Chaos

I would actually prefer the old AMA to be ressurrected than make a new topic. I will be merging this topic into the previous one.

New members need to wait a period of time before creating new pages. I'll likely have time to work on making the page this weekend. In the meantime, check out https://coppermind.net/wiki/Help:Contents This doesn't explain why you couldn't edit anonymously, but yeah if you were trying to make a brand new page that does not work anonymously. We need to discuss what the page should be called, for one thing... There was a lively discussion earlier today among Keepers about it.

Your anonymous edit went through. I imagine this is the one? https://coppermind.net/wiki/Kharbranth?&curid=198&diff=106641&oldid=104226 I'm not sure what sort of edit issues you're having? Please provide screenshots. EDIT: I think I had gotten confused because your edit went through, correcting the Unyielding Fidelity line, but I thought you were unable to edit so I assumed that was what was on the page before. Therefore, I didn't quite see the problem. You don't have to ask permission to change continuity errors, though if you're unsure, asking here or on Discord is a great idea.

Are you registered on the Coppermind? You should still be able to edit anonymously, but maybe this is because of the recent server move. Screenshots would help in diagnosing the problem. The reference to Unyielding Fidelity is correct on the Kharbranth article. Look on Chapter 108 in Oathbringer. Be sure to check citations to make sure you're right

Hello; this has been mentioned in a few places already. I have locked this topic as discussion can go in either of these locations.

They have from time to time requested such things, and we will acquiesce to this request. You're welcome to contact Dragonsteel about it, if you wish.

It is definitely not an actual kandra but something else, but I don't know if the Set's Faceless Immortals has a page right now. A lot of the Era 2 stuff needs a lot of work. There should be a dedicated page for those.

You can obviously correct an error if you see one. Which page are you referring to? We would like to not set the standard on having someone "own" a page. We do not think this is a good idea.

Which app in particular? I did the same thing on Soundcloud I always use, and it always goes off of the Soundcloud RSS feed: http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:102123174/sounds.rss?token=19b5f3-1-1563849249551 Yeah, I forgot to post the news topic here. I posted it on FB and Twitter though. Sorry about that.

Neither of those news posts (I assume that's what you mean for announcements) embedded properly for some reason. Maybe it is related. Email me the link to them to [email protected] or on Discord.

Huh. That's strange. Can you link me to which announcement you were trying to comment on, and which thing in Cosmere Q&A? I will investigate.

We made a news post on this Seems the Shinaian (who knows how that is spelled) is likely a type of Fused, I'd say probably the kind of Surge they are using. There was also the word Tisark in Oathbringer that could be another Fused type.

We actually got the word Regals from Oathbringer, so that part isn't quite new.

This could have been because it was labeled as a Suggestion and suggestions displaying wrong in search results. I resaved it and it now works fine on both. Search should still display the speaker lines, regardless of if it is a Suggestion or not.

He's always said the cosmere is pretty small, for the record. That's not really new, though he was imprecise about calling it a "dwarf galaxy" before.

I suppose it was dampened for me because it was yet another disgruntled Stark employee and yet another Tony superweapon. I didn't really like how we had flashbacks to old movies, like with the BARF and insert Gyllenhaal in there. It felt a little much.

I definitely see what you're saying that Marvel sticking to its guns on Mysterio's character here, and I think that's valid. However, I personally felt this made the plot feel quite generic and by-the-numbers. It was enjoyable, but predictable. I was talking to my girlfriend and she actually didn't know Mysterio was a villain, and she even still found the idea that Mysterio being a villain was extremely obvious. That was pretty crazy to me because I thought I would have enjoyed the movie a lot more if I somehow never knew Mysterio would be a villain, but she felt basically the same as I did with that lack of knowledge. I guess I just didn't love the movie much because its plot was so predictable. Every scene was enjoyable but it never exceeded the sum of its parts. I liked the end credit scenes, and loved Mysterio's final video. I thought Jake's acting, especially when he was being unhinged, was excellent. The Talos reveal was good. Peter making the suit was good. Like Homecoming, they nail the high school interactions. But I can't help but feel that I literally never will watch this movie again, whereas I would happily watch Homecoming again. It's very interesting to see a lot of people in this thread really love it. That's totally fine. I know a lot of people love Guardians 2 but I also felt that it was not as good as Guardians 1. I like strong, interesting plots, and I felt Far From Home was super mundane--and I felt Guardians 2 was too bloated and not tight enough.

I have removed several posts here referring to gaming the upvote system. Please do not do that. There will be no competitions for upvotes.

No, it's that I have to run a thing to delete them and I don't always do that. Earlier this week a lot came on the birthday list and I removed about 1440 spam accounts. I will remove these ones.

You must specifically post in this topic:

If you log on, you can edit the relevant entries to add your name as the Questioner. Please do so, that'd be great!