Immortal Platypus

To live long? Yes. Right now I'm actually feeling pretty good though. TPBM hates it when people complain about things that they've made no effort to fix.

i'm bored

I just think it's funny that you changed names in the meme

Can confirm, the TV show is not accurate to the books. Also, @|TJ|, can I get put on the spec list?

... except the little bit at the end. The definition doesn't say that something has to touch a liquid. other than that, I largely concur.

yeah, that's about what I was thinking

the word isn't filled, it's saturated which means "full of moisture : made thoroughly wet." By that definition, I think that a single molecule of water would qualify, but it's a matter of personal opinion. hate to break it to you, you quoted/mentioned the wrong guy. That wasn't me. That was @scientificmotif.

I'm a rambleman? That doesn't sound right. I barely even ramble. I'm always straight and to the point. Now back in my day, we didn't call people ramblers. It was considered impolite.

the temptation to make a meme about your degrading activity of making memes on the law of degrading activity was strong. but I don't have a meme-maker that isn't blocked by my school

that's actually dope. good luck with it!

a) no, that is not the definition of water (sorry, just saw this and felt the need to correct it) and b) water can totally be covered by other water. as I tire of saying "saturated" is part of the definition. By definition, all water is wet, even if it is the surface and not completely enveloped in water. In addition, saying something must be completely enveloped in water to be wet is simply untrue (both by definition and by common use of the word). When I say my arm is wet it doesn't need to be enveloped, if just the top is wet, I would still call my arm wet. I disagree with your definition, but I think I'll leave it at that for here. more analysis below. I think that by terms, "water is wet" and "water is not wet" are required to be opposing arguments, but that's not important. Dictionaries are not the final word, but they are a reliable way to find a consistent definition. Please note that in most (if not all) of my responses I qualify my statement of "water is wet" with the term "definitionally" or "by definition." This is meant to clarify that by the definition cited, water is wet. You are not required to use dictionary definitions, I just personally think that it weakens an argument to rely on a non-standardized (or, again, as close as we can get) definition. It's a matter of personal opinion. of course it is. The very topic is pointless, and depends on your definition of "wet." However, nearly any topic (if not just plain any topic) will have subjectivity thrown in, so being subjective is not necessarily a cause of it being pointless. I didn't view what I said as "hounding" you about dictionary definitions, but if you saw it that way, I apologize. personally I think that the bolded sentence feels passive-aggressive, and I'd appreciate it if you avoided things like that. I'm sure you didn't mean to, and again, I apologize if my response annoyed or frustrated you. Anyway, yes, wet can be used in different ways. However, due to context clues, we can see that it uses the adjective definition, so the verb and noun definitions don't need to come into play. I hadn't thought of that argument, but because it is an adjective describing paint, I personally think that it implies that the paint is wet (because of itself, not because another liquid acted on it), and/or has the capability to make other things wet.

it was something I thought might work, but realized that it totally wouldn't

fair enough. remind me to hack your account and remove myself from the list. wait... will that work? nope, it won't. dang it. it would've been cool

yo, since Eddie's back and posting, I can finally post again!