with a dimensional space above them- for example, the unit line exists within the 1d space, but two distinct axes exist within 2d space, and 3 in 3d space, so on. But there's also planar representation, which isolates for two specific axes respectively. for example, the two dimensional space only has one plane (x,y), but the three dimensional space has three different planes (x,y/x,z/y,z). The fourth dimensional space with axis a has seven different planar components (x,y/x,z/y,z/x,a/y,a/z,a) and the dimensional space above it would contain an additional five new configurations to two-dimensional planar components. Now where this gets weird is when you start to use a solid 3d component- three-dimensional space only has one solid component, that being (x,y,z), but four-dimensional space has three additional components. Five-dimensional space has 

Vectors can be added if the properties of all elements but one are alike, or if they're in the same direction. This is by changing the frame of reference, but there exists new axes perpendicular to the axis a where a is in line with a vector and vector components are thus defined within terms of parallel to these axes.

Well, I almost lost the plot multiple times but I think I somehow managed to mostly understand that. Wow.

[Aeoryi she/her]

41 minutes ago, Verdance said:

Thats really cool

i hate vectors and prefer standard form but still cool

34 minutes ago, Deception said:

Well, I almost lost the plot multiple times but I think I somehow managed to mostly understand that. Wow.

I gotta figure out how to make it useful though

[Verdance he/him]

Just now, Aeoryi said:

I gotta figure out how to make it useful though

Find a way to unlock the 4th dimension for better microchips or smt

[Aeoryi she/her]

Just now, Verdance said:

Find a way to unlock the 4th dimension for better microchips or smt

we don't have hyperspace in the real world or anything that needs to use hyperspace to be relevant to a lower plane of existence

While yes you can do things involving different faucets of vectors (for example time/pos x/pos y/pos z) that's lame and doesn't count

 

[Deception He/Him]

2 minutes ago, Aeoryi said:

I gotta figure out how to make it useful though

Uhh... Probably something you could do computer related in like a simulation or animation that would be really cool. Maybe. If I understood that any better I could probably use it but I'm too tired right now to try to comprehend.

[Usseewa ✾ She♡Her ✾]

guys i think im impulisve

maybe

 

like ive been having days where i just suddenly come to a decision or desire. sometimes for something ive been delaying or thinking about for a long time (like scheudling my hrt appointment. i had it like a week or two ago, but before thet i waited a while)

or suddenly wanting to get a piercing or dye hair or paint my nails something or buy something or yeah

[Aeoryi she/her]

Just now, Usseewa said:

guys i think im impulisve

maybe

 

like ive been having days where i just suddenly come to a decision or desire. sometimes for something ive been delaying or thinking about for a long time (like scheudling my hrt appointment. i had it like a week or two ago, but before thet i waited a while)

or suddenly wanting to get a piercing or dye hair or paint my nails something or buy something or yeah

oh yeah happens all the time. Used to use it to justify stealing.

[Usseewa ✾ She♡Her ✾]

1 minute ago, Aeoryi said:

oh yeah happens all the time. Used to use it to justify stealing.

caaught in 4k

 

but i want to know if the decisions are any less valid if they're impulsive 

[Aeoryi she/her]

3 minutes ago, Usseewa said:

caaught in 4k

 

but i want to know if the decisions are any less valid if they're impulsive 

they're probably not always going to be great decisions imo but they can help if you're indecisive sometimes

 

[Deception He/Him]

4 minutes ago, Usseewa said:

but i want to know if the decisions are any less valid if they're impulsive 

Philosophy yap for no reason (completely unhelpful but read it if u want whatever):

Spoiler

If all of your decisions were impulsive, they would all be valid - but if only some were impulsive, things get complicated.

First of all: If all of your decisions are impulsive:

All humans take a certain amount of time, and all humans have valid decisions. All mice take a shorter amount of time, and a mouse decision is still valid to a mouse. Therefore, there is no universal amount of decision time for all decision makers.

In addition, a higher IQ person may come to decisions faster. This makes their decisions more valid, not less, so this invalidation doesn't make sense.

 

Now for the rabbit hole of only some decisions being impulsive:

You could say that the impulsive ones are invalid because they are less educated than non-impulsive ones

You could also say that they are all equally valid because using the same logic to separate the human race's decision time, you can separate an individual's decision time.

YAP YAP Yap Yap yap yap yap yap yap...

Ok now that I have said nothing in a whole lot of words, here is my real answer:

IDK