Jump to content

Quick Fix 74: Ain't Nobody Got Time For That


Recommended Posts

Posted

The Suspicious Man carefully eyed the criminals that he was trapped with, examining each and every one, trying to decide which of them were the biggest threats. Most of them didn't seem to have the slightly clue what was going on, or who was a threat, but some of them were definitely prepared for violence.

First, there was Tomias, the leader of this terrible bunch, a grim man who was content to incite violence, as long as he was kept out of it. That one would have to go eventually, but if he went, the speedbubble would pop and everyone else would scatter.

Then there was that woman, The Nameless Whisper, who had been very carefully and secretly watching him ever since she showed up. He resolved to keep an eye on her as much as he could, since she seemed to be focused on him for no good reason.

The Enforcer seemed trustworthy, at least insofar as he was willing to accept the cards as a valid method of finding a traitor. The Suspicious Man decided to not pay too much attention to them for now.

The next one was much more worrying. The Crazed was a wildcard, no one seemed to know why he was here, only that he was entertaining. His jokes were suspiciously good. He wondered if The Crazed had been stalking him to learn his sense of humor.

Exp was obviously a traitor, since only the lowest of the low would draw the lowest of the cards, and therefor Exp was a safe bet to direct everyone's attention to. That bomb of his was going to be a problem, but Nameless Whisper seemed confident that she could stealth it out of his hand when it came time to kill him, so maybe that problem would solve itself.

The eldest of the gang, Foss, Twice Fooled, Once Crazy, had a thousand-yard stare that made The Suspicious Man suspect he would welcome death, and therefore wasn't a threat either.

Luckily for an undercover conner like himself, there was another undercover conner in the gang, Johnny Goodman, who he could therefore trust with his life and his wallet. No further analysis necessary.

One of the more dangerous gang-members was Billy Joe, a pewterarm, and therefore worth at least 5 men in such close quarters as this. Suspicious carefully sidled further away from the man, though he didn't seem dangerous right now, as he hadn't voiced any suspicions, which was, of course, suspicious.

Steel was, well, that man defied description. He seemed to be following Billy Joe around, which meant he was more likely to be a traitor, because he was either following Billy Joe around to kill him, or because he was following Billy Joe around to protect him. Regular Criminals didn't follow around other regular criminals like that.

Le Flambeur was a wonderful man with excellent taste, and The Suspicious Man didn't see any good reason to target a gambler right now. Surely the man would do something foolish all on his own.

He wasn't certain what to make of Human, but he trusted the man on the basis of also lying about being Koloss-Blooded. Since he, a lawman, was lying about that, it said good things about others who lied about it.

Lamron looked to be no trouble at all, being foolish enough to sit down in what could easily erupt into a full firefight. The man wouldn't be pulling a gun anytime soon.

The Suspicious Man nodded, fairly certain that his excellent lawman talents had immediately figured out who the traitors were. Exp, The Nameless Whisper, and Steel. There was a slight chance he was wrong about one or two of them, in which case The Crazed or Billy Joe were probably the Turncoats instead.

5 hours ago, Experience said:

"Why don't you give us a reason for why you messed with those cards? Why were you trying to set me up?"

1 hour ago, Nemoras Enchanted Easel said:

"What makes you believe he tampered with the cards? He laid them out, and we each chose one at random. Did he have some way to manipulate your hand into choosing the card he wished?" "Then again...It is quite suspicious of you to have put about a game of roulette with cards, and having them so readily available. Almost like it could have been a planned decision?"

"I plan all my decisions in advance, as any smart people would do." He hefted his deck of cards, with their custom faces. "But I would never rig a gamble. A man who cheats at gambling while among criminals is certain to live a very short life." He tossed the deck in the general direction of his two accusers. One of them would probably catch it. "Check for yourself, no setup, cleanly shuffled."

He elbowed Le Flambeur, hoping to get some backup. "Come on @|TJ|, tell them how stupid it is to try to cheat at cards in a criminal gang."

 

(Is all my analysis based entirely on roleplay, most of which happened before alignments were even started? Yes it is. What else am I supposed to do on day 1? I admit to some surprise that Exp hasn't voted on me or KelsierApologist yet, like I assumed would happen. It's almost enough to make me take my vote off them, since the RP was an obvious way to make a vote without suspicion, but the fact that they had a bomb and didn't use it when the rival gang attacked us is still worth voting on.)

