Jump to content

coco.pudding

Members
  • Posts

    463
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Pronouns
    she/they

coco.pudding's Achievements

144

Reputation

  1. Bc I didn’t like his reasoning And I think it’s fishy that he just “happened” to kill an elim when the general consensus at the time was “the meta elims bet on a village win.” And I agree with the logic that exeing him here gives us good information. Whichever way he flips will tell us something useful. And he can still talk in thread after, so if he isn’t an elim, he can still provide useful information and strategy ideas. Also, I think an exe is better than no exe, and he’s the only option that can actually win right now.
  2. It’s bc he lied about his role and about killing Xino. He has since explained his reasoning, but still.
  3. Do you not? I’d say it’s pretty obvious
  4. Okay so I think the obvious question here is @Myst why’d you lie about your role?
  5. I don’t know. I was thinking village but apparently there’s some good reasoning for it to be elim, which I’ve been promised will be shared next cycle. So I’m rather confused also (that’s lowkey why I haven’t started any trains or anything like that this game, I genuinely don’t know what the strategy should be for voting and it’s kind of frying my brain) I do think we should do Myst today and then exe Hoid next cycle. Only because I think Myst is lying and if we wait until next cycle there’s a very good chance the pseudoGM changes his role and then we never know if he is lying or not unless the pseudoIM comes forward.
  6. He’s seemed village to me too. But I don’t like that he’s (probably) lying about his role. And I didn’t like his reaction to the accusation of said lying. A villager really has no reason to lie about this. Yes. But. If we don’t exe Myst today his role probably gets changed and we never know if he’s lying. So we should come back to the Hoid exe next cycle. Girl what about me? I’m here too!
  7. Yeah i know thats why i was confused
  8. Uh, no. A collective “we” meaning everyone. Unless you haven’t been working under that assumption for some reason?
  9. Huh. That is quite the theory. Ig I could see that. It would depend on them wanting a pseudo elim victory though, which has not been the general consensus by my understanding. SLAYER!!! (sorry Ik I’m not the Slayerman but I have to know if this is the right reference) okay I see some people have already mentioned ren faires. This is good. We’ve been working under the assumption that there’s a mole this whole time.
  10. I can also attest to this. Unfortunately it doesn’t prove that that “better use” wasnt killing Xino. We can’t prove that Myst is a lurcher or coinshot without exeing him Me personally I think he’s probably lying so Verdance Myst (I still want to come back to Ver later, I do think exeing the meta elims in pseudogame is a good idea. But I agree with the whole “mysts role could get changed to frame the claimer” thing so this has to be now. We can exe Ver in the next cycle.)
  11. If you’re not a coinshot, what is your role?
  12. That’s…really devious And yeah ig that could be a viable strategy…until we exe all of them in the pseudogame where there isn’t a vote requirement
  13. Okay yeah I’ll check on it again tomorrow was just thinking it’s a good idea to keep the number of votes low like striker said although with this one ig numbers probably won’t be an issue
  14. Oh I forgot that’s a thing thanks should I also remove my vote?
×
×
  • Create New...