Young Bard
-
Posts
2205 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Young Bard
-
EDIT: It's rollover time. I'll repost what I said immediately after rollover. Sorry.
-
He's gone after the Ghostbloods when voting in thread, which is the same faction Joe was trying to kill off with his attacks.
-
Uhhh... Catch up with the thread. Sheep's off the hook now he's revealed, in favour of Dowanx. While I'm not particularly suspicious of him, I think we need to vote for our next best guess at an Eliminator to prove Bugsy's claim wrong, and the lynch seems to have decided you're that candidate. I'll do an analysis of every player left this night turn. Dowanx - I'm sorry the lynch has formed on you while you're offline - I got really annoyed when that happened to me in QF18, but it can't be helped. New Vote Tally (because I screwed up Nyali's about half a second after she made it ): Dowanx (5): Darkness Ascendant, Lopen, Sart, LivingLegend, Young Bard Alias Sheep (3): Araris, Frozen Mint, Ecthelion Bugsy (2): Paranoid King, Bridge Boy Lopen (1): Amanuensis Amanuensis (1): Sart Conquestor (1): Bugsy *sigh*... I still don't get my third win con... Oh well...
-
A tied lynch helps protect the Roleblocker in the game... You're right Mage. Conq, Darkness. Care to help?
-
How about Conquestor, Mage? With your vote and mine, that's 2, so it will tie the lynch for now, and we can see what the scan results say in the morning. If someone else comes on as well, then we can lynch Conq, which is no great loss, because if he's a villager his vote/actions have counted for nothing so far and if he's an Eliminator that's one less we have to deal with.
-
Alright, I don't have much time to respond to all of this (seriously, everyone, I just got up, and I see this.) I'll say I'm a Green Drafter - I have the ability to roleblock someone every night. I can verify this claim if you like by roleblocking someone of your choice, and have a blue drafter scan me. I'll respond to each individual statement in a moment, but I need to get this out there to hopefully stop the lynch on me, because we can't afford to lose a green drafter so early.
-
Oh yeah. I think the rule is that the last vote counts anyway, but I'll just be doubly sure. Bugsy
-
Yep. I thought an Independent would have died by now, to be honest... Apparently not. I'm actually kind of annoyed - I need to scan one of them for my second win con. Roll over and die already
-
Sheep raises a good point - bandwagonning like that is kind of suspicious, IMO - it allows you to appear active without actually attracting too much attention. So I'm going to vote for Daniyah. At the same time, Sheep, if you're suspicious of a player, I advise you vote on them, because Eliminators have attempted to turn the villagers against each other and keep their own hands clean before as well. By voting on a player, you both encourage a more thorough response and show players that you're not saying one thing and doing another.
-
Thanks, Aman. Sheep.
-
That would be great, thanks. EDIT: The other good news is that Sheep is on Roshar with me today - so you'll discover the results tonight, although that means I won't be able to worldhop tonight, unless I skip voting on Joe...
-
Aman, you haven't voted on Bugsy either. Just saying. Maybe you forgot or something...
-
Bugsy's own vote kind of sealed that fate for me. In order for Bugsy not to get lynched, there would have to be a counter-vote on someone else, and Bugsy could easily pull a vote switch at the last second and get someone lynched. And, as a revealed Eliminator who everyone's decided not to kill, he'd get away with it. Now, I know the name of one other non-GoH Evil, and a vote swap to them would be advantageous to me, as I'd achieve one of my win cons, but... Bugsy knows that his trick won't last indefinitely, so he must be planning something that will put him back in the game later. So yes, I'm calling his bluff. But I'll tell you what - I'll be online at rollover on Thursday, so I'll be able to see if Bugsy tries to pull any tricks. If he doesn't, then I'll tie the vote at the last second. If he retracts his vote, I'll retract mine, and if he changes his, I'll keep mine exactly where it is. That way, we'll have a guaranteed no-lynch. EDIT: Stink was Lightsong, by the way. I'm pretty sure everyone knew that, though. Stink was a Child.
-
It would also suck if we let the eliminator go free for a few cycles thinking he's on his lonesome while we go for our individual win cons, and then he pulls a hammer with his 3/4 mates that he forgot to mention to us.
-
Who is your brother, out of interest? (If you don't want to say, you don't have to.) *sigh* I had a PM set up with Meta. Did you have to go and get yourself killed 3 times over in Cycle 1, Meta?
-
You're missing something - the fact that this is coming from the word of a revealed eliminator and is almost certainly not to be trusted.
-
Actually, Bugsy. If someone has a roleblock out there, I recommend blocking out Bugsy's vote on himself. Not only will it make me achieve my win con (hopefully), but that way, we can avoid any last minute lynch surprises.
-
Uhh... You do realize I'll vote on you anyway, right? This way, you help a poor, young bard achieve his dream of savagely murdering wrongdoers - a dream I'm sure a tender heart like yourself would support.
-
Thanks, Bugsy. You've just spoiled my win con now . Oh well. You wouldn't mind greening it out for me, do you? If I ask really nicely?
-
Congratulations, Darkness. You just made yourself a target for the Eliminators. Great. Yellow Drafter, wherever you are, target Darkness. We can't afford to lost a bichrome this early on. And I was talking more to the sub-reds rather than the reds or the oranges, but anyway... *sigh* I need to look at this again when I've had enough sleep (so sometime next year, then), but why on earth would you claim that? Are you trying to get yourself killed?
-
OK. Clearly an Elim, guys. Let's lynch him. (That's OK. I understand, but I need people to start talking so people can comment on other people, so we can get a discussion going.) Stick. Seriously though, being quiet in SE Games is probably the easiest way to avoid suspicion if you're an Eliminator - it worked brilliantly in LG25 (for that reason, I suggest the sub-red drafters target inactives if they haven't got any other suspicions, because that will encourage players to post more.) So, if you're naturally quiet, I'll do what I can to prod you out of your shell. It is possible, with the Servant role, but that means Ecth should have started with the role and alignment of a player. Ecth, I wouldn't recommend revealing your player's role, but it would help it would really help to have a cleared villager to work with, so do you mind telling us who they are? (Unless I misunderstood the Servant role... GM Clarification: When you talk about the Servant role, Servants begin with the role and alignment of a player, right? Or are they allowed to choose one over the course of the game?) Hello, Conq. Have a poke-vote. Have you got anything else to add before rollover? @Conquestor
-
Hmmm... OK, Assassin in Burgundy. What about you, Stick? You're online right now, so I'd be interested to hear you say something before I go to bed. @I_am_a_Stick
-
Alright, I'm still bitter that Assassin in Burgundy won LG25 by playing inactive the whole game, so I'm going to place a vote to encourage him to speak up. He's been online since the game started, but hasn't posted, which is a red flag for me when he's pulled that trick once before. @Assassin in Burgundy EDIT: I focused on Assassin, but the same is true for everyone who hasn't posted - I'd like to hear from you! @Conquestor, @Darkness Ascendant, @The_Lady_of_Chaos, @Metacognition, @I_am_a_Stick, @Mark IV, @Daniyah, @Magestar
-
There's already a whole subforum here dedicated to it, unfortunately. Check it out here, if you like.
-
I didn't lead the lynch on Joe, though, just took part in it. I think they mean I have to be the first to vote on them.
