Mint11 she/her Posted March 29 Posted March 29 11 hours ago, Doc12 said: 4) @Frozen Mint I'm sorry, could you explain why +3 to Miss? You guys aren't even in the same house, what makes you trust them so much? From my post on my village reads last cycle: Quote My current village reads are Mist and Fallen. Mist, because how they tried to catch Aman's "slip up" very early in the cycle felt village to me. It was also mentioned that Fallen was pushing for a prefect to be selected, which also sounds like a village move. Curious if anyone in Ravenclaw could elaborate on how the prefect vote has been going and if there has been any disagreement or debate on who should be prefect? @mippo (since you had mentioned people are just voting) This early post of doc's gave me village vibes: Honestly there isn't much to go off of on C1, but I think its important to commit to votes regardless. I have no idea what Aman's up to, and I'm also pretty sure the auror role is made up. Regardless, he's definitely lying about something which feels like a risky play for an elim. So I'm reading him as village now. coco, hopper, and twinstorm were all marked on the chopping block last cycle and received no positive votes. I'd expect elims to try to protect their own, so I'm reading all for of them as village as well. Okay I'm now going to do my best to resist temptation and log off for the rest of the day.
___ He/Him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 I was reading through the interactions here, and with regards to specific reads, strong V!coco I know people were already saying this, but still wanted to mention it. I've been v!reading TJ so far, but I'm starting to get concerned. This may just be a life thing, but as I've seen, he is usually way more active in analysis. He has been messaging sometimes, so I know sometimes he's online when he's not posting Beginning to slightly go e!lean on him.
TwinStorm He/Him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 1 minute ago, mippo said: h the interactions here, and with regards to specific reads, strong V!coco I know people were already saying this, but still wanted to mention it. I've been v!reading TJ so far, but I'm starting to get concerned. This may just be a life thing, but as I've seen, he is usually way more active in analysis. He has been messaging sometimes, so I know sometimes he's online when he's not posting why v/coco? clarify?
Doc12 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 17 minutes ago, Frozen Mint said: From my post on my village reads last cycle: Honestly there isn't much to go off of on C1, but I think its important to commit to votes regardless. I have no idea what Aman's up to, and I'm also pretty sure the auror role is made up. Regardless, he's definitely lying about something which feels like a risky play for an elim. So I'm reading him as village now. coco, hopper, and twinstorm were all marked on the chopping block last cycle and received no positive votes. I'd expect elims to try to protect their own, so I'm reading all for of them as village as well. I get it, my question is just. Mist was prolific in thread, most everyone gave him + points, which is fair. Fallen only showed up in thread once, and your read on her is entirely from secondhand reports of Ravenclaw PM. I do not understand why you decided to trust Fallen more with a +3 than Mist with a +2, do you understand what I'm asking? Anyways this cycle I'm interesting in voting on Mint, Fallen, and Ink. 1 minute ago, mippo said: I was reading through the interactions here, and with regards to specific reads, strong V!coco I know people were already saying this, but still wanted to mention it. I've been v!reading TJ so far, but I'm starting to get concerned. This may just be a life thing, but as I've seen, he is usually way more active in analysis. He has been messaging sometimes, so I know sometimes he's online when he's not posting Beginning to slightly go e!lean on him. Don't quite understand V!Coco from people. From my view, she has been present in thread but most of her content is agreeing with what other people are saying, which to me feels consistent with her behavior in LG108 and no one really sussed her til too late. I don't know if she's elim, but I'd want a lot more from her before I can begin to v!lean her.