Posted
18 minutes ago, A Joe in the Bush said:

"I plan all my decisions in advance, as any smart people would do." He hefted his deck of cards, with their custom faces. "But I would never rig a gamble. A man who cheats at gambling while among criminals is certain to live a very short life." He tossed the deck in the general direction of his two accusers. One of them would probably catch it. "Check for yourself, no setup, cleanly shuffled."

"Unless, of course, the criminal thought themselves to be smarter than the others. Assuming you are the smartest person in the room is a gamble, sure. But a gamble is always one step away from being an assured outcome if that assumption is correct. Most criminals just punch at thing someone points towards. Very few of them come up with deep cunning plans by themselves. In fact, I'd say it is quite easy to be smarter almost all criminals. Not to say that I promote cheating in cards, but just that... gambling isn't always truly 'gambling', ya know?

The Suspicious Man was the first person to voice his opinions publicly (read: voted red in-thread), when there was no need to, and in fact, in the interest of the Turncoats to speak as quietly as possible (vote on the sheet keeping a low profile). The fact that Suspicious Man did so promoted/forced everyone, including possible Turncoats, to do so is a good look on him. 

I don't have an opinion on anyone else, expect a general bad feeling about the Enforcer

General thoughts about the situation - with this new way of voicing our suspicions, we will not be able to find out the exact time when others state their suspicion, which is going to be a hindrance. 

(Vote count analysis is going to be a bit difficult this game, we would not know if the players did vote when they said they did or if they actually voted after someone else voted, that's bit of a drawback to this style of voting)

Vote Count: 

Experience (2): A Joe in the Bush, KelsierApologist
#1 Taln Fan (1): Twinstorm
A Joe in the Bush (1): Nemoras Enchanted Easel
KelsierApologist (1): |TJ|
TheRavenHasLanded (1): Ashbringer

Post Count:

Polly - 1
Joe - 2
TwinStorm - 2
Exp - 1
Ash - 1
Nemora - 1
TJ - 1

Posted
1 hour ago, |TJ| said:

General thoughts about the situation - with this new way of voicing our suspicions, we will not be able to find out the exact time when others state their suspicion, which is going to be a hindrance. 

(Vote count analysis is going to be a bit difficult this game, we would not know if the players did vote when they said they did or if they actually voted after someone else voted, that's bit of a drawback to this style of voting)

(True - but we'll see retracted votes, so it'll really only be a thing if they didn't vote their target at all, or did vote for them after a time. Really it seems like a potential bussing capability? But other than that, not too much.)

 

The Human noticed there was a limited amount of time left to speak; he wondered if anyone would run out before someone's life did. Unlikely, he thought. Even 6 moments to compose remaining thoughts was a lot, all things considered.

Posted
2 hours ago, A Joe in the Bush said:

"I plan all my decisions in advance, as any smart people would do." He hefted his deck of cards, with their custom faces. "But I would never rig a gamble. A man who cheats at gambling while among criminals is certain to live a very short life." He tossed the deck in the general direction of his two accusers. One of them would probably catch it. "Check for yourself, no setup, cleanly shuffled."

Lamron found The Suspicious Man was indeed suspicious - interesting how that figured. Maybe he should have come up with a better name.

Lamron decided he might have to speak up, given that leaving the bendalloy bubble seemed less and less of an option. "It was all yer cards that started all this. And now we got a bomb hanging over our heads. Might as well do the traitor's job for them, eh?", he said as he pointed a stubby finger towards The Suspicious Man. "Also, why in the world is The a part of your name? 🤨"

2 hours ago, A Joe in the Bush said:

but the fact that they had a bomb and didn't use it when the rival gang attacked us is still worth voting on

Lamron didn't agree with this sentiment entirely. Sure, it was kind of odd that Exp reserved the bomb for use on their own gang mates - but out here it was almost always each for their own. He knew if he'd been threatened based on someone else's (manipulated!!!) deck of cards, then he'd probably loose it too. Maybe Exp was bluffing and the bomb did nothing, or maybe they were saving it for a special occasion, but he expected a bomb would have already done its damage in the hands of a traitor.

-------------------------

1 hour ago, |TJ| said:

The Suspicious Man was the first person to voice his opinions publicly (read: voted red in-thread), when there was no need to, and in fact, in the interest of the Turncoats to speak as quietly as possible (vote on the sheet keeping a low profile). The fact that Suspicious Man did so promoted/forced everyone, including possible Turncoats, to do so is a good look on him. 

