Jump to content

Kidpen

Members
  • Posts

    3488
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Kidpen

  1. "their elimination no longer counts towards win con" was the particular phrasing. I didn't mean it as a serious possibility.
  2. Wouldn't this imply that we lose automatically if the first vote is a Heretic? Since they are dead, I definitely think the last two would be considered "the last two" and become lovers. I feel okay about Cash's explanation. Cash67. Wierdo. Edit: Current tally btw. Vote Tally Cash67 (2): TheRavenHasLanded, Wierdo TheRavenHasLanded (2): Archer, RoyalBeeMage Wierdo (2): Cash67, Kidpen Eternum (1): Spark of Hope Kidpen (1): Weaver of Lies Archer (1): Kasimir Aeoryi (1): Aeternum
  3. No, I'm not assuming anything in particular. I'd like Cash to explain why they said that without saying it was an assumption or anything else. It feels opportunistic. I am generally suspicious of votes that quickly hop on with others, especially if they make that person the current majority vote and especially if it has fairly little justification. Is Wierdo fairly new btw? Obviously I haven't been around in a long time so there are lots of "new" faces I wouldn't recognize. That's alright. Consider sharing some thoughts on the discussion that is going on. Archer has a lot of interaction going on with a lot of people, maybe you should start talking to them and split their attention even more Edit: ... well thats new. Is there a way to disable the thread summary on the right?
  4. I feel suspicious of this. If Cash responds I think Wierdo may be my next vote.
  5. Because villagers dying helps the elims win, and elims dying helps the villagers win. So in terms of direct affect, me dying hurts my (and the villager's) wincon, even if there are some positive affects for a villager dying as well. Weaver of Lies. Any thoughts on the game so far? I said that in part to say that this would be an acceptable outcome, although I'd prefer someone else. Really the only way for this vote to go fully bad would be if we got the high priest. I also just saw Kas's question about why Cash assumed we have 3 elims. I think its a very good question, and I did not see a response. For now I'll hop on Cash67.
  6. Oh, I completely missed the Lover rule. It depends on this rule clarification then, but I'd imagine they still become lovers if one is Returned If I Return everyone knows I'm a Priest. If one were to assume I am not a High Priest, the only affect to me is that I can't vote, and I'd say sharing my reads without suspicion allows me a degree of influence that somewhat outweighs that.
  7. Wdym? We have to identify all the heretics regardless, since our win condition is eliminating them.
  8. NOOOOOOO Oh, I'm a bit late to the party. I should be around until the cycle end though. Although actually-do we want a Heretic or a Priest to die today? I'm thinking a Heretic would be ideal, but there is some benefit to a Priest dying as well. So if I were to die it would be an okay situation for me, other than the whole win condition situation. @Weaver of Lies Weaver of Lies seems to be a sensible next target.
  9. Tethan was shocked when he heard the news. A god, dead by the hands of her priests-and not just any god, his old god. This might just be enough to bring him out of his very longstanding retirement.... Hello! I have been craving murder and lies lately. I'm in
  10. Do you mean like the bit where Kaladin is called out for homophobia or something else?
  11. Gonna be honest I don't know why I answered the poll. One vote for "I'd be fine with this happening" can be disregarded.
  12. The heck? It was still 200 away like 10 minutes ago. Oh well. Pretty cool!
  13. As someone who hasn't read any of this thread except for this post, the main problem is that your definition of determinism doesn't seem to be the standard. Even if some events are determined by random chance, that still isn't your choice, right? I've never seen anyone say that determinism is when you can predict all of your choices before you make them. Like, fundamentally the two options are 1. The universe is set in stone from the beginning and none of our decisions could have ever been any different. Or 2. Some of the decisions we make are decided entirely by random chance. It seems to me that both of these fall under the label of determinism. I considered myself a compatiblist until recently, but now I'm mostly just not completely sure. Edit: Hmm. Guess I'm just repeating almost the same thing as my post earlier in this thread. Oh well,
  14. Oh, hey this happened I guess. Congrats Ene!
  15. Gonna unfollow this. I'll finally be free.
  16. My main thought is that maybe you could just use the scroll wheel to choose metals?
  17. This is a really cool project! I'm curious, are you planning to put this on itch.io or gamejolt or any other such game sharing website? Or just keep it as a download on here? Both are cool, mostly just wondering!
  18. Huh. Alright then. Slightly worried about this but I mean I appreciate that people are actually voting now.
  19. Posting again cause this has a vote. I'm not in love with these lynch options, but I'm even less in love with every other lynch option. Between the two of them, I think Mist is the better option. Plus I feel very strongly about preventing vote manip.
  20. I don't like this situation. Give me a minute to look at some of mist and walins post. I know I haven't been active but everyone else is supposed to be better than me!
  21. Not sure how you know that, but based on that I agree that you should reveal to the thread @Ashbringer
×
×
  • Create New...