Jump to content

CadCom

Members
  • Posts

    1051
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by CadCom

  1. Oh this is awkward. I was off by an hour...
  2. In the interest of helping to ensure vote manipulation is not able to affect the results, Kidpen Aeternum Because no one else is doing it.
  3. Ok that's weird to me. Kidpen voted me, aet followed shortly and voted kidpen. Then kidpen removed their vote, and aet followed shortly after again removing the vote from Kidpen. Aet, are we on a team now? Should I send you my faction doc link Looks like you're trying to protect me. Though I do appreciate the generous and unrequited protection
  4. Wow, there's only like 5 hours 4 hours left, and no votes have been cast yet. Wow it only took me an hour to write a single sentence. Busy at work. I'm off now though, Primarily to generate discussion, but I'm going to start my vote this cycle on Kidpen, Just as a continuation of my "Backstabbing" vote from last cycle. (Though I'm taking the backstabbing in a different direction.) In other words No one has directly asked me to backstab this person. Though to be perfectly clear, this is mostly to begin generating discussion, and I hope that my vote isn't the only vote placed by the end of the cycle. I'll be checking periodically the rest of the evening to hopefully keep involved in the discussions.
  5. LTiNRAOWDGBPAHHiMMARMIMROFI/KAM I feel like there was a code in this, and it was more than just having a petty response to this
  6. Ok quick vote count: TUO (1): Aeternum Sart (1): CadCom (me) RBM (3): Mat, Kas, TUA. So currently RBM is going to be marked. This seems like it wouldn't be a teammate tagging their teammate, but only because it would be too obvious. But that also means it could be. Classic IKYK (I think I'm using that right) --- I'll try to add more thoughts later. I'm doing several projects simultaneously irl, so its a busy weekend for me.
  7. Pretty simple. They asked if I had people lining up for me to backstab them. I told them they were the first,and asked how they wanted me to backstab them. That's what they said to do. I got to choose voting or action. I thought it would be fun to do a vote
  8. Sorry about the double post, but it's been several hours, and it's different enough material I feel I warrant a double post. But, I was reached out to In PM, responding to my offer to backstab. Said person said I could backstab them by putting a mark on their teammate, who they claimed to be Sart. So sorry Sart, but either your teammate or someone pretending to be your teammate wants you to get a mark.
  9. Richard walked into the room where everyone else was hanging out. It was a fairly. He needed to come up with a good Epic name, as everyone else seemed to go by theirs, and Richard had never chosen one or been given one. (I don't know this universe) Good thing everyone had nametags. hmmm. Richard Thought. I see Arsonist, Dwarf and Welder. Those are good names. But I think they also seem too plain for my style. Let's see. Fish, disperse. Those names are too meta for me. Aah... I see electro and Helios. That's more what I'm looking for. Kind of elegant but still related to my ability. Now to choose. Nublos? No too mystical. Anapnoi? No too mythical. Aliento? No...Alient? Yeah, that fits me. Now to introduce myself. Across the room, sat two unknown people he had not yet read the names of. One held a glass of water. Ahh perfect, I'll just wait for him to set it down, and send over a small short, quick breath. As the unknown person sat the glass down, it was just out of line of sight. No worries. Alient let out a quick burst of air. Right at the last second the air turned just a bit, knocking over the glass, spilling water all over the person who had just set it down. The timing was impeccaable. It appeared as if he had just clumsily set it down, and allowed it to spill. While one man sat there stunned, and now sopping wet, the other began laughing uncontrollably. ----- Hi guys, I'm here. Just rereading the rules, it seems fairly straightforward. I was going to poke vote, but it appears I'm last to comment. If I wasn't last, I apologize to you unknown person who I glanced over. With PMs open, instead of closed, that makes it so that there will be much more coordination across factions, and also much more backstabbing across factions. If you want to be backstabbed, feel free to PM me Just kidding, I'm very nice.