...

General thoughts about the situation - with this new way of voicing our suspicions, we will not be able to find out the exact time when others state their suspicion, which is going to be a hindrance. 

It would be fairly suspicious to cast a vote in the sheet and not announce anything about it in the thread - anyone caught doing this would definitely get flak for it, probably being killed for being a turncoat as well (barring post limit shenanigans, of course). I don't think it's really alignment indicative that Suspicious explicitly voted. I expect he'd do the same regardless of whether he were gang or turncoat. In fact, he's being suspicious by not being suspicious by explicitly voting!! Which means he's being suspicious, so ... he's not suspicious... ? Uhhh, In don't think I want Lamron confused like that.

Yeah, I agree people can change their vote secretly and that's gonna be a slight hassle. I'd probably prefer if people tried to post their votes as much as possible. A gang member's strongest weapon is the information you generate, of course. I get that there'll have to be a compromise with the post limit, but still.

-----------------------------

Personally, I was leaning toward an Exp vote for RP reasons, but The Suspicious Man's getting mildly suspicious in my eyes, so 🤷‍♂️

Posted

Johnny definitely does not continue to keep quietly writing everything down in his notebook. He has a feeling that if he starts talking, he'll end up under suspicion that he definitely does not deserve. He would never betray the gang. He wasn't in favor of trying to use cards to predict the future, but he had no real suspicions of his own. Everyone here was a criminal and they all had secrets. His was definitely not that he was an undercover cop. He decided that if they were going to kill people, he should try to eliminate the people he didn't like very much, definitely not because they were suspicious that he was spying on them. That meant he should accuse The Crazed and Twice Fooled, Once Crazy. Something about them seemed off to him bothered him. Maybe it was their self proclaimed titles. Honestly, why did so many people in this gang have to go by some title or alias. It would make things much simpler if everyone used their legally given name. Definitely not because it would make it easier for police to identify them.

Posted

Lamron's head was spinning trying to figure out who wanted to kill whom. He thought he finally had the hang of it though. Most people wanted either one of the Suspicious card Man, the exploding sphere fellow or the crazy foolish guy dead. Lamron didn't really know why anyone suspected that last one. They hadn't even said anything meaningful yet. Maybe that's why? 

"Hey you! Why are your eyes still wide? You wanna say something? He shouted, perhaps unwisely, at the twice fooled once crazy man.

-------------------------------------------

Currently It's @Experience, @TheRavenHasLanded and @A Joe in the Bush who are in a 3 way tie for the vote at 2 counts each. I'm not entirely sure why Raven has 2 votes. But at least it'll be fun to see what happens next.

I'm not personally too worried about the post limit if I'm being honest. I don't think I make that many posts in a QF cycle on a good day. 

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, A Joe in the Bush said:

The Suspicious Man nodded, fairly certain that his excellent lawman talents had immediately figured out who the traitors were. Exp, The Nameless Whisper, and Steel. There was a slight chance he was wrong about one or two of them, in which case The Crazed or Billy Joe were probably the Turncoats instead.

The Enforcer took off his sunglasses again. Not because he wanted to be cool, but because he genuinely could not see a thing in the dark hideout. Blinking a bit, he whispered to the Suspicious Man, “If you’re accusing all these people, write all of them down, not just exp.”

He then turned to the gang and said, “Isn’t it mighty suspicious that this man is only really accusing exp? I figure that The Nameless Whisper and Steel might be the Suspicious Man’s partners in betrayal!”

We can vote multiple times, right?

1 hour ago, Lord Spirit said:

That meant he should accuse The Crazed and Twice Fooled, Once Crazy.

“You too, Johnny!” the Enforcer announced, “write down your votes or we’ll think you’re trying to distract us with crazy conclusions.”

Edited by KelsierApologist
hedged bets
Posted
8 hours ago, Ashbringer said:

(True - but we'll see retracted votes, so it'll really only be a thing if they didn't vote their target at all, or did vote for them after a time. Really it seems like a potential bussing capability? But other than that, not too much.)

(I meant more like figuring who was the 4th vote on the train - for example. Or if, later we find out a train is v/e, then who was the one who put either train in the lead. Of course, none of it is a problem if players vote in the sheet right before/after voting on thread. If that is not the case, we're likely to draw false conclusions.) 

