Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

LG112 - Pseudocycle One: Closed For Minor Restructuring 

<Attention, attention, Silverlight will be destroyed in sixteen minutes, repeat, Silverlight will be destroyed in sixteen minutes. All mortal entities are encouraged to flee before destruction or else risk being sent to a completely random location.>

~ (PseudoGM provided)

I write these words in steel, for anything not set in metal cannot be trusted.

Dearest reader,

I am dying. Every day, His hold grows on them. The end nears, I know it. I have failed. But there is yet a story to be told.

This story begins like many others, in a town that has seen many such stories. It is a tale as old as our struggle, our eternal game of chess. It is a tale of human hearts, standing proudly against a monster that approaches from beyond - and a monster that haunts from within:

You, dear reader, have undoubtedly heard this tale before. And yet- maybe it is my heart, grown weak with age. Maybe it is that this time, I traveled to the town filled with sorrow, and found something that awakened a long-dead soul within me. But there is something about this story in particular that has stuck with me, even now, as I grow too weak to write, as the mists become my only companion.

Still, I find the strength to scratch these words, in the hopes that you will someday read them.

Listen closely, dear reader.

Our story begins, like many others, in Tyrian Falls.

Then they took to the stars.

~ (End of PseudoGM provided)

Welcome to AG##! Players are reminded to reupdate themselves on the rules for anonymous games, found in your GMPMs.

Things to Note:

There are no Living Tineyes. PM's are closed this cycle.

You should have already received and logged into your Anon accounts, and role PMs will be sent in short order. Please notify @A Jo in the Bush or myself if you face any technical issues.

Remember not to post in this thread with your main account! If you do, edit the content to a "." And report and hide it.

Please do not touch, delete, or edit any PM in your inbox titled Logbook. 

The IM for this game is @Little Wilson. Please reach out to her if you have concerns.

This turn will close on Tuesday the 6th of January, at 9:00 AM Central Time/7 AM Pacific/15 GMT.

Have fun!

~

(The above is copied from the AG, please disregard)

The Pseudogame has begun! All of you should now have your Pseudoroles and alignments. If you don't, once again, PM/@ me and/or Wahr. 

All Tyrian role descriptions have been preserved, so the descriptions are slightly inaccurate. Day and Night no longer exist, so anything that says Day or Night can just be considered to say Pseudocycle mechanically.

PMs are open.

This cycle will end in two days at 11:00 AM Central Time on Friday the 29th of May.

Edit: We will be using spreadsheet voting! While you're still encouraged to vote in thread, only votes in the below spreadsheet will be counted. There are comments to help you, but here's an overview 

You will only ever need to edit the row with your name, please do not edit the others. You can ignore the Final Vote column. You will add your first vote in the Vote One column. If that's your final vote, then that's all you need to do, but if you switch your vote, you'll add your next vote to the Vote Two column, leaving your original vote as a record. So on and so forth for any additional vote switches.

Please PM or @ me with any questions. 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cMeWgmdFF1wIMvdarcGzO-efTaneucpy1y_zoZEjV5o/edit?usp=drivesdk

Players:

Spoiler
  1. @coco.pudding as Coco
  2. @Through The Living Star as Star
  3. @CoderDrag0n8 as Coder
  4. @Myst as Mistake
  5. @StrikerEZ as Striker
  6. @Qianweilian as Qianweilian 
  7. @Through the Living Hopper as Hopper
  8. @CadCom as Cam
  9. @Verdance as Verdance
  10. @TwinStorm as TwinStorm
  11. @Hoid Slayer as Hoid Slayer
  12. @___ as Mippo
  13. @xinoehp512 as Xinoehp512
  14. @Araris Valerian as Araris Valerian 
  15. @|TJ| as TJ
  16. @Kit_Kat as Kit Kat
  17. @Questioning Lettuce as Questioning Lettuce
  18. @Miss Fallen

 

Edited by The Unknown Medallion
Posted

Reminder regarding the PMs and Tineye:

The Tineye only influences the Ability to PM if one or both Participants of the PM die in the Metagame

Players that are alive in the Metagame are not effected by the Tineye

Players that are dead in both Games cannot PM

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Through the living Wahr said:

Reminder regarding the PMs and Tineye:

The Tineye only influences the Ability to PM if one or both Participants of the PM die in the Metagame

Players that are alive in the Metagame are not effected by the Tineye

Players that are dead in both Games cannot PM

 

 

So I'd like to confirm that Tineyes still exist in the pseudogame, as the text saying all were dead is supposed to be disregarded?