___ He/Him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 9 minutes ago, TwinStorm said: why v/coco? clarify? 8 minutes ago, Doc12 said: I get it, my question is just. Mist was prolific in thread, most everyone gave him + points, which is fair. Fallen only showed up in thread once, and your read on her is entirely from secondhand reports of Ravenclaw PM. I do not understand why you decided to trust Fallen more with a +3 than Mist with a +2, do you understand what I'm asking? Anyways this cycle I'm interesting in voting on Mint, Fallen, and Ink. Don't quite understand V!Coco from people. From my view, she has been present in thread but most of her content is agreeing with what other people are saying, which to me feels consistent with her behavior in LG108 and no one really sussed her til too late. I don't know if she's elim, but I'd want a lot more from her before I can begin to v!lean her. Just vibes If y'all can't tell I'm a vibes guy All of her posts seems like she's really trying to get info from others, not just doing fake analysis. Honestly asking questions to archer probably has do do with it too. 10 minutes ago, Doc12 said: From my view, she has been present in thread but most of her content is agreeing with what other people are saying, which to me feels consistent with her behavior in LG108 and no one really sussed her til too late. I don't know if she's elim, but I'd want a lot more from her before I can begin to v!lean her. Alr, I wasn't in that game so idk
Doc12 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) Other anagrams for Tom Bombadil Donuts: I am bold bold sun bottom I am sod bold mold button I am odd lot boston bum I am blond dum boots boots I am tom's blond doubt I am dobson butt mold Edited March 29 by Doc12 2
___ He/Him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Just now, Doc12 said: Other anagrams for Tom Bombadil Donuts: I am bold bold sun bottom I am sod bold mold button I am odd lot boston bum I am blond dum boots boots I am tom's blond doubt I am dobson butt mold OH NO Anything but that
Ink and Embers Any pronouns Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) How often are secret roles introduced with absolutely no context whatsoever? I have enough faith in Aman's ability to confuse people that it could be a massive bluff, in which case I'm extremely impressed. If not, I really don't see the point in claiming to have scanned someone you haven't scanned. Apologies for the low activity on my part but I have fairly little to say, aside from trying to understand what's happening! Edited March 29 by Through the Living Ink Tone
|TJ| he/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 9 hours ago, Amanuensis said: You know, I genuinely didn't anticipate so many players neglecting their strongest votes. Re: my strongest village vote, it was a mistake and an oversight. This was my actual vote -> Aman -> +2 Mistfallen -> +2 Qian -> +1 mippo -> +1 Araris -> -1 Hopper -> -2 I split the +6 four-way but then Archer said duplication was not allowed and I typed up a message that said to change Aman to +3 and nothing to Mippo, but apparently I never hit send and then I was away for the rest of the cycle -.- Also, I'm quite tired from yesterday because I travelled to another city and I had a shift early in the morning and the clocks went forward last night as well, which means I am sleep deprived, so I've only glanced through the thread and did not yet check last cycle's ending, so I'm just going to keep it for tomorrow. I do agree with Aman re: elims could be deliberately killing players who seemingly could win Extra Credit. This is why I did not give any numbers in my posts - On 3/28/2026 at 12:36 AM, |TJ| said: These would be my positive and negative votes. I will keep the exact numbers to myself till I get a confirmation about something from Archer. The question I asked Archer was "if the person with the highest number of votes was killed, would Extra Credit be given to the next highest votes?". Archer said no and I did not mention it in the thread afterwards so as to not give elims any ideas if they hadn't thought about this. Now there could be 2 cases - (a) they are only observing where the positive votes are going and then killing in that pool or (b) they are actively contributing to the positive votes and targeting specific players to ensure they get highest votes and then killing them. Further questions arise like - "if case (b), why target-vote Mistfallen over Doc?" which leads us to think about Doc's alignment. Either Doc is e and/or they preferred to hit in Hufflepuff. We can also entirely stop giving out our positive points/names in the thread to reduces the chances of this happening again if it is case (a). We'll also know for sure that if it happens again, it means we are in case (b) world. I'd like to cast a net on both case (a) and case (b), we do have 3 slots to give negative points to, and I'll need to check for any relations and pairings to see if anything makes either case more likely than the other and the 3rd slot can go to that. I'll need to re-read for that though, and that is for tomorrow. Sorry, like I said, I am quite tired >> @mippo I try to check SE at work, but I do get interrupted and I do not do any re-read or analysis which would lead to long posts when I am at work as I'm afraid I'd lose the post. Another quick thought - purely vibe-reading TUM as village for not submitting any positive points.
Qianweilian He/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) I may not have drawing skills, but I can make stupid anagrams! @Archer Spoiler @Amanuensis Spoiler @Through The Living Grass Spoiler @coco.pudding Spoiler @Through the Living Hopper Spoiler @Through the Living Mist Spoiler @Through the living Wahr Spoiler @TwinStorm Spoiler @Through the Living Ink Spoiler @Doc12 Spoiler @mippo Spoiler I hope you’re French @|TJ| Spoiler T||J @Miss Fallen Spoiler @Emperor Comatose Spoiler @The Unknown Medallion Spoiler @Frozen Mint Spoiler Spoiler You know, the 17th shard maximum attachment size is significantly larger than you would think. Me: Edited March 29 by Qianweilian I'm stupid. They're anagrams, not acronyms. 5
Ink and Embers Any pronouns Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) 1 hour ago, Qianweilian said: I may not have drawing skills, but I can make stupid acronyms! @Archer Reveal hidden contents @Amanuensis Reveal hidden contents @Through The Living Grass Reveal hidden contents @coco.pudding Reveal hidden contents @Through the Living Hopper Reveal hidden contents @Through the Living Mist Hide contents @Through the living Wahr Reveal hidden contents @TwinStorm Reveal hidden contents @Through the Living Ink Hide contents @Doc12 Reveal hidden contents @mippo Reveal hidden contents I hope you’re French @|TJ| Reveal hidden contents T||J @Miss Fallen Reveal hidden contents @Emperor Comatose Reveal hidden contents @The Unknown Medallion Reveal hidden contents @Frozen Mint Reveal hidden contents Reveal hidden contents You know, the 17th shard maximum attachment size is significantly larger than you would think. Me: I LOVE THIS SO MUCH!!!!! Evil thinking through... Edited March 29 by Through the Living Ink
coco.pudding she/they Posted March 29 Posted March 29 2 hours ago, Through The Living Grass said: Why would it matter? Hufflepuff would still be out a prefect. I asked about that bc of the whole “maybe the elims killed Araris so coco could be prefect” thing. Has nothing to do with Hufflepuff. In that same vein was Mist prefect?