  10. I'll sign up Edit: reading the rules, I can sign up with a name(no idea if it would be an epic name), but I haven't read the books this is based off of, so I don't know what the power portfolio should even look like or what weaknesses would look like in this world. But I'll sign up as Richard Johnson for now. (I'll try to figure out the rest later)
  11. I enjoyed the game while I lasted! After revealing my action on N1 I wish I would have kept it quiet for longer, to allow for me to try to figure out even more. But I'm also not upset that I revealed when I did.
  12. Was looking for one with several factions, each trying to be the last faction. Like houses. I remember one from several years ago where people were in a Mistborn House competing against other houses. Just can't find it. I'll look over the one you sent me though.
  13. Can someone point me to a previous faction game? I'm making adjustments to one of my rulesets, and would love to review other faction game rulesets.
  14. @Kasimir Yeah, Let's go ahead and activate me again. Unless the cycle has changed, do we still have an MR and another LG infront of the next QF? I just can't do anything starting next week, or the week of July 7th
  15. How long is the line on QFs? I had one that I never ran before going inactive(I think i was getting close to the front of the line), that would be a "One-Night" adaptation(If you've ever played that party game) If the line isn't super long, I'd love to try running it before school starts up again. (After that, I'd have way too much going on for at least that semester, quite possibly beyond)
  16. Alright so, if out of 9, there's most likely 7 good guys. Out of 8 remaining, there's six. This analysis relies heavily on other peoples analysis, and not my own for initial claims, after that I will build on it, but feel free to questions everything Cadcom, Kas, and RBM have claimed specific good guy roles or actions or been tentatively cleared as such. RBM needs another Aes Sedai with them, who they already know. This means a possibility of a 4th. Can the Amerlyn have a warder? I imagine they could. That could be RBM's Aes Sedai. If not, then it is either me, or a 4th. (I'm not claiming my role) That leaves Aeo, Aet, Stick, mat, Araris. (One of which could be RBM's aes sedai) Most likely two of which are bad guys. I don't have time now, but hopefully tonight, or if not, tomorrow (if I survive) I'll Do a big in-depth analysis of these 5. Sorry if some of you had already reached this conclusion and I'm not adding much for you. This was mostly for me to process what I know.
  17. So first off, I am glad that my claim has been able to generate a decent amount of discussion. Part of me wished I had held off on releasing the information, to see if I could have gotten more information from that initial claim From what I remember, it is very hard to consistently use play style as an indication of alignment, and I haven't played with any of you for so long, so I don't know where I would even start with that. So instead I'm going to rely on my wit and ability to decipher claims and information. I'm trying to remember all claims that have been publicly made so far. I remember mine, and the one I kindof accidentally publised about Kas. Mat claimed LoL Day 1, but qualified that with a JK, so probably not serious Theres chatter that royalbee claimed warder? Is that right? I must've missed that claim. Any other public claims that I missed? My kid just walked away with my phone to use it's flashlight, which had my rule doc on it, so I'm going to cut my analysis off there for now. When I either regain possession of my phone or bother to open up a new tab, I might come back.
  18. If I could PM you, I could, but I don't think anyone can PM, (My fault) I ask, because I blocked all water actions. The amerlyn seat is the only role that could have vote jacked. To me this means we either don't have a forsaken, or someone that didn't vote is a forsaken. (Aet) It also means anyone who has a protect action available, should probably put it towards Kas, assuming their vote jack was actually successful.
  19. @Kasimir Are you claiming to be amerlyn seat or claiming to have used compulsion? I see evidence of a single vote manip, which you've claimed. Where are you getting that aet was also possibly vote jacked? Edit: And to clarify, there's not a vote tonight, right? Those were just people throwing out votes before realizing it was a night cycle?
