-
Posts
567 -
Joined
-
Last visited
coco.pudding's Achievements
159
Reputation
-
Oh good I was literally writing that on my five minute water/shade breaks so I was worried it was terrible lol
-
Only twice So did I but I did a silly and went for the not as good version
-
coco.pudding started following MR77: Cycle Five: Manifest Destiny and MR77: Aftermath: Ghost Ship
-
Holy that was a crazy game I was stressing so much. ‘Twas very fun though. @The Unknown Character @CoderDrag0n8 Thanks for being great fellow elims. Sorry for getting y’all killed I still feel really bad about that. Hopefully I’ve redeemed myself by winning. @Mystic sorry you couldn’t trust me again this game. Hopefully next time. Thanks! I was actually so worried you were going to convince Star to vote for me. Then it would have come down do a tie which would have been pretty crazy. @Archer are you glad I got the chalk? Also thanks for gming this was a fun game!
-
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Yeah ik you said that. And it’s probably true. But unfortunately that’s just how the game goes sometimes. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I think she’s talking about the timing of some of your pop ins and votes throughout the game. Some of that timing has been rather odd/suspicious. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Never said it was, just that it would have been if we got the rebuke, and you were essentially saying it didn’t matter if we got a rebuke or not. It very much did. That’s what I find suspicious. I find it hilarious how many people share this sentiment I will try to find a few posts when I have time later today if that’s helpful. I’m planning to go back through both of your posts as well so I can get a more solid vote put down -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Damn. I felt like TJ’s defending TUC like that might mean he wasn't elim but I went with it anyway. Sorry TJ. Glad we didn’t get a rebuke. That would have ended the game if I’m not mistaken. Thank you to whoever gave favor. I was stressing about that a bit haha So. We’re down to three. There are things that I have found suspicious about both of you at some point or another. But I think I agree with TJ’s comment last cycle about Hopper. I don’t love how you were talking about it being fine if we misexed there when that very well could have been lylo. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Wait so this is actually lylo if that happens Bc there’s five players left. Assuming even just one elim, if we misexe and the elims kill plus rebuke death they get parity and win I cannot give favor, I’ve been having terrible luck on items and used my one favor item last cycle. But I agree we should try to get two. In the meantime I’ll try to get the key or boast so I can add favor next cycle if we get there. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Okay ig I could see that -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Four elims seems absurd for a game this size -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Since he was pushing so hard to defend TUC I feel like it has to be TJ right? But I also feel like e!TJ is smarter than that, and would know that as soon as TUC flipped elim he would be the next target…so idk. I’m gonna vote on him for now but that may change later. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Yeah that seems like a reasonable idea -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I did. That’s what’s making me struggle so much. On the one hand I think your argument makes a lot of sense. On the other hand I’ve been sus of TUC for multiple cycles now and the fact that you’re pulling attention off him leads me to believe you could be the last elim. So I don’t know what to do now. I’m also not sure it matters. TUC has so many votes atp he’s almost certainly going out. -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
What is this referring to? The tie idea is an interesting one. I’m not sure what the votes are atm but I could be willing to switch to facilitate that. I think it could make sense to see who the elims decide to save. Although if this is lylo maybe that’s a bad idea… -
Mid-Range Game 77: Traders & Traitors
coco.pudding replied to Archer's topic in Sanderson Elimination
In cycle two he and Illwei had a conversation about Coder in which it came out that TUC and Coder had been discussing Illwei being a returning player. This was assumed to be a slip where Coder was talking about a conversation that happened in the elim doc, since that’s not really something that would come up naturally in a pm. So that already didn’t look great but with Coder having flipped elim…it looks pretty bad.
