Jump to content

Zephrer

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Zephrer

  1. Zephrer
    Sorry all ya'll life's been hectic and i haven't had much time to get on. For the GM's benefit, I'll be roleplaying as Tardeick a shardbearer from Roshar who accidentally worldhopped and is looking for a way home. and for everyone else's benefit, I'm on Taldain, I see no harm in saying that. but you all already deduced that it looks like.
  2. Zephrer
    I'd like to sign up, I'll give my persona a name and occupation when I have a little more time.
  3. Zephrer
    Sorry I haven't been all that active in posting, I wanted my first post to be a RP, but it's not finished... So I suppose it'll be my next post
  4. Zephrer
    Ah, I've been waiting for this. I'm really excited to have time to get back into SE again. Signing up as Alkazar, an exiled Sand Mastrell from Taldain
  5. Zephrer
    Where did everyone go?
  6. Zephrer
    Very well, my suspicions are: Creccio - I have no idea why, something just seems off about you. Ripple - for same reasons as before, I suspected Kas, and since you acquired his role I don't suspect you. And Stink - Mostly because I didn't trust you before, and I'm still suspicious. As I said before, I don't really have any proof. But you wanted my suspicions, so here they are.
  7. Zephrer
    Okay, first off... @clanky and Phatt I'd like to apologize for getting upset at you. I was having a really bad day... Even so, that's no excuse for my actions. I'm sorry... @Creccio. I have lots of suspicions, but I have not even the slightest amount of evidence to back it up. So it really wouldn't do much good to bring them up. (Besides, since the majority of the remaining players believe me to be an eliminator, my suspicions would be invalidated.) @everyone else alive I've offered all of my defenses and they've only served to make me more suspicious in your eyes. I'll not offer any more, because to do so would be counterproductive. @deathclutch. Sorry I suspected you, I couldn't be sure. But in the end, I'm glad you and I were on the same side. Thanks for believing me Well, This looks to be my final cycle. if this ends up being the case, thanks for letting me play with you guys. It's been fun
  8. Zephrer
    I'll not defend myself anymore. I've said everything, and if you still don't believe me and think I'm Skaa, then either lynch me or coinshot me.
  9. Zephrer
    Idols Domi, Clanky. Kill me then. This is my second game, and I'm bound to make some mistakes with logic or grammar. This is like Ripple's first death all over again. Do you want me to admit I'm Skaa? I won't, because I'm NOT Skaa. I'm an inquisitor, Storm it!
  10. Zephrer
    @clanky If Death is Skaa, then he can communicate through the doc, assuming the coinshot is Skaa as well. I was just covering all of our options, and possibilities. As for why I haven't voted for death. If I had voted for him last cycle, he would be dead now, but we've lost so many inquisitors that I was unwilling to kill someone who there was a possibility of being innocent. Just because I'm not convinced of it, doesn't mean that I am right. I'm just being cautious. @Phatt. There is little chance that there are two Inquisitor Augurs, but there's also the possibility that you are in fact Skaa, and I am innocent. (I'm on mobile so I'll put your name in red as soon as I can) I'm not Skaa, I'm an inquisitor Augur. Kill me if you must, but I am innocent. Edit: fixing grammatical errors
  11. Zephrer
    @stink Deathclutch only just started claiming the kills. So the other coinshot might not have gotten around to killing him yet. @deathclutch. It proves that you're a coinshot (or are working with one), but it really doesn't tell us much about your alignment. I'm not convinced yet that either of you are innocent.
  12. Zephrer
    Why does everyone assume that deathclutch is the Inquisitor coinshot? Just because he claimed to have killed those two Skaa does not mean that he actually did. He could very easily be the Skaa coinshot, and the other coinshot could just be laying low. Why wouldn't the other coinshot come out and call out deathclutch, you might ask? Perhaps because they still have charges and don't want to be killed by the Skaa. I know you probably won't believe me, seeing as I'm still under suspicion of being Skaa. But at least consider the possibility.
  13. Zephrer
    @clanky whoops, you're right. I misread that. Sorry Honey Badger, that was my bad. I had three vials as well. I this the amount of vials was dependent upon the power you were assigned, but I could be wrong. I don't think that it was random, though I wouldn't put it past Gamma to have done that just to mess with us.
  14. Zephrer
    @Honey Badger Gamma said this was a role-madness game, so everyone has a role of some sort. Claiming you might not have one is somewhat suspicious in my mind, but I'll give you benefit of the doubt and just assume it was a mistake... But I agree that keeping your role hidden as long as possible (while not always the most trust promoting thing to do) is very wise. No need to provide the eliminators with information on whom they should kill.
  15. Zephrer
    @deathclutch He does look suspicious, but he has also defended himself very well... I don't trust him, but I don't really know him well enough to determine his alignment... However, the way he has deflected suspicion up to now has left me thinking that he most likely Skaa... But I'm not certain by any means. Edit: added @deathclutch
  16. Zephrer