7 hours ago, Mark IV said:

Lamron didn't agree with this sentiment entirely. Sure, it was kind of odd that Exp reserved the bomb for use on their own gang mates - but out here it was almost always each for their own. He knew if he'd been threatened based on someone else's (manipulated!!!) deck of cards, then he'd probably loose it too. Maybe Exp was bluffing and the bomb did nothing, or maybe they were saving it for a special occasion, but he expected a bomb would have already done its damage in the hands of a traitor.

(I am so confused by this xD I'm pretty sure Joe used bomb as in vote - but reading bomb as vote here  - I cannot understand it :P. 

7 hours ago, Mark IV said:

It would be fairly suspicious to cast a vote in the sheet and not announce anything about it in the thread - anyone caught doing this would definitely get flak for it, probably being killed for being a turncoat as well (barring post limit shenanigans, of course). I don't think it's really alignment indicative that Suspicious explicitly voted. I expect he'd do the same regardless of whether he were gang or turncoat.

(Ah, let me elaborate further. It is normal/NAI for someone to post suspicion on someone and vote in the sheet for the same person. Agreed that anyone doing otherwise would be immediately suspected. My point is that Joe chose to post his suspicion in red/bold as against, in direct contrast, Pol stated their suspicion and voted in sheet but did no highlight the suspicion with red/bold. Eh sure, it's likely NAI anyway, but I want to assign a small village lean towards it nonetheless.)

12 minutes ago, KelsierApologist said:

We can vote multiple times, right?

(Hmm, yeah we can but only our last vote is counted. It's just like a normal game - except we are voting in the sheet. So looking at the sheet, you're actually only voting for Lord Spirit because that is your latest vote. Similarly, I reckon Joe made a list of players he suspected (the 3 names in red) and voted for the one he suspected the most. We cannot vote for more than one player at the same time.)

Posted
19 hours ago, KelsierApologist said:

he pointed them at Exp, and said, “We trust the cards. Let’s feed him to the wolves.”

Billy Joe eyed Exp, popping a tater tot into his mouth and chewing thoughtfully. "Sorry mate, but if we don't have a better lead to go on, I'm inclined to trust the cards for now." 

 

14 hours ago, TwinStorm said:

"I don't know, you don't know, we don't know!" the Crazed cackled, faking insanity for the fun of it. "It's all random, so random murder ought to solve it!" he said, pointing at #1 Taln Fan. "It's nothing personal." he staged-whispered. "Just good business."

"Really, Crazed? If you're gonna pick someone random, you could at least not pick the fella what feeds 'ya every night. Downright rude, that is." 

----------
Sorry, had a bit of a hectic day yesterday with exams, I'm too late to vote for day 1, correct? 

Posted
1 minute ago, #1 Taln Fan said:

Billy Joe eyed Exp, popping a tater tot into his mouth and chewing thoughtfully. "Sorry mate, but if we don't have a better lead to go on, I'm inclined to trust the cards for now." 

 

"Really, Crazed? If you're gonna pick someone random, you could at least not pick the fella what feeds 'ya every night. Downright rude, that is." 

----------
Sorry, had a bit of a hectic day yesterday with exams, I'm too late to vote for day 1, correct? 

"Fair. Sorry 'bout that. Didn't mean it. Twas random."

Posted
2 minutes ago, #1 Taln Fan said:

Billy Joe eyed Exp, popping a tater tot into his mouth and chewing thoughtfully. "Sorry mate, but if we don't have a better lead to go on, I'm inclined to trust the cards for now." 

 

"Really, Crazed? If you're gonna pick someone random, you could at least not pick the fella what feeds 'ya every night. Downright rude, that is." 

----------
Sorry, had a bit of a hectic day yesterday with exams, I'm too late to vote for day 1, correct? 

You are not! You still have two and a bit hours!

Posted
1 hour ago, |TJ| said:

We cannot vote for more than one player at the same time.)

I’m wrong then, sorry. Switched to exp.

 

1 hour ago, |TJ| said:

Pol stated their suspicion and voted in sheet but did no highlight the suspicion with red/bold.

I went back and highlighted to make it a bit more clear lol

Posted
57 minutes ago, |TJ| said:

My point is that Joe chose to post his suspicion in red/bold as against, in direct contrast, Pol stated their suspicion and voted in sheet but did no highlight the suspicion with red/bold. Eh sure, it's likely NAI anyway, but I want to assign a small village lean towards it nonetheless.)

