-
Posts
567 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by coco.pudding
-
Oh good I was literally writing that on my five minute water/shade breaks so I was worried it was terrible lol
-
Only twice So did I but I did a silly and went for the not as good version
-
Holy that was a crazy game I was stressing so much. ‘Twas very fun though. @The Unknown Character @CoderDrag0n8 Thanks for being great fellow elims. Sorry for getting y’all killed I still feel really bad about that. Hopefully I’ve redeemed myself by winning. @Mystic sorry you couldn’t trust me again this game. Hopefully next time. Thanks! I was actually so worried you were going to convince Star to vote for me. Then it would have come down do a tie which would have been pretty crazy. @Archer are you glad I got the chalk? Also thanks for gming this was a fun game!
-
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Yeah ik you said that. And it’s probably true. But unfortunately that’s just how the game goes sometimes. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I think she’s talking about the timing of some of your pop ins and votes throughout the game. Some of that timing has been rather odd/suspicious. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Never said it was, just that it would have been if we got the rebuke, and you were essentially saying it didn’t matter if we got a rebuke or not. It very much did. That’s what I find suspicious. I find it hilarious how many people share this sentiment I will try to find a few posts when I have time later today if that’s helpful. I’m planning to go back through both of your posts as well so I can get a more solid vote put down -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Damn. I felt like TJ’s defending TUC like that might mean he wasn't elim but I went with it anyway. Sorry TJ. Glad we didn’t get a rebuke. That would have ended the game if I’m not mistaken. Thank you to whoever gave favor. I was stressing about that a bit haha So. We’re down to three. There are things that I have found suspicious about both of you at some point or another. But I think I agree with TJ’s comment last cycle about Hopper. I don’t love how you were talking about it being fine if we misexed there when that very well could have been lylo. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Wait so this is actually lylo if that happens Bc there’s five players left. Assuming even just one elim, if we misexe and the elims kill plus rebuke death they get parity and win I cannot give favor, I’ve been having terrible luck on items and used my one favor item last cycle. But I agree we should try to get two. In the meantime I’ll try to get the key or boast so I can add favor next cycle if we get there. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Okay ig I could see that -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Four elims seems absurd for a game this size -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Since he was pushing so hard to defend TUC I feel like it has to be TJ right? But I also feel like e!TJ is smarter than that, and would know that as soon as TUC flipped elim he would be the next target…so idk. I’m gonna vote on him for now but that may change later. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Yeah that seems like a reasonable idea -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I did. That’s what’s making me struggle so much. On the one hand I think your argument makes a lot of sense. On the other hand I’ve been sus of TUC for multiple cycles now and the fact that you’re pulling attention off him leads me to believe you could be the last elim. So I don’t know what to do now. I’m also not sure it matters. TUC has so many votes atp he’s almost certainly going out. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
What is this referring to? The tie idea is an interesting one. I’m not sure what the votes are atm but I could be willing to switch to facilitate that. I think it could make sense to see who the elims decide to save. Although if this is lylo maybe that’s a bad idea… -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
In cycle two he and Illwei had a conversation about Coder in which it came out that TUC and Coder had been discussing Illwei being a returning player. This was assumed to be a slip where Coder was talking about a conversation that happened in the elim doc, since that’s not really something that would come up naturally in a pm. So that already didn’t look great but with Coder having flipped elim…it looks pretty bad. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Yes, I will give favor this turn -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
He just accused you of being elim and your response is to clear him? That’s definitely a new one. To be clear though, you are saying you were roleblocked? (And notified of it) -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I can (finally) give favor this cycle. I think the next most likely elim is probably TUC? That whole thing with Coder and Illwei looks pretty bad now that we know Coder was elim. I also think we can clear Hoid pretty solidly. Unless he was hard bussing for some reason (which really doesn’t make sense atp in the game) he just outed an elim and that clears him in my eyes. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I mean, yeah, but at least I was trying to be caught up in thread and offering at least a little bit of my thoughts rather than just being inactive. I was hecka busy but at least I was trying? Anyways I am also somewhat worried about the favor situation. I am unable to provide any but will be going for the boast this cycle so hopefully I can next cycle. I don’t think we should just be giving a free rebuke. We only get three and getting enough favor is only going to get harder as more villagers die (yes, exeing elims will help with this but I don’t think it will be as much as we would like)- 465 replies
-
- what a weiste
- wei too many dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Damn, okay At least you’re honest about it- 465 replies
-
- what a weiste
- wei too many dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Definitely something to look into. I already thought that whole interaction seemed suspicious—now that Coder is almost certainly elim, it looks pretty damning.- 465 replies
-
- what a weiste
- wei too many dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Okay, that was a lot to come back to. I don’t see e!Hoid lying about this. The elims aren’t even close to winning atp so that would be an incredibly dumb gambit to try. So Coder- 465 replies
-
- what a weiste
- wei too many dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Um, none taken I think? Why are you voting him if you don’t think he’s going to flip elim? A reminder that this is relatively normal village Qian behavior for those who have not played with him very much. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Okay cool Yeah I had misremembered the item taking/using rules earlier when I volunteered lol -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Are you going to add favor? You volunteered earlier, yes? If you and Qian both can we only need one more. (Technically we’re good but insurance is nice)
