NameIess

How would a Mistborn kill a KR with full shardplate, a sword that can cut through anything that is not heavily invested, and regeneration powers, along with differing powers based on their order. Also Truthwatchers (and maybe Edgedancers) can survive having their head crushed, Renarin did so several times when fighting the thunderclast.

Shallan survived a crossbow bolt to the head in OB, and TLR might not have metals in him, when Vin ripped his Atium minds off of him, he immediately started aging, also if he had steel charged up, why didn't he use it when Vin ripped his Atium metalminds of?, he could have gotten them back on by using speed. On Roshar, TLRs army would be destroyed by the storm, on Scadrial, the Rosharans would be blindsided by the mists, that is why I made it a neutral planet.

So TLR would eventually run out of attributes and die. Edit- actually he would run before he ran out

Okay, but they still regenerate, have living shardplate, which may be indestructible while they have stormlight, also, is there a limit to the amount of an attribute that you can store in a metalmind? because that would put a limit on TLR'd healing/strength/speed as he normally doesn't cover himself in metal. they were teleported there by a bunch of fans who wanted to see who would win. starting a war that would have massive causalities for their own entertainment

Exactly, TLR is stupid and arrogant enough to see a Knight Radiant, laugh at them, and then let them stab him with a shardblade without running f-gold at a high enough rate to survive, (if you can survive a shardblade with f-gold).

How can a fullborn kill 2,000 Radiants with shardplate?

Okay, I know that this topic has been brought up before, but I have new rules. Scadrial Era 1, versus Roshar after the last desolation but before the Recreance. They are fighting on a neutral planet, with no affect from differing gravity's or diseases. the different factions of Roshar have combined together to defeat Scadrial, the knights radiant are at full capacity, with three bondsmiths, about 200 Radiants of the fourth or fifth ideals per order, (based off of Dalinar's vision of the Windrunners and Stonewards) and then an unknown but probably larger number of second and third ideal Radiants, and an even larger number of squires. Scadrial has the kolloss, the steel inquisitors, an uncertain amount of Mistborn, somwere from 30-60, kandra who are bound by the first contract, The Lord Ruler, and mistings, of which there is an uncertain amount. Both sides have whatever armies they can muster in one year, Roshar has access to refiling stormlight, not unliminted, but what they would get from storms normally, but no Heralds. who would win?

But if they would use him to destroy, they would fail the test.

Okay thanks, so the way Nightblood avoids destroying good is picking good people to wield him.

Could you post those WoBs please? I have read the books and annotations, but they don't say that Nightblood would destroy someone good, Vasher seems to think so, but the annotations say this: Which could mean that Vasher is not completely reliable when he thinks about how Nightblood cannot tell the difference between good and evil, I am probably completely wrong about this, but I just want to be sure.

If I held a shard it probably wouldn't change, because my willpower wouldn't be strong enough to change it's intent.

Well... the soldiers were consumed by the thrill or involved in a plot to start an all out war that would end in countless deaths, the person who made him made nightblood, the thunderclast and the fused were both actively involved in a war to kill or enslave all humanity on Roshar, and the nobleman used the money he was given to mantain the prison for himself, leaving the prisoners to starve in a cell with one guard and no light. so no, None of those people could possibly be good in my eyes.

But Nightblood has never destroyed a sentient who is not considered "evil" has he? has he ever been used against someone "good"? the only people he has been used against that I know of are nameless soldiers, the person who made him, a thunderclast, a corrupt nobleman, and a fused, never a "good guy" so to speak. the eating of the investure of the people who wield him is like the price of him being drawn, I don't think it is the same as him vaporizing someone. I do agree that Nightblood can destroy all inanimate objects.

I have a question, could Nightblood destroy something that wasn't evil? Like if I had a person whose spiritual and cognitive aspects included no evil and stabbed him with Nightblood, would Nightblood kill him? Because Nightbloods intent is "Destroy evil" can he also destroy good? what about inanimate objects? that would be trickier as their cognitive aspects would be based on how other people see them, so if a few people saw them as evil, they might be defined as evil, technically.

I agree, 100% you win for sure.

relie reewy baod spilend

power: The ability to manipulate any form of energy, including kinetic energy, laser, energy shields, heat, and flame, or I can absorb it and release it whenever I want to treating it as my own energy, however, I cannot convert between different energy types, or generate energy by myself, so I must absorb it from outside sources, like bullets or nuclear explosions . Secondary power: time manipulation, I can slow or speed up time for myself or others, even freezing it in bubbles for as long as I want. However, I can only freeze a certain area/number of people at a time, and I have almost reached my limit for unknown reasons. Weakness: letting people I love die. I have permanently frozen in time my hometown to keep my family safe, which puts serious limits on my time powers. Name: Manipulation Costume: Normal clothes Personality: I obsessively hunt and kill any high Epics as I see them as potential threats to my family, but I will also kill regular epics or people if I see them as a threat, if I saw the Reckoners, I would kill them on sight. If I saw you as not a threat to me, I would be perfectly friendly, but I wouldn't form any permanent friendships for fear of tripping my weakness, I wouldn't kill you unless you got in the way of me eliminating a threat.

But wouldn't the soulcasters have noticed that uncut gemstones broke less often?

I think that the 4th and 5th ideals will be something like: "I will accept my failures, and will not let them destroy me" and: "I will kill only when it is a choice between protecting innocents, or letting evil triumph" but I don't know what order they would be in, knowing when and who to kill would be needed against Moash/Vyre, but accepting failure looks like it's currently Kaladin's main issue.