Eh, as an elim, honestly a visible D1 vote and possibly directing D1 discussion is definitely something worth risking higher visibility for. Especially if it's D1, where elim!Joe could easily just pretend they had no idea Exp was innocent - we're all shooting in the dark anyway. I agree it would be alignment indicative in certain circumstances (especially mid and late game), but personally, I would mostly discount this specific instant. But, of course, that's just my judgement/opinion 🤷‍♂️. I understand where you're coming from too.

------------

A couple of GM questions, @The Unknown Flame:

  • What happens in case of a tie? I skimmed the rules but couldn't see any mention of it. (Possible I missed it)
  • How does one retract a vote and vote for no one? I don't see a null option in the spreadsheet

Also, why is everyone using red for every suspicion? It kinda makes it confusing who you're actually voting for 😅

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Mark IV said:

What happens in case of a tie? I skimmed the rules but couldn't see any mention of it. (Possible I missed it

Random chance because I never clarified.

25 minutes ago, Mark IV said:

How does one retract a vote and vote for no one? I don't see a null option in the spreadsheet

I'll see if I can add a null option, if not I'll talk to Kas. He was the one that prettied up the spreadsheet. 

Edit: I'll ask Kas, in the meantime if you want to, you can clear out all of your previous votes and temporarily break causality. 

Edit Dois: Kas is on it!

25 minutes ago, Mark IV said:

Also, why is everyone using red for every suspicion? It kinda makes it confusing who you're actually voting for 😅

Because they're weird, and this is the only game they won't get yelled at by the GM for it.

Edited by The Unknown Flame
Posted

First off, @Mark IV, the Bomb that Exp has is referring entirely to his Role Playing. None of my analysis last night was based off of Alignment Indicative Activity, it was all based on Role Play, in order to get things going. And look! Now people have discussed things!

So, here is my actual analysis, based more on how the votes have gone.

First off, Experience, I don't really think you're a Turncoat at this point. You had two votes right off the bat, but no one ever really defended you. A few other people collected 2 votes, but none of them feel like they are meant to protect you. This could be explained by your fellow Turncoats being spread out or not yet having voted, so I don't actually trust you any more than random chance. So it's not worth it to vote for you, even to save my own life. But if I live, i will revisit you in more detail.

I'm a tiny bit more suspicious of KelsierApologist, but still not enough to vote for her, because there are others who are a little more suspicious.

|TJ| was the first player to vote based on actual feelings/suspicions, rather than RP or Random poking, and it was for KelsierApologist. This is the first person that could be construed as voting in defense of another player, that being Experience.

TJ's vote was followed by Mark IV voting for a Confirmed Villager, so obviously he's a turncoat. (Just kidding) But Mark also votes based on actual posts, rather than RP/Random, becoming the second player to do so, and he also votes on a player that voted for the current Train at the time. It's just weird to me that TJ and Mark both voted for the players participating in a pseudo-train, without actually mentioning that fact. Wasit not at all part of their feelings, or was is deliberately not mentioned because they assumed that Exp would come online and counter vote to save his own skin, thus making Exp look suspicious while not attracting any attention to TJ and Mark?

Lord Spirit chose to vote on TheRavenHasLanded, who already had a vote, and has not posted. This, once again, feels like a strange defense or vote spreading method that a Turncoat might use.

#1 Taln Fan has also added a vote to Exp, bringing them back up to 2 votes, and making it even more confusing as to Exp's alignment. It would probably be a good idea to Execute Exp at this point just for the wealth of Information we'd get, but I don't suspect Exp enough to do that. No real Suspicion of Taln either.

Finally, Nemora's Enchanted Easel has nor done anything at all that is alignment Indicative to me. Fae would vote me, and potentially accidentally execute me, entirely for the giggles on Day 1 regardless of faer alignment. Fae would certainly prefer I remain alive so that fae can mess with me for longer than that, but faer behavior here is what i would expect regardless of alignment.

So, i'm voting for TJ, Lord Spirit, and Mark this turn as the three I am actually semi suspicious of based on activity instead of Role Play. I will leave my vote on TJ, as the one I am most suspicious of.

Annoyingly, none of them currently have a vote on them, so this might get me executed due to the current vote count. Ah well.