Through the living Wahr He/Him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Beware it is I "HALVING THROUGH WITHER"
Doc12 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 22 minutes ago, Qianweilian said: Hide contents Pictured: Leonidas v Pali duel Hufflepuff chess match Penwell family reunion 5
Qianweilian He/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 9 minutes ago, Through the living Wahr said: Beware it is I "HALVING THROUGH WITHER" Ah! Run!
Verdance he/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 28 minutes ago, coco.pudding said: I asked about that bc of the whole “maybe the elims killed Araris so coco could be prefect” thing. Has nothing to do with Hufflepuff. In that same vein was Mist prefect? Yeah, i screwed up badly last round, didnt really think the elims would kill Mist cause that would just leave me alone, so I voted +3 for him in hopes he would get us Friendship or Owl Mail, on top of being the prefect, since he’s more experienced. But apparently elims padded his positive votes, and no one was as suspicious of him as i thought, so his points went completely to waste.
Through the living Wahr He/Him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 So apparently we have already abbandoned the idea of sharing vote and having accountability. I unfortunately didnt take notes on who claimed to vote for whom But scanning the thread and using Docs last Vote count I have created an hopefully accurated Table regarding who people claimed to vote and who they voted, if I missed something please let me now (and link the relevant post) Quote Aman: Twin -3; Mippo -2; TUM -1; Ink +1; Grass +2; Mint +3 Grass: Araris -2; Aman -1; Mist +3 Coco: Araris -X; Hopper -X; Qian +X; Mist +X; Twin +X Twin: Wahr -3; TUM -2; Coco -1; Grass +1; Mist +2; Doc +3 Doc: TUM -X; Hopper -X; Coco -X; Mist +X; Aman +X Qian: Coco -X; TUM -X TJ: Araris -X; Hopper -X; Mist +X; Mippo +X TUM: Aman -X; Araris -X; Doc -X So Green Names are Claims that fit with the actuall votes Red names are Claims that have not been voted in that Way Things to Note, Aman apparently lied completely. I dont like that since he is the one that proposed it. He warned us that there was Missinformation in his posted Votes but I had assumed there would be truth to it none the less. Grass lied about 1 of 3 votes (10/30) Coco lied about 2 of 5 votes (12/30) Twin lied about 1 of 6 votes (5/30) Qian lied about 1 of 2 votes (15/30) TUM did not lie about any Votes, if hed did it would have been an instant red flag for me. I could see an Coco / Twin e/e pair considering they lied about voting each other So in order to get the Vote sharing back on here are my current votes Positives: TUM and TJ (appreciate the honesty and TUM sticking to the acountability) Negatives: Aman, coco, Doc (dont like how much Aman and Coco have lied about their votes, Doc is still under generall suspicion) Now if anyone points out mistakes I made, I will gladly correct them and depending on the Mistake am Open to changing my current votes
Amanuensis he/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) Nah, I only mislead about -3 on Twin. No one apparently read my vote counts despite my effort I am genuinely surprised anyone gave Mist positive votes Edited March 29 by Amanuensis
The Unknown Medallion he/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 3 hours ago, Through the Living Ink said: How often are secret roles introduced with absolutely no context whatsoever? I have enough faith in Aman's ability to confuse people that it could be a massive bluff, in which case I'm extremely impressed. If not, I really don't see the point in claiming to have scanned someone you haven't scanned. Apologies for the low activity on my part but I have fairly little to say, aside from trying to understand what's happening! Never, that's not allowed (sometimes rulesets have secrets, but the presence of secrets must be declared and still approved) We are all joking 2 hours ago, Qianweilian said: I may not have drawing skills, but I can make stupid anagrams! @Archer Reveal hidden contents @Amanuensis Hide contents @Through The Living Grass Hide contents @coco.pudding Hide contents @Through the Living Hopper Hide contents @Through the Living Mist Hide contents @Through the living Wahr Hide contents @TwinStorm Hide contents @Through the Living Ink Hide contents @Doc12 Hide contents @mippo Hide contents I hope you’re French @|TJ| Hide contents T||J @Miss Fallen Hide contents @Emperor Comatose Hide contents @The Unknown Medallion Hide contents @Frozen Mint Hide contents Hide contents You know, the 17th shard maximum attachment size is significantly larger than you would think. Me: Well that's settled Through the Living Ink 8 minutes ago, Amanuensis said: Nah, I only mislead about -3 on Twin. No one apparently read my vote counts despite my effort I am genuinely surprised anyone gave Mist positive votes You think we can read?