Posted
1 minute ago, Qianweilian said:

So I'd like to confirm that Tineyes still exist in the pseudogame, as the text saying all were dead is supposed to be disregarded?

Yes, the italicized text is flavor.

PMs are open as per

18 minutes ago, The Unknown Medallion said:

PMs are open.

Below

Posted

Well, I guess we better get this insanity started. Gonna toss a vote on CadCom because I don’t think I’ve seen him show up yet. @CadCom get in here pops. :P

Posted
18 minutes ago, The Unknown Medallion said:

Yes, the italicized text is flavor.

PMs are open as per

Below

Oh. Ooh. I didn't see that, sorry.

Posted
4 minutes ago, StrikerEZ said:

Well, I guess we better get this insanity started. Gonna toss a vote on CadCom because I don’t think I’ve seen him show up yet. @CadCom get in here pops. :P

I forgot, we're doing spreadsheet voting!

Here's the sheet, an explanation and the link will be added to the main writeup momentarily 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cMeWgmdFF1wIMvdarcGzO-efTaneucpy1y_zoZEjV5o/edit?usp=drivesdk

Posted

‘Chaos’!?

this is difficult enough to understand 

Posted

Wait so is there a night cycle in the PG?

Oh oops I just saw 

Also I'm kinda confused by the PM situation, are there like two different types of PMs for the MG and the PG?

Do we name them differently?

Posted

Do we need to ping people when we vote them? Or do we just be like, figure it out and look 

Posted
Just now, Myst said:

Do we need to ping people when we vote them? Or do we just be like, figure it out and look 

I feel bad for the GMs 😭

Posted
16 minutes ago, ___ said:

Wait so is there a night cycle in the PG?

Oh oops I just saw 

Also I'm kinda confused by the PM situation, are there like two different types of PMs for the MG and the PG?

Do we name them differently?

You dont split up your PMs each oy you can make one PM with each Player. If both Players in a PM are alive in the Meta Game all is good and they can PM with each other to their hearts desire. 

If one or both of them die in the Meta Game they will need a living Tineye to continue PMing 

10 minutes ago, ___ said:

I feel bad for the GMs 😭

Why do you feel bad? From a GM Perspective the Spreedsheet makes it so much easier then searching through the Thread for who voted on whom

 

15 minutes ago, Myst said:

Do we need to ping people when we vote them? Or do we just be like, figure it out and look 

Do it however you want, just make sure to enter your Votes in the Spreadsheet, they wont count otherwise. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, ___ said:

I feel bad for the GMs 😭

The GMs should feel bad for me 🥺

Posted

Are we discussing our thoughts on the elim bet now? Bc I have thoughts. And there’s no way discussion can change the bet now, which seemed to be the primary issue last cycle.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Through the living Wahr said:

You dont split up your PMs each oy you can make one PM with each Player. If both Players in a PM are alive in the Meta Game all is good and they can PM with each other to their hearts desire. 

If one or both of them die in the Meta Game they will need a living Tineye to continue PMing 

Ah understood

40 minutes ago, Through the living Wahr said:

Why do you feel bad? From a GM Perspective the Spreedsheet makes it so much easier then searching through the Thread for who voted on whom

No because of the sheer volume of questions

7 minutes ago, coco.pudding said:

Are we discussing our thoughts on the elim bet now? Bc I have thoughts. And there’s no way discussion can change the bet now, which seemed to be the primary issue last cycle.

Sure let's hear the thoughts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, coco.pudding said:

Are we discussing our thoughts on the elim bet now? Bc I have thoughts. And there’s no way discussion can change the bet now, which seemed to be the primary issue last cycle.

Yeah, what are you thinking?
I'd lean towards an elim bet, because it would likely be much easier to fold as an elim, but I could also see it being village.

Edit: sorry, I mean village bet, lol, not elim bet

Edited by Qianweilian
Posted (edited)

Honestly I’m considering just going hard on the Elim’s choosing a particular bet(not sure which) and then depending on how well that seems to be working, going against it.

Contrary to what I said in thread yesterday, I think they’ll have gone with a pseudo Elim bet

edit: sorry, pseudo village win

Edited by Myst
Posted

For why I think they’d have gone with a pseudo village win for the bet:

1. Everyone was talking about how a pseudo Elim was better

2. it’s possible to have the villagers win as early as pseudo day 2(not accounting for any coinshot help) as long as one Meta elim is also a pseudo Elim.