"A Joe in the Bush (2): Mark IV, Nemoras Enchanted Easel
TheRavenHasLanded (2): Ashbringer, Lord Spirit
#1 Taln Fan (1): Twinstorm
|TJ| (1): A Joe in the Bush
Experience (1): KelsierApologist
KelsierApologist  (1): |TJ|

 

Posted

Eep didn't realize the game started today lmao

Twinstorm I'm voting for you since you're voting for our new friend Taln fan. I may be slightly biased but I'd like him to stick around if possible lmao

Posted
1 hour ago, Mark IV said:

Currently It's @Experience, @TheRavenHasLanded and @A Joe in the Bush who are in a 3 way tie for the vote at 2 counts each. I'm not entirely sure why Raven has 2 votes. But at least it'll be fun to see what happens next.

Why do you think Exp had 2 votes? He's shown activity but only in a single RP-rebuttal post, is that much more significant than Raven not being here at all?

Hmm. Don't like that too much, but I'd also rather not move off a poked player who didn't respond.

And someone has posted in a "1+ new reply, Go to first new post... let's see if I must return.

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, A Joe in the Bush said:

It's just weird to me that TJ and Mark both voted for the players participating in a pseudo-train, without actually mentioning that fact. Wasit not at all part of their feelings, or was is deliberately not mentioned because they assumed that Exp would come online and counter vote to save his own skin, thus making Exp look suspicious while not attracting any attention to TJ and Mark?

(Bold mine. Sorry, what fact are you referring to here? Is it that I was voting on a pseudo-(side?)train. Tbh, I did not (and still don't) have an opinion on Exp. At the time I made the post, I had a slight negative read on Pol and slight positive read on you, everyone else to be figured out. Exp's post and the two votes on him did not give me any indication of the alignment of Exp or their voters.)

Edit? - (Hopefully this merges but Steel gut-village from that post) 

Posted (edited)

🎵

Every solver knows

The secret to surviving 

Is knowing what to throw away

And knowing what to keep

🎵

Cause every distroes a winner

And every distroes a loser,

And the best the Village can hope for

Is to die at lylo

🎵

-from the creative genius that is the dead doc

~

Welcome to QF74 Cycle Two - the Secret to Survival!

Mark IV has been killed! He was a Bandit!

A Joe in the Bush has been executed! He was a Bandit!

Votecount:

A Joe in the Bush (2): Mark IV, Nemoras Enchanted Easel

TheRavenHasLanded (2): Ashbringer, Lord Spirit

#1 Taln Fan (1): Twinstorm

|TJ| (1): A Joe in the Bush

Experience (1): KelsierApologist 

KelsierApologist (1): |TJ|

Twinstorm (1): Steeldancer

You can vote here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q9v6dRjeQQOR9nkhPwjhXR7pUjDDyOYMZ-NM2toAAXk/edit?usp=drivesdk

Please place your first vote in the Vote One section, your second in the Vote Two section, and so on. Please also send in a vote to your GMPM each time you do so. Tampering with the votes of anyone else is strictly prohibited. Make certain you place your votes in the Cycle Two page. It is now the first page in the sheet.

Things to Remember:

  • You may only post 8 times in this thread! 
  • No breaking the laws of causality by conversing within edits
  • This cycle will end tomorrow the 12th of March at 12:30 Central Time. 
  • Have fun!

Player list

Spoiler
  • @A Joe in the Bush as The Suspicious Man, who's a Turncoat, just not that kind Bandit
  • @Nemoras Enchanted Easel as The Nameless Whisperer, who gave the snitches their stitches 
  • @KelsierApologist as The Enforcer, who you definitely don't want to mess with
  • @TwinStorm as The Crazed, a jester without a court
  • @TheRavenHasLanded as Twice Fooled, Once Crazy, who really needs to learn that he can close his eyes
  • @Lord Spirit as Johnny Goodman, who is making this gang a walking Spiderman meme
  • @#1 Taln Fan as Billy Joe, who eats almost as much as me
  • @Steeldancer as nobody, nobody worth your notice that is
  • @|TJ| as a worrywart, who worries about things that I, in my infinite wisdom, have already though about
  • @Ashbringer as Human, who, despite the blue skin and abnormal size, is Very Human
  • @Mark IV as Lamron, who is going to explode when he tries to escape the Bendalloy bubble  Bandit

 

Edited by The Unknown Flame
Posted

The Crazed grimaced. Two dead. How had nobody seen who killed Mark? There were all still in the bendalloy bubble, after all. "Well, no leads for us, yet, so must be random." he sighed, doing a handspring, very early knocking people out of the bubble. He balanced on his head. "How 'bout that human fellow over there?" he said, pointing at Human.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...