I disagree. This method of grouping would produce opposites, and by WoB, some shards have opposites, some don't.
https://wob.coppermind.net/events/247-ancient-17s-qa/#e5518
I can't agree with fortune as a shard. It makes too much sense as a phenomenon like connection and identity. Do you really think feruchemists tap into a third, completely separate shard?
To continue our conversation,
https://wob.coppermind.net/events/256-oathbringer-london-signing/#e8702
Talks about how Adonalsium's infinite power is 16 times greater than a shard's infinite power, where I got the idea of "more omnipotent" from.
Yes.
https://wob.coppermind.net/events/181-stormlight-three-update-4/#e3768
Adonalsium is a supremely powerful being (so are the shards), whether God is the label you use is up to you, but Brandon Sanderson will not provide a definitive answer about whether a more omnipotent omniscient "God" exists (called the god beyond by its adherents).
https://wob.coppermind.net/events/100-rbooks-ama-2015/#e3436
https://wob.coppermind.net/events/202-barnes-and-noble-book-club-qa/#e4444
I am unsure about your use of "investits." I prefer investon for the fundamental particle (A la graviton, electron, etc.) and Khriss for the future unit of measurement (one milikhriss, 2.4 Gigakhriss)