3. In the case the Meta Elim’s aren’t going for a fast game(for whatever reason), it’s a lot harder for us to anti-rig. Them killing off 4 pseudo Elim’s is a lot harder to stop than trying to reach village Elim parity.

the village wincon requires 4ish(I’ve been debating between 4-5 Elim’s) deaths, while the Elim wincon requires up to 12.

One of those is way easier to do

Posted

Yk what we could just do is everyone reveals their alignment, we choose a direction to go, start killing people off and wait and see what the reaction is, then change course accordingly

Posted

If we do do that I suggest killing off villagers, if I’m right, we’re making progress, and if I’m not we have the most time to course correct.

That said, this only works if everyone agrees with this

Posted
15 hours ago, StrikerEZ said:

I personally think it’s actually simpler than it seems:

If game go too good for PseudoVillage, then MetaVillage (some of whom will be PseudoVillage and PseudoElim) try to make PseudoElim win. And vice versa.

I think this is village. 

I see Striker was asking about my earlier evil-read, it was just gut, you seemed a bit hesitant in your wordings, but I guess I just haven't played with you recently, and it might just be that. 

15 minutes ago, Myst said:

For why I think they’d have gone with a pseudo village win for the bet:

1. Everyone was talking about how a pseudo Elim was better

2. it’s possible to have the villagers win as early as pseudo day 2(not accounting for any coinshot help) as long as one Meta elim is also a pseudo Elim.

3. In the case the Meta Elim’s aren’t going for a fast game(for whatever reason), it’s a lot harder for us to anti-rig. Them killing off 4 pseudo Elim’s is a lot harder to stop than trying to reach village Elim parity.

the village wincon requires 4ish(I’ve been debating between 4-5 Elim’s) deaths, while the Elim wincon requires up to 12.

One of those is way easier to do

I might agree with the above sentiment (if you are saying that they have more incentive to bet on the pseudo-village victory). Banking on percentage, it is more likely to have at least 1 meta-elim be pseudo-elim than all meta-elims be pseudo-villagers. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, |TJ| said:

I might agree with the above sentiment (if you are saying that they have more incentive to bet on the pseudo-village victory). Banking on percentage, it is more likely to have at least 1 meta-elim be pseudo-elim than all meta-elims be pseudo-villagers. 

Yeah, that’s pretty much it. It’s easier, they have an incentive, it works whether your comfortable with a slow or fast game, and so I think that’s how they’ll have gone

Posted
6 minutes ago, ___ said:

Yk what we could just do is everyone reveals their alignment, we choose a direction to go, start killing people off and wait and see what the reaction is, then change course accordingly

I’ll go first

I’m a Villager

😁🔪

29 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said:

Araris Valerian

On the move, will figure this spreadsheet thing out later

Okay so as it turns out I cannot edit the spreadsheet on my phone but I am voting Araris and I will note it down when I get home

1 minute ago, Myst said:

If we do do that I suggest killing off villagers, if I’m right, we’re making progress, and if I’m not we have the most time to course correct.

That said, this only works if everyone agrees with this

Wait what? Explanation?

Evinir Cragborn stepped through the Perpendicularity, and joined the arriving crowd. A cloak obscuring his features, he blended into the mass and moved as quickly as he could to exit the station.

The entire trip from Silverlight, he had worried they were after him. But no. It seemed his secret remained. That was good. He had hidden it for centuries.

He could hide it a while longer.

Evinir left the station, and began to wander the streets. As he walked out into the light of the sun, he closed his eyes, and brushed the flowers at his side with the tips of his fingers. With his Life Sense, granted by the many Breaths he had accumulated over the years - the same Breaths that kept him alive - he reached out and Felt each one, Felt them reach out a little as he neared.

Oh, how painful this perfection was.

His eyes opened again.

The monsters that had destroyed Silverlight might not have been after him in specific, but they still loomed. And like it or not, Evinir was one of the few in the Cosmere capable of standing up to them. His old mentor had made sure of that.

Evinir took a deep breath, and brushed the flowers one last time. Then he resumed his quick pace, and began to search for somewhere he could work from.

12 minutes ago, |TJ| said:

I might agree with the above sentiment (if you are saying that they have more incentive to bet on the pseudo-village victory). Banking on percentage, it is more likely to have at least 1 meta-elim be pseudo-elim than all meta-elims be pseudo-villagers

Ahh I get

I feel like we should at least pay this game the respect of some facsimile of reality, however, rather than just systematically getting rid of players until the meta elims are forced to do something about it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...