Frustration

Maybe you would like the alchemy magic I have going, be several years before publication becomes vaiable though.

And then what? He can't win that way.

I would say that they would be able to return to normal, or maybe base level Investiture, as blank connection can be stored, why not blank Investiture.

WE know that, but Odium doesn't, and riding off Dalinar breaking Odium's faith in his own foresight, I doubt he would do it, and if he did it would just be a stalemate.

Leaving the Spren would probably be a bad idea, who says the Spren can handle that? And Hoid is not wasting a good Spren.

Baby can't kill Dalinar/whoever ends up Radiant champ, and on the off chance that the Radiant champion does kill them, then Odium losses, hands down, so he'd be dumb to pick one in the first place. Secondly if no one wins everyone loses, Odium can't make Dalinar free him for that.

Hoid does know, he gets to Scandrial on time for Era 2.

Thing is, the child can't kill Dalinar, so why would not killing the child be an Odium win?

Death Rattle, just one.

Spoiled for length @Nameless I used a Grian meme Also sorry about the formatting everyone, I don't like it either.

If we're spiking a snail/slug with steel we need to make it compound, I am not waiting for it to store speed, before making the events of 'Turbo' happen.

I didn't feel it was overly slow, but I also don't know how on earth Brandon is going to keep up the breakneck pacing of SA for seven more books so take my thoughts how you will.

So you can only compound when the metals line up. Additionally when someone is both a Feruchemist, and a Mistborn it's called a FullBorn.

I'm going to push back just a bit here so one thing that people misunderstand about my Moral viewpoint is the only two groups so people within them must be 100%, well no, it's a spectrum, but there is only good and evil, like a number-line, Zero representing those too young or incapable of making their own decisions for whatever reason;but other than that there are only two groups positive and negative, but there are literally infinite places along that line. As to your relative, I can't say, personally I don't judge whether a person is good or evil by adding up their actions, judging a persons place is hard. Something I think we can agree upon, as what knowledge they had, and their intentions play a large role. For example I think that people who aren't as socially aware would be less responsible for social missteps. However I do not believe that there is a middle ground or grayness, my most controversial take.

In my opinion it's based on shape, the other allomantic metals get their power by their shape, like Aons, I think Aluminum's shape is like a sink/drain.

Clever man, very clever.

Well then he's failed because Elantris 2 is coming and we're going to get book 7 of Mistborn.

From a philosophical standpoint, question everything as to why you know good from evil, now we're entering religious waters and I think it would be best if we don't debate that.

I'm male.

Who dares dampen me.

I don't know about you but I define murder as the shedding of inocent blood. To say you have to have made 100% good or bad choices to be considered either or, is not what I meant, have you tried to the best of your knowledge and understanding tried to help people and do what is right? If yes you are a good person, even if you make mistakes. So slavery was totally justified and there was no moral wrongdoing by slavers, good to know. Now we get into knowledge, if a child was raised thinking that you should kill everyone on sight, 'brainwashed' basically, the act would be wrong but the child not knowing better would still be inocent. I think that there is a definitive moral code, humans just don't have it yet. But we can feel it, you know deep down when something is wrong, ignoring that voice, that tells you when your doing something your not supposed to is what constitutes evil.

See, here is the thing, only one of thos is murder. If someone has the means and threatened to destroy the world and you killed them, you have not shed inocent blood. And yes it is black and white, name a person who isn't either good or evil, and I will name you a person that doesn't exist. And this has to do with the discussion why? Hitler did what he felt was right, was he "exactly as evil as humanity" the problem with morality is subjective arguments is that they fall apart. If only perception matters why is your veiw better than Hitler's? Why can't people steal if they think it's right? Society would cease to exsist if this where taken to it's logical conclusion. And? So what? That doesn't make him good or even gain sympathy from me every war that has been fought from the dawn of time has in one way or another been about land why should this be different?

his numbers are as follows: 01010000 01100001 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110

This is what I'm calling them now.

That would be a herself and yes it was intentionally breaking a piece off of Endowment, most shards do it, another major example would be the unmade.