Negative_Null

I'll be honest, I've been out of it today and haven't been able to pay attention. I'll put mine on Lord Spirit cause he doesn't have any at the moment. Hopefully I'll be back on it tomorrow, sorry

Dang, I got here just after the roll over. yeah this is crazy The question is did the elim team misplay? Or do we need to start looking harder at BigBad? I don't remember them doing much in the last two cycles

I hear you saying this for both Striker and Aster, which is why I'm not hitting them too hard. I'll still put a vote there because I don't have many better ideas at the moment, but I'm far from tunneling there. Just need more leads. I see the logic behind allowing for ties, but just for consistency/devil's advocate sakes, I'll continue to argue against it. Let's get some factioning up in here, makes things easier. Got it! Thank you. Yeah, I originally voted Kelsier Apologist because I lost track of K names, then thought it was Kasimir I meant, then realized you were just furthering Striker's original argument. So I hope that wasn't too confusing. Just for clarity's sake: Striker I get the feeling that Kas and TJ are V, either that or one or probably both is playing total 5d chess with us, which isn't impossible. Irl I would put them as high village vibes but here where you actually can pm and plan, that reduces the likelihood a bit. Just my take. Both play a lot like my friend who always argues for optimal plays no matter which side he's on

In response to all the questions about me, I haven't done SE before but I've played a lot of these social deduction games irl. I'm definitely seeing that it's a pretty different skill set but whatever, it works. Reading through, I do think that we are defaulting to not considering people who are less active atm, which is probably a good idea, but still worth considering. Irl targeting quiet people is good but here, could be due to any number of factors, as could people being significantly more active. I don't think we should tie. Advocating for ties seems really sus to me. Even if we get more info that way, we're still shortening the time that the elims need. We can also get info out of what they do at night without killing two or three people. I'm aware I kind of just said a lot of words without actually talking a stance on much so uh, Striker for the moment

Well yes but I didn't vote for myself last time and I didn't see anyone else doing it. Oh well, Jo will figure it out in the end. Yes, that does make it a little bit confusing to plan out who to vote for, but thanks for pointing it out. I still think that making sure we don't have a tie in second place should be a high priority, so I'll save my vote on myself until tomorrow morning (for me)

Wait when did I get votes? Did I miss something? I would cautiously venture a Striker proposal, not seriously, just saying that imo, people that take this much of a leadership role are often elims. Granted, my meta could be different, and y'all might have a better idea. But putting it out for discussion. As far as I'm aware, I don't see any reason to dogpile on TOW except for the vote erasure, which who knows what that means. With so many votes on TJ I'm thinking about putting a vote on someone else for later, or in case the Elims do something wack again. If we have this many people tied for Two votes at the end of the cycle, that would be bad

I'd be willing to assume that E!TJ, or that the Elims are trying to throw us off. Could go either way. It definitely was a move though

Aaaaand we have a tie again. Dang it. Maybe we'll get lucky and get two elims. i thought about changing my vote to TJ but I was too slow

Well I'm glad I didn't end up making a tie.

I'm sure they meant longitude

Aw... thanks? Unless you're secretly an Elim trying to ingratiate yourself with the noobs That's also a good point, that we can see who will be saved by the Elims. Regardless, after checking the spreadsheet, I'll keep my vote for Unknown. Sorry, Spren but I can't do anything for you

Ah, that's not good. So we are forced to kill at least one person a round, then. Maybe I'll change my vote then so we don't have a tie.

I was big into roleplay like, 3-4 years ago. Haven't changed my name or profile picture since. If you were part of like, The Fellowship of the Thing era we definitely saw each other

Ciris walked out of the laboratory where they had been working (definitely not sleeping.) The ardent noticed that they seemed to be late for some kind of meeting, what was going on again? They rifled through their memory, thinking... Oh yeah, there was a mystery! The group seemed to be discussing philosophy rather than the mystery though, and even though Ciris was an ardent, they weren't that kind of ardent and they were lost pretty quickly. They raised their hand and said quietly, "I know I'm late, but I think that we should avoid eliminating someone if we can, but it seems TJ already has a lot of votes and I can't change that. I'll vote for The Unknown Order, since he seems to be experienced in this kind of espionage, and to maybe force a tie, since I think that's good for the defenders" (OOC: I usually play pacifist for the first round because I feel it allows for the villagers to get their feet under them and feel out the factions. I mostly understand the custom rules here but I think we'll all see soon how that will impact the game)