  20. Alright it's been 4 years, and there's some new lingo. Is misexe a missed execution? Meaning ng executing a villager? That's the only question I remember at the moment. I'm not gonna ng to quote people bc on mobile again, but I did a deeper re reading of everyone's posts, and want to respond to a few things. @stick. If people vote me, I'm fine with that. I'm not brand new, and I have thick skin, so I know it's nothing personal. @araris, I see I missed some things in your questioning of me. So the reason I failed to mention the amerlyn as being a potential missing role is simply because I missed it in the rules. Upon further player studying I have decided that it's possible either Lord of luck or Lord of 2 rivers is missing, and then one of the warder/blademaster plain roles is missing. I still think amerlyn is likely to be included though I could be wrong as it's just my intuition. @mat, you asked why I voted kasimir instead of just not voting. This is per what araris said in his first post, where he voted for me. He also mentioned we should have everyone vote to force elims to use compulsion. I still don't fully understand the reasoning maybe @Araris Valerian(that tag worked)can further explain, but it seemed reasonable. But I wanted to vote for someone who hadn't had votes for them yet. ----- Now I know I'm at a disadvantage because I haven't played at all with many of you and others were years ago. But I personally didn't like how mat jumped right in to protect me (softly) read like an elim trying to buddy up to a villager to me, so on that note, as mat still has no votes Kasimir, Mat. Edit: typed that half hour ago. Forgot to submit
  21. On mobile so forgive formatting. It looks like we're at one vote so far for stick, weirdo, CadCom, araris, and aeoryi. I think it's best to try to not ex someone with such a small number of people on day 1. Keeping no more than one vote per person will also require the elims to manipulate the vote to get a vote kill tonight. I'll put a vote on Kasimir for now, in my effort to prevent a build up on anyone.
  22. Understood. What I mean is that with only 9 players, but 11 listed roles, we don't have all roles. Because certain roles appear as warders and blademasters with a scan already. On compulsion, it says change a players vote to whatever you wish. Is this supposed to say to whoever you wish? If can they change a vote to an action? Is compulsion the only vote manipulation action or ability? I didn't see any other in my 30 second skim just barely.
  23. Haha I think we'll get it as we go along. Mechanically, I don't think we have any plain warders or blademasters. Because there's only 9 people, and some rolls appear as that to a role scan by the keeper. Though I suppose it is possible that one of the Lord characters is not in the game. I also expect that we'll probably have 2 elims. I don't remember for certain, but I think 4 years ago that we liked to have 20-25% be elims. 2 would be 22ish percent. ----- I would role play but I don't have energy at the moment. Perhaps later today or tomorrow.
  24. I'm in, as CadCom, a farmer who mysteriously left his farm 4 years ago,, and finally decided to return, much to the surprise and concern of neighbors, who have no idea where he's been for the last 4 years.
  25. Uh... Hi. I thought the cycle was moved to close at 6:00 PM, not 6:00 AM, so I'm fairly surprised to see we're on a new cycle. I don't really know how to prove my innocence, but I don't have an Aviar, so I haven't been able to submit any actions. I haven't had any private conversations. I'm just kinda floating in the game right now. Also, yes, I did move my vote from Straw to mint. In the 4-2 situation, where we lynch a trapper, don't we lose? once it's even numbers, isn't it game over? Or am I misunderstanding the rules. So let's see, we've got @Ashbringer, @Kings_way, @Gears, @The Windrunner Supreme, @Frozen Mint, and @CadCom still alive, according to the list above. Of these people, I would say Gears is most active, followed by either me or Ash, then windrunner, and with Kings_way and Mint being least active. would we all agree with that order or activity? From my perspective, if we assume one active elim, and one inactive elim, I agree it's better to get rid of the active eliminator first. (I know, it's opposite my stance from last cycle, but the situation has changed, now we're essentially at lylo, and last cycle we weren't) Assuming one active elim, (which I believe to be the most likely), I would say it is among Gears, Ashbringer, and Windrunner. I'm not entirely certain about gears, because I've been reading you as neutral all game, which is a dangerous read. Ive been reading ashbringer and windrunner as mild elim to mild village, kindof on an oscillating cycle. (when I read one one way, I read the other the other) But right now, I'm following my gut, and I'm gonna start the votes on Windrunner. This may change if I have time while at work to review their posts, and look into gear's posts as well.
×
×
  • Create New...