-
Posts
6744 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by NameIess
-
If you go into your account settings and look under the display name tab, it should tell you how many you have left. I think you have one left, since you changed your name on the 17th.
-
But the mass is different. The objects assume that their other half has the same mass as they do. They don't transfer only the force required to move the other gemstone the same amount as they do, they transfer enough force that the other gemstone would move the same distance if it was the same size. Aside from that, what do you assume happens when you move the smaller gemstone? The larger gemstone would move more slowly, right? With force multiplication, why would that occur? Is there force division? is force conserved? if force is conserved, then why would is it conserved one way, but not the other?
-
The Longest Thread (Misadventures)
NameIess replied to ElephantEarwax's topic in Forum Games & Random Stuff
It tasted like a whisk with an e. In other words, it was absolutely delicious.- 111877 replies
-
- longest thread
- butt venture
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Oathgate question and possible retcon
NameIess replied to Awaken Returner's topic in Stormlight Archive
Actually, the oathgate on Urithiru wasn't sealed. Shallan merely rotated the oathgate control building, causing the doorway to open into an area that was still covered in crem. The control buildings on Urithiru had much less crem on them, due to the hightsorms rarely reaching the tower. -
Same here. It looks awesome.
-
I don't think that is the idea, actually. I think the idea is to add "gears" to conjoined fabrial creations. Since no force is created out of thin air, moving the fourth bridge would take basically the same amount of force to move the same speed. While they could decrease the area of the gemstones being pulled, it wouldn't be a huge advantadge if they continued to use chulls. However, they won't continue to use chulls. They will use gravity, like with Kaladin's glove. Only, instead of the maximum acceleration being limited to the acceleration of gravity, and the mininum acceleration being controlled by slowing the fall of the gemstones, the maximum speed will be capped by the size of the gemstones they can find, and the minimum speed will be controlled by having smaller gemstones falling. That makes than conjoined fabrials somehow switching from movement conservation across distances to stormlight to kinetic energy converters. We already have lashings for that.
-
Not much of one, because they are using chulls to pull the gemstones. The chulls would be forced to pull more slowly, leading to about the same result. Although they could add more chulls. If you exert force on a small gemstone (5g), half of that force is put onto the big gemstone (40g). Because your force is being halved, you have to exert enough force to move 10g in order to move the small gemstone. Likewise, if you exert force on the 40g gemstone, half of that energy is given to the other gemstone, meaning that in order to move the big gemstone, you must exert enough force to move 80g. Here is what appears to be the conjoined fabrial equation: force exerted/2 = force on gemstone. Each gemstone gets half of the force you put on one of the gemstones. Normally, the gemstones are almost exactly the same mass, so they move almost exactly the same amount, but with larger gemstones and smaller gemstones, the smaller gemstone will move more than the larger gemstone, because it takes more force to move the larger gemstone.
-
Did the Highstorm and Everstorm ever clash again?
NameIess replied to Nesh's topic in Stormlight Archive
Nah. I'd bet good money that the storms will clash sometime in KoW. -
If the mass is different, the same amount of force will result in different speeds. If a gemstone is accelerating at 9.8m/sec^2, as by earth gravity, and is joined to a gemstone that is half the size, the smaller gemstone will accelerate twice as fast, at 19.6m/sec^2. No, because energy and speed are completely different. If two conjoined gemstones of the same size have a mass 5 grams each, then lifting the one of them would feel like lifting a mass of 10 grams. If two conjoined gemstones are different masses, for example if one was 10 grams and the other 30 grams, then you would expect lifting one of them to feel like lifting 40 grams. However, if you life the gem that weighs 30 grams, it will feel like 60 grams. Likewise, if you lift the one that feels like 10 grams, it will feel like lifting 20 grams. Basically, if you put X force into one of the gemstones, it send X/2 force to the other one, and because of the size difference, that force results in the smaller gemstone moving much more than the larger one.
-
Jasnah being brilliant in WoK [spoilers] [discuss]
NameIess replied to Arod's topic in Stormlight Archive
Looks like we have confirmation that drawing stormlight out of a gemstone too quickly will break it: -
The speed can be multiplied. For example, Navani could make the glove thing that Kaladin used fly at more than the speed of gravity. Force is not magnified. That goes against basic conjoined fabrial mechanics. Right after inventing it, Raboniel mentions force multiplication, but Navani says that energy will likely be conserved.
-
I'm pretty sure it doesn't work like that. The gemstones impart an equal force on each other. The size difference leads to different speeds, as it takes a larger amount of energy to move a larger gemstone at a certain velocity. Force = Mass * Acceleration. say gemstone A is imparted with 15 newtons of force, and has a mass of 5 kg, meaning it accelerates at 3 meters per second. 15N = 5kg * 3meters/second^2. The smaller gemstone then has 15 Newtons of energy imparted to it, and it has a mass of 1 kg. The equation then comes out to 15N = 1kg * 15meters/second^2. 5 times the speed, but the same amount of force.
- 160 replies
-
12
-
The Longest Thread (Misadventures)
NameIess replied to ElephantEarwax's topic in Forum Games & Random Stuff
Uncle Brand loved his whiske.- 111877 replies
-
- longest thread
- butt venture
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
The Longest Thread (Misadventures)
NameIess replied to ElephantEarwax's topic in Forum Games & Random Stuff
Uncle Brandy pulled out his choclate-covered-peanut-butt-pretzal-that-tastes-like-strawberries-inator. "You read my mind!"- 111877 replies
-
- longest thread
- butt venture
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I think that we can safely sat that Larkins cannot eat a shardblade, considering that no spren have ever completely died pre-RoW. Larkins might be able to feed off of spren, but they are almost certainly unable to completely kill them.
-
Nightwatcher Boon/Bane (Game)
NameIess replied to killersquirrel59's topic in Forum Games & Random Stuff
Granted. I do an excellent job of writing your research paper. What was the topic again? Doesn't matter, I'm not giving it to you anyways. I wish that my research paper will get a good grade. -
The Longest Thread (Misadventures)
NameIess replied to ElephantEarwax's topic in Forum Games & Random Stuff
Nameless' inquisitors emerged from the smoke unharmed. They raised power-wrought axes and grinned evilly.- 111877 replies
-
- longest thread
- butt venture
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Boys. Not ONLY boys, but... Boys.
NameIess replied to Channelknight Fadran's topic in Social Groups, Clans, & Guilds
The lowest temperatures we get where I live are in the teens, and that’s pretty rare. that said, I do know about that, but only because I have a cold right now. -
Boys. Not ONLY boys, but... Boys.
NameIess replied to Channelknight Fadran's topic in Social Groups, Clans, & Guilds
Nice. Around where I live, we've been getting temperatures in the 40's. -
The Longest Thread (Misadventures)
NameIess replied to ElephantEarwax's topic in Forum Games & Random Stuff
Nameless dunked the toothpick into a vat of liquid Atium, then swallowed it whole.- 111877 replies
-
- longest thread
- butt venture
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
