Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What type of information do you want Creccio? Just peoples roles and what if anything they have learned? There isn't really any vital information that people can really get from their role that should alter how we go about this this turn.

 

Also when you say "i would refrain from killing him yet" do you mean don't vote for anyone yet or that we should keep Zeph alive? I disagree with both of those statements either way. 

 

We need to start voting asap since we get more info the more people vote and defend themselves. Ripple, a rioter is a very interesting role and quite useful especially for the Skaa. I see that the coinshot decided not to take another shot which still leaves me with my suspicions mainly focused on Zephrer and Winter. 

 

I don't really have anything new to add to my suspicions about them but I would appreciate the opinions of other people since most voting has been done based of off others reasoning. Everyone must have something to say at this point, even if it is something small or seemingly insignificant that you have noticed or that seems to be wrong. 

Posted

What type of information do you want Creccio? Just peoples roles and what if anything they have learned? There isn't really any vital information that people can really get from their role that should alter how we go about this this turn.

 

Also when you say "i would refrain from killing him yet" do you mean don't vote for anyone yet or that we should keep Zeph alive? I disagree with both of those statements either way. 

 

We need to start voting asap since we get more info the more people vote and defend themselves. Ripple, a rioter is a very interesting role and quite useful especially for the Skaa. I see that the coinshot decided not to take another shot which still leaves me with my suspicions mainly focused on Zephrer and Winter. 

 

I don't really have anything new to add to my suspicions about them but I would appreciate the opinions of other people since most voting has been done based of off others reasoning. Everyone must have something to say at this point, even if it is something small or seemingly insignificant that you have noticed or that seems to be wrong. 

 

 

By refrain from killing him i mean not to vote him off and let the day die., by all means vote for him if you want.

 

If we know what everyone did, its easier to put things together, find flaws; its easier, i swear.

 

I have 1 charge left.

 

If you believe this is good, please let us know what have you done with your metals, it can only help at this point...

Posted (edited)

Okay, what do you want now? I've already defended the points that've been said. 

 

I didn't ask for you to defend yourself, I was just asking everyone left to say their suspicions or whatever they think no matter how small it may be. We can't have everyone following one player, especially a dead one. but that seems to be what is happening:

 

Alright, so who else did Clutch say should die? At this point it would be worth doing it, as aside from Kipper (much sarcasm from him) I think Clutch got most of it right on who is evil, so who is next to die?

 

 

@Creccio: We still do have a coinshot out there. If they are good we don't want to narrow down who it is so that the Skaa can kill them especially now that we don't have any more lurchers.

Edited by Clanky
Posted

At this point what do you prefer, to make the coinshot more narrow or to have all the information out? As long as we dont kill the coinshot and he gets copperclouded his shot IS going through.

 

If we have a lynch on a skaa and the shot is good, thats 2 less skaa, if the game is not over by then it is only 1 skaa left. 1 Skaa vs 8 Inquisitors, I like my odds. 

 

Even if the shot is bad, we get 7 to 2, which is still good.

 

I mean, everyone use your discretion but i think this is the most viable way

 

I didn't ask for you to defend yourself, I was just asking everyone left to say their suspicions or whatever they think no matter how small it may be. We can't have everyone following one player, especially a dead one. but that seems to be what is happening:

 

 

 

@Creccio: We still do have a coinshot out there. If they are good we don't want to narrow down who it is so that the Skaa can kill them especially now that we don't have any more lurchers.

Posted

You said you were suspicious of me, so obviously I want to defend myself. You want me to just ignore that and let you lynch me after you lynch Zepher? 

Lots of my suspicion involves you not really saying your suspicions or actually taking a firm stance on anyone. If you spend more time trying to be helpful to the inquisitors rather than just saying "your suspicious of me anyways what can I do?" then I would be less suspicious. I don't like telling people what they should do to get me to remove my vote or be less suspicious. What is the point of that?

 

"Hey I am suspicious of you because of this, but if you do this I won't be"

 

Then people always just try and do stuff to check off the list so that they are no longer suspicious. What they do means nothing after that and doesn't help anyone! If someone is going to be less suspicious to me they should try and be helpful to the team and not just try and defend themselves. 

Posted

What points last cycle? The ones were you tried to defend yourself? This one, this onethis one  or this one? Or maybe you mean this one? What did you say that helped the inquisitors at any time? What did you say that wasn't "I always act this way" "what do I have to do to defend myself" "did you even read my posts" "I already defended myself. 

 

My point is that if all you do is try and defend yourself why would that make me less suspicious? All that means is that you are trying to survive. Surviving isn't the main goal of the game. The main goal is to help your team win.

Posted

Everybody please give a big round of applause for Haelbarde, who is stepping forward as the Takeover GM! I will start adding them to all the PMs with the players so they can start getting ready for when they take the reins!

Posted

Yay Haelbarde! 

 

Winter, I'm sorry if I seem to be being rude. All that I am trying to say is that playing to make me less suspicious won't be what makes me less suspicious of you. I just want you to give your thoughts on the game and play as if you don't care about my suspicions. 

 

Also where'd everyone else go? Even if you have decided that Deaths last list is the be all and end all of who is Skaa and who is not we still need people to vote. People aren't just going to start dying by themselves for having their name on the list, deathclucth didn't have a Deathnote.

Posted

Zepher

 

Tell me, who do you suspect, what do you know, charges, tell me everything you know so you are not suspicious in my eyes.

Posted

I feel like Zephrer's wriggled out of a lot of close lynches. At the moment, he's probably on the top of my suspicion list.

Posted (edited)

Crecio. Why would he have to do that? Because honestly, if he says he has a role which the eliminators 'might' have one of, that'll just increase your suspicion of him. I too suspect Zepher, but he's already got a bunch of votes on him, so I'll vote for you. 

