-
Posts
276 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by BreezeCauthon
-
An actual quote from William of Malmesbury's Chronicle of the Kings of England, a near-contemporary account of this occurrence from the conquests of William the Conqueror:
QuoteFavoured by God’s assistance, he [William] easily reduced the city of Exeter, when it had rebelled; for part of the wall fell down accidentally, and made an opening for him. Indeed he had attacked it with the more ferocity, asserting that those irreverent men would be deserted by God’s favour, because one of them, standing upon the wall, had bared his posteriors, and had broken wind, in contempt of the Normans.
-
Next time somebody starts an RP, let me know first, because they always seem interesting, but I always notice them after they've been going too long to hop in.
- Show previous comments 6 more
-
Fellowship is not easy to join, I speak from @Experience join Side Tales
Or RoP.
-
-
-
If you ever feel like your governor is bad, just be glad they aren't Henry S. Johnston of Oklahoma (governor from 1927-29), who was impeached and removed by the Oklahoma state legislature for "general incompetence." I mean, yikes. That's gotta sting a little. (I was going to end here, but... it gets more interesting).
The remainder of Johnston's term was served by his lieutenant governor, William J. Holloway. In the next election, Oklahomans said "ah what the heck, why not?" and elected this guy, "Alfalfa Bill" Murray:
At one point, Texas and Oklahoma agreed to build a toll-free bridge (for reference, we will call this The Bridge) across the Red River (which composed the border of the two states). However, the owners of a nearby toll bridge (for reference, we will call this The Other Bridge) sued Texas and obtained an injunction against the opening of The Bridge. Texas, in accordance with the injunction, closed The Bridge, barricading it on the Texas end.
Alfalfa Bill wasn't having this, so he ordered The Bridge open, invaded Texas (claiming that both sides of the river actually belonged to Oklahoma), and demolished the barricades. Texas Gov. Ross Sterling sent troops to guard the prompt rebuilding of barricades.
While this was happening, Alfalfa Bill blew up The Other Bridge, and declared martial law over both bridges. At this point, the opposition crumbled, The Bridge was opened, and the injunction was lifted.
Alfalfa Bill mobilized the National Guard 47 times as governor, and declared martial law a whopping 30 times (both were, and, if I am correct, still are, records). The end.
-
Today's history thingummybob (credit to @Channelknight Fadran for alerting me to this story):
_______________________________________________________________________________
Once there was an Australian guy in France named 'Fats.' Well, his real name was Lawrence Dominic McCarthy, but he was a bit pudgy, so his fellow soldiers called him Fats.
This was in WWI, by the way.
If you know one thing about WWI, it's probably this: trenches. Basically, two sides would dig big long trenches and sit there taking potshots at each other, for somewhere between weeks and years. Every now and again, one side or the other would amass their troops, and send them charging across no-man's land, usually to get massacred, but occasionally to conquer the enemy trench and end the stalemate.
Fats clearly wasn't a big fan of the whole 'amassing' thing, so one day as his troops were amassing, he grabbed a pal and charged off essentially by himself, leaving the rest of his troops in the dust.
By some miracle, he made it to a machine gun nest, which he promptly cleared. Then, with nothing but his rifle and pal, he entered the German trench and captured THREE more machine gun nests. His buddy was wounded, but Fats continued fighting (picking up some German grenades along the way). By the end of the day, he had captured over 1,500 feet of trench, killed 22 Germans, and captured over 50.
After this, as Fadran correctly puts it: "the German prisoners surrounded him and proceeded to congratulate him on his pure, unbounded awesomeness."
One official historian called this "perhaps the most effective feat of individual fighting in the history of the Australian Imperial Forces." The end.
-
Okay, here's your history story for the week.
______________________________________________________________________________________
The year is 1198. Pope Innocent III wants very much to unleash another crusade upon the Holy Land, and he wants two men at its head: King Richard the Lionheart of England and King Philip II of France, some of the most powerful nobles in Europe.
Unfortunately the two kings were not on speaking terms. They had a falling out after the last crusade. So the Pope dispatched a legate (one Peter of Capua) to Richard to try and mend the gap.
Peter informed the King that his hostility towards Philip was harming the Christian presence in the Holy Land, and would he consider making up?
Richard responded with the classic "he started it" argument, pointing out that Philip had absconded from the Third Crusade early on and used the opportunity to steal much of Richard's land in northern Europe. When Richard returned to Europe, he was imprisoned by rivals, and Philip exerted influence to keep him imprisoned. So, concluded Richard, he would only come to an agreement if Philip returned every last piece of stolen land.
In a masterpiece of passive-aggression, Peter of Capua replied: "Ah, sire, how true it is that no one can have everything that he wants."
Richard had no response to this put-down, and agreed to a five-year truce conditional upon the return of only some of his lands.
Peter had now what he wanted, but unwisely decided to press the advantage. Would King Richard mind also releasing from captivity Bishop Philip Beauvais? After all, it wasn't right to hold a churchman prisoner.
As a matter of fact, Richard did mind. (Bishop Philip had encouraged Richard's jailers to treat him harshly during Richard's own captivity, and had taken up arms against Richard. He was "one of the men Richard hated most in all the world," according to a near-contemporary history).
Richard had, to put it simply, had enough, and unleashed an impressive rant:
Quote"By my head, he is deconsecrated for he is a false Christian. It was not as a bishop that he was captured, but as a knight, fighting and fully armed, a laced helmet on his head. Sir Hypocrite! What a fool you are! If you had not been an envoy I would send you back with something to show the pope which he would not forget! Never did the pope raise a finger to help me when I was in prison and wanted his help to be free. And now he asks me to set free a robber and an incendiary who has never done me anything but harm. Get out of here, Sir Traitor; liar, trickster, corrupt dealer in churches, and never let me see you again!"
Peter had no passive-aggressive response with which to mollify the King. And to cap it all off, Richard threatened to have the legate castrated.
Peter bowed before this superior line of intellectual argumentation, and left.
Neither Richard nor Philip II ended up participating in the Fourth Crusade, which succeeded in doing little other than sacking allied Constantinople. The end.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
-
I'm considering posting a weekly humorous historical fact/story. But I figured I would gauge interest first so that I'm not just posting into a disinterested void.
Here is a free sample (not that the rest of it wouldn't be free, but... yeah.):
__________________________________________________________________________________
In the late 800s AD, there was this Viking leader named (impressively) Sigurd the Mighty. At one point he challenged a Pictish leader (with the much less impressive name of Mael Brigte the Bucktoothed. Remember that. It's important.) to a 40v40 battle to settle a quarrel. Mael Brigte agreed, and arrived on the appointed day.
However, Sigurd decided to pull what is known as a pro gamer move, and brought 80 men instead of 40.Needless to say, he was victorious. To celebrate the totally fair and well-earned victory, he beheaded Mael Brigte and hung the poor guy's head on the side of his saddle. Sigurd clearly hadn't read Proverbs 16:18...
On the ride home, Sigurd cut his calf on Mael Brigte's evidently outrageous front teeth. The cut subsequently became infected and Sigurd died. The end.
______________________________________________________________________________________
So yeah. Should I do more?
