Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Don't have access to my home computer right now(its where I keep my memes) and don't have time to check this entire thread but just thought of something awesome.

 

Kaladin- "Bridgemen! CANYAH SMEEEEELL! WHAT ROCK! IS COOKIN!"

 

On a legitimate sidenote when reading SA Rock is The Rock. 

Posted

She was a thief by necessity. Besides, the rules were wrong. Breaking rules is bad. But if the rules themselves are bad, then, by the principle of Double Negatives, Vin was being good.

It's not a case of two wrongs making a right, if you're wondering.

Posted

I don't think that chickenplague was referring to the good part, but rather the lawful part. At least that's the problem that I see with it.

Posted

... um, I had to look it up on Google Translate. On the plus side, now I know something useful in French! :D

 

110wwf.jpg

 

I'm rereading WoR, and just got to the first Eshonai chapter. I forgot just how awesome this book is.

Posted

She was a thief by necessity. Besides, the rules were wrong. Breaking rules is bad. But if the rules themselves are bad, then, by the principle of Double Negatives, Vin was being good.

It's not a case of two wrongs making a right, if you're wondering.

But that's just being good.

Lawfulness has nothing to do with whether the rules make sense. It just cares about rules and order. Morality is for the good/evil spectrum.

Posted (edited)

But that's just being good.

Lawfulness has nothing to do with whether the rules make sense. It just cares about rules and order. Morality is for the good/evil spectrum.

 

Spoiler for HoA

But the time Vin spent holding Preservation might count towards "lawful". If Preservation is defining natural laws (because that power is what gave man sentience and a penchant for honor to begin with), and she sort of is Preservation for a time, then she can be considered the most lawful of all. If you can grasp what I'm trying to say. It makes sense in my head, at least.

Edited by Brightness Enna
Posted (edited)

White Sand preview pages reaction: White Sand + Avatar: The Last Airbender Parody Crossover - The Last Sandbender Presented by Cosmere Network

post-6459-0-17153200-1458527266_thumb.jp

tumblr_inline_o4bp8fpG2F1qkgqvb_540.jpg

(I’ve already changed the Chinese translation, which means “Shard falling on a [shard]world”.)

Another White Sand related one: Sand Master's Creed

post-6459-0-51449800-1458527548_thumb.jp

Edited by Botanica
Posted (edited)

White Sand preview pages reaction: White Sand + Avatar: The Last Airbender Parody Crossover - The Last Sandbender Presented by Cosmere Network

tumblr_inline_o4bp8fpG2F1qkgqvb_540.jpg

(I’ve already changed the Chinese translation, which means “Shard falling on a [shard]world”.)

Another White Sand related one:

:P This is great. Edited by Master Elodin
Posted (edited)

Spoilers bro. Just to be safe.

But the time Vin spent holding Preservation might count towards "lawful". If Preservation is defining natural laws (because that power is what gave man sentience and a penchant for honor to begin with), and she sort of is Preservation for a time, then she can be considered the most lawful of all. If you can grasp what I'm trying to say. It makes sense in my head, at least.

Preservation has nothing to do with law and order. If left to its own devices without Ruin it would try to turn Scadrial into a snow globe museum exhibit where nothing changes ever. It's no less harmful to society than Ruin was. It's Preservation, not Honor, we're talking about here. It provided enough investiture for sentience and allomancy, the rest was all on them.

If anything ignoring one's own intent to Preserve all creation to straight up go and slay gods is as unlawful as they come.

Edited by natc
Posted

Spoilers bro. Just to be safe.

Woops, thanks. Guess I'll go change that.

 

You make a good point. Preservation isn't Honor. I guess I got caught up in how Preservation is the "good" force and Ruin is the "bad", mostly ignoring intent. I can almost see why Vin was considered Lawful Good, but at the same time, someone else may have made more sense. Dalinar, maybe? Kaladin, kinda? Maybe Sarene or Raoden could count, too.

 

Still, I pretty much wholeheartedly agree with the rest of the chart. (I can't decide - is chaotic evil Stormfather or Odium? Because Stormfather doesn't make much sense to me.)

Posted

Cosmere alignment chart

attachicon.gifimage.png

 

Well done sir. Now to pick nits... I'd argue that any Vessel needs to be Lawfully aligned as they are all bound by the laws of their intent.

Posted

Well done sir. Now to pick nits... I'd argue that any Vessel needs to be Lawfully aligned as they are all bound by the laws of their intent.

While that's true, some Intents are chaotic and disorderly by nature.

Also, the Shards have some volition. Odium doesn't have to go around destroying Shards, he just does.

Posted

actually there is a WoB that says that if honor and odium had been held by different people then they would have attracted each other.

Posted

While that's true, some Intents are chaotic and disorderly by nature.

Also, the Shards have some volition. Odium doesn't have to go around destroying Shards, he just does.

Shardholders are strictly following rules which make them disorderly... or something...

Posted

As far as they are concerned, they are following the rules of their natures. However, this occasionally leads to their resident Shardworld experiencing increased entropy as a result of their actions.

You can argue that, as far as they are concerned, the Shards break no laws.

But that's not how justice works. If you follow laws that only apply to you, you're not truly following the laws.

Also, Szeth was bound by the laws governing Truthless.

Posted

Inspired by someone in the "What are you reading" thread who said they skipped to the end of a book:

 

w0ol6t.jpg

 

Spoiler for that same Alcatraz book (I forget which one it is... Knights of Crystallia?)

 

vxojv7.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...