 

 

... What?

 

Zinc is a role that the Skaa might have, any of the roles might be.

 

I have been claiming Zinc this entire time and have been doing all I can to discuss. Dont quote me on this, but Zeph has not done anything, much like yourself, to help the inquisition. Defending oneself is not the same thing as contributing and you are both terribly lacking in that department.

Edited by Creccio
Posted (edited)

Alright people, Takeover GM here.
 
Given that Gamma will be going dark at some point, and possibly within 5 hours, I'm going to be starting now, just in case he goes dark before cycle end. As such, the first thing I need to address is the cycle turnover. At the moment, this cycle ends at around 1:30 AM local time, which really is not workable for me. I just went looking for what the normal turnover was, but it seemed to vary a bit... So I'm just going to pick a new time. I'd ideally shift the cycle turnover 2 hours forward (edit: back), but to not disadvantage anyone by shifting the end of this cycle forward, I'm going to extend for a day, so that it should end at a more convenient time for me. This way, it also gives me more time to get ready, as I'm busyish today. So I've made use of Kipper's countdown clocks, and made one for when I'm currently intending the cycle to end.

 

tur_1446813000.png

Edited by Haelbarde
Posted

Alright people, Takeover GM here.

 

Given that Gamma will be going dark at some point, and possibly within 5 hours, I'm going to be starting now, just in case he goes dark before cycle end. As such, the first thing I need to address is the cycle turnover. At the moment, this cycle ends at around 1:30 AM local time, which really is not workable for me. I just went looking for what the normal turnover was, but it seemed to vary a bit... So I'm just going to pick a new time. I'd ideally shift the cycle turnover 2 hours forward, but to not disadvantage anyone by shifting the end of this cycle forward, I'm going to extend for a day, so that it should end at a more convenient time for me. This way, it also gives me more time to get ready, as I'm busyish today. So I've made use of Kipper's countdown clocks, and made one for when I'm currently intending the cycle to end.

 

 

 

Thank you so much for the help. Thanks for this, like really, super thanks

Posted

Alright people, Takeover GM here.

 

Given that Gamma will be going dark at some point, and possibly within 5 hours, I'm going to be starting now, just in case he goes dark before cycle end. As such, the first thing I need to address is the cycle turnover. At the moment, this cycle ends at around 1:30 AM local time, which really is not workable for me. I just went looking for what the normal turnover was, but it seemed to vary a bit... So I'm just going to pick a new time. I'd ideally shift the cycle turnover 2 hours forward (edit: back), but to not disadvantage anyone by shifting the end of this cycle forward, I'm going to extend for a day, so that it should end at a more convenient time for me. This way, it also gives me more time to get ready, as I'm busyish today. So I've made use of Kipper's countdown clocks, and made one for when I'm currently intending the cycle to end.

 

tur_1446813000.png

Did you pick that color of text specifically so it would match the countdown clock color?!? Looks really good. You rock, Haelbarde, and thank you for just appropriating my clocks that have gotten me so many upvotes srsly I will spike you being so selfless as to become the GM on the fly like this!
Posted (edited)

Did you pick that color of text specifically so it would match the countdown clock color?!? Looks really good. You rock, Haelbarde, and thank you for just appropriating my clocks that have gotten me so many upvotes srsly I will spike you being so selfless as to become the GM on the fly like this!

I picked the colour of the text because it's what I use in docs.

 

And hey, I gave you credit! 

Edited by Haelbarde
Posted

I picked the colour of the text because it's what I use in docs.

 

And hey, I gave you credit! 

Uh huh. I still think I detect the eye of an artist...

Huh? I didn't say anything about credit? Psst, you CANNOT read strikethrough text

Posted

Okay, first off...

@clanky and Phatt I'd like to apologize for getting upset at you. I was having a really bad day... Even so, that's no excuse for my actions. I'm sorry...

@Creccio. I have lots of suspicions, but I have not even the slightest amount of evidence to back it up. So it really wouldn't do much good to bring them up. (Besides, since the majority of the remaining players believe me to be an eliminator, my suspicions would be invalidated.)

@everyone else alive :)

I've offered all of my defenses and they've only served to make me more suspicious in your eyes. I'll not offer any more, because to do so would be counterproductive.

@deathclutch. Sorry I suspected you, I couldn't be sure. But in the end, I'm glad you and I were on the same side. Thanks for believing me :)

Well, This looks to be my final cycle. if this ends up being the case, thanks for letting me play with you guys. It's been fun :)

Posted

Okay, first off...

@clanky and Phatt I'd like to apologize for getting upset at you. I was having a really bad day... Even so, that's no excuse for my actions. I'm sorry...

@Creccio. I have lots of suspicions, but I have not even the slightest amount of evidence to back it up. So it really wouldn't do much good to bring them up. (Besides, since the majority of the remaining players believe me to be an eliminator, my suspicions would be invalidated.)

@everyone else alive :)

I've offered all of my defenses and they've only served to make me more suspicious in your eyes. I'll not offer any more, because to do so would be counterproductive.

@deathclutch. Sorry I suspected you, I couldn't be sure. But in the end, I'm glad you and I were on the same side. Thanks for believing me :)

Well, This looks to be my final cycle. if this ends up being the case, thanks for letting me play with you guys. It's been fun :)

 

 

Would you mind saying them? If you are resigning to life might as well help the inquisition as much as you can... right?

Posted

Very well, my suspicions are:

Creccio - I have no idea why, something just seems off about you.

Ripple - for same reasons as before, I suspected Kas, and since you acquired his role I don't suspect you.

And Stink - Mostly because I didn't trust you before, and I'm still suspicious.

As I said before, I don't really have any proof. But you wanted my suspicions, so here they are.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...