    @deathclutch What you have read into what I posted is far more than what the intent of my posts were. They weren't meant to shrug off suspicion, they were meant to show my suspicions before I ended up getting lynched. Though I must admit that what you drew out regarding my role is correct, even if I didn't even realize I knew about the seeker until you pointed it out. I might as well reveal my role, as its of little use to me now since its in the open: I'm the inquisitor Augur, and I have two charges left.
  17. Zephrer
    In all honesty, if I didn't defend myself would I look any less suspicious? I'm darned if I do and darned if I don't. I've said my defense, I will say no more on it. But I will name those whom I am currently suspicious of and why. They are: Creccio - your actions in the thread have been very suspicious. (Most of my reasoning is in my defense above) Ripple. - I don't trust you because I didn't trust Kas. I believed Kas to be an eliminator, and you have inherited his role. Deathclutch - I'm not sure why I don't trust you, but I don't... Hopefully I'll get some evidence to either clear or condemn you before I'm lynched or killed by the Skaa Wyrm - you said you would have a seeker watch me as I burned a metal last cycle, which conveniently didn't happen. (Granted it's possible that there was a communications issue, and as such I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. So I suspect you the least, but I don't trust you) Okay, I've presented my intuitions, evidences, etc. take them as you may, but if I'm not a Skaa, as I claim, you would do well to at least look into them.
  18. Zephrer
    Idos Domi! what is it going to take for you guys to realize that I'm an inquisitor?
  19. Zephrer
    We did learn a few things from Joe's death. First: Joe was not an eliminator. Therefore, the big plan he had was actually him trying to help. Second: Despite your suspicions that Joe and I were in league together as eliminators, Joe was obviously not involved in a plot to get Kas lynched for eliminator reasons (See Cycle two if you missed that part). though I wish Joe hadn't died, I will use the evidence to help my defense: Why would I try to get Kas lynched, with only Joe backing me up (which was not planned, as is now clear)? Shouldn't the other eliminators have tried to defend/assist me, or at least try to support me in the lynching or avert some measure of suspicion? They almost certainly would try to protect me if I was an eliminator, because it would hurt them to lose an eliminator no matter how inexperienced Therefore, I think it's rather safe to say that it's reasonable to assume I'm most likely not Skaa. (granted this is not the best defense, but under the circumstances it is the best I have.) @Creccio Despite the fact that the suspicion on me is heavy, I am still an active player and as such will retain the knowledge of my power to myself. Revealing it would only serve to either paint a bigger target on me than I have now, or turn me into a completely useless player allomantically. Neither of which I am willing to become. However I am becoming increasingly suspicious of you, Creccio. why are so interested in discovering everyone else's power? Why do you want me to reveal it so badly, enough to threaten me with a lynch, when you'd find out if I was lynched anyway? I think you want suspicion on me to avoid suspicion on actual eliminators, and I think that you are Skaa. Edit: greened out my vote
  20. Zephrer
    @creccio As it stands, I would rather not say what I was burning. Despite the fact that I'll probably end up being lynched, I don't like the idea of revealing my power.
  21. Zephrer
    Nice job, whoever got Citona @clanky Nothing I can say will help me. I've explained that the reason I posted what I did (outside of my accusation of Kas) was to promote discussion, because activity was low on the thread. Yet no one has believed my explanation. I burned a charge of my metal last night in case a seeker was watching, but I doubt this happened. I don't see what good any further defense would do. If you truly wish me dead as proof, go for it. You will have lost another inquisitor. But no hard feelings
  22. Zephrer
    I don't have much to defend myself with except my word, which doesn't amount to much in SE. I suppose I could reveal my role, but that would only make me a target, and you still most likely wouldn't trust me, believing me to be the Skaa equivalent of that role. I'm not good at making analyses, or statistics, and I honestly don't know enough about most of the players to give any helpful information. All I can do is try and help keep things moving along, when there's no participation in the thread. I guess you'll just have to lynch me to prove my innocence.
  23. Zephrer
    @clanky. You have a valid point, And i'd be surprised if you DIDN'T suspect me. But what you indicated isn't my style of play. I am an inquisitor, I assure you. unfortunately... I have no Way to prove it...
  24. Zephrer
    Welcome back Ripple. Okay, let's get some discussion going. We have two more dead inquisitors and if things keep going like this, the Skaa will most certainly win. Obviously this is not a good option (unless you're Skaa). So how do we propose to deal with the Skaa?
  25. Zephrer
    @Kas I really don't know why I'm suspicious of you, I just am. Though to be perfectly honest the purpose of my post was not to arouse suspicion of Kas or get a defense. The idea was to place my suspicions in public, and see who jumped at the opportunity to get at Kas. So far it's only Joe, and everyone is highly suspicious of him anyway, so the plan didn't work quite as well as I hoped...
×
×
  • Create New...