Verdance he/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) 1 hour ago, Through the living Wahr said: So apparently we have already abbandoned the idea of sharing vote and having accountability. I unfortunately didnt take notes on who claimed to vote for whom But scanning the thread and using Docs last Vote count I have created an hopefully accurated Table regarding who people claimed to vote and who they voted, if I missed something please let me now (and link the relevant post) Things to Note, Aman apparently lied completely. I dont like that since he is the one that proposed it. He warned us that there was Missinformation in his posted Votes but I had assumed there would be truth to it none the less. Grass lied about 1 of 3 votes (10/30) Coco lied about 2 of 5 votes (12/30) Twin lied about 1 of 6 votes (5/30) Qian lied about 1 of 2 votes (15/30) TUM did not lie about any Votes, if hed did it would have been an instant red flag for me. I could see an Coco / Twin e/e pair considering they lied about voting each other So in order to get the Vote sharing back on here are my current votes Positives: TUM and TJ (appreciate the honesty and TUM sticking to the acountability) Negatives: Aman, coco, Doc (dont like how much Aman and Coco have lied about their votes, Doc is still under generall suspicion) Now if anyone points out mistakes I made, I will gladly correct them and depending on the Mistake am Open to changing my current votes I did not lie, i became more convinced that Aman was elim over time and chose not to share my votes again. i was initially very suspicious of Araris but i haven’t had any reason to continue that suspicion since I also very much think vote sharing is a negative now, as it lost village team an Extra Credit, and my friend. So I am slightly wary of Wahr if he’s pushing vote sharing. Edited March 29 by Through The Living Grass
Through the living Wahr He/Him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 14 minutes ago, Amanuensis said: Nah, I only mislead about -3 on Twin. No one apparently read my vote counts despite my effort I am genuinely surprised anyone gave Mist positive votes I tried but they only include the negative votes, I wanted both for my list, also it was a lot easier to use Docs Vote count since it listed the placed votes and not the recieved votes like yours, but I believe I did use yours to gather some of the numerical values, the other ones I got from searching the thread. Which is abusrdely hard if everyone represents their votes diffrently and I had 11 pages to search. 2 minutes ago, Through The Living Grass said: I did not lie, i became more convinced that Aman was elim over time and chose not to share my votes again. well that is something I coulnd have known. Also what were your reasons for that conclusion
Amanuensis he/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) Yeah I think we can say our village reads but once Archer clarified the Top Child can die with Extra Credit we should be a lot more careful with any positive vote indications The only thing that matters for discussion is who we will kill and we should still be tracking it That said I am on the brink of almost failing a class again so I am going to actually let y'all take the lead from here and hope I die sooner rather than later Actually nevermind, I might request a pinch hitter after I finish my data analysis, probably a better use of my town slot. I just don't know if I will be able to get it done before this turns rollover Edited March 29 by Amanuensis
Verdance he/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 4 minutes ago, Through the living Wahr said: I tried but they only include the negative votes, I wanted both for my list, also it was a lot easier to use Docs Vote count since it listed the placed votes and not the recieved votes like yours, but I believe I did use yours to gather some of the numerical values, the other ones I got from searching the thread. Which is abusrdely hard if everyone represents their votes diffrently and I had 11 pages to search. well that is something I coulnd have known. Also what were your reasons for that conclusion Less of a conclusion, more vibes. The playstyle feels familiar to another person i know from IRL werewolf games that is very very good at manipulation as a werewolf via assertive action and over analysis. I’m unfortunately not great at this specific blend of social deduction game when it comes to analysis, not yet, since I rely a lot on seer type gambits and concrete one person or another is lying things, so I’m doing my best to adapt to this, but relying mainly on instinct for now. that said, if I die this cycle, someone Owl Mail me, I have a test running right now that should hard clear at least one person.
coco.pudding she/they Posted March 29 Posted March 29 2 hours ago, Through the living Wahr said: Coco lied about 2 of 5 votes (12/30) So when did I lie about those votes? I believe I said early on who I was going to put positives on. I can find the post later if you’d like. Also, what do the number mean? (12/30 and all that)
Qianweilian He/him Posted March 29 Posted March 29 2 hours ago, Through the living Wahr said: Qian lied about 1 of 2 votes (15/30) Did I declare a vote? If I did, I must have forgot about it and changed my mind. Sorry if I was being misleading.
Recommended Posts