-
Posts
8927 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
106
AonEne's Achievements
8.4k
Reputation
48
Community Answers
Single Status Update
-
Hear me out: what if you had the dystopian evil government and the main character goes off and joins a resistance group.
And then it turns out that the resistance psychologically conditioned him/her and the government is either doing some not great things, but still keeping the world together or making mistakes while overall putting out good effort or genuinely just good and fighting the problems they supposedly cause, and the rebellion is actually what needs to be defeated, because they’re trying to bring down the actual social structure that keeps the world from anarchy.
I mean, sometimes I worry about people joining terrorist groups of whatever country they live in because alllll the books do it and just...governments are flawed, okay, but if we overthrew them, in most cases things are gonna get way worse. The situation won’t improve. You just took down society and now you have to rebuild and deal with everything the gov. was. (Which can also be done well - hello, Mistborn - but only really if the ones in charge are evil or if the protagonists realize what they did was wrong.)
Also, give me a character who, rather than being defiant in a situation that they shouldn’t be, does the sensible thing and caves. Let a starving character break and take the food offered by their captor. Let a character who’s been conditioned to expect pain at fighting back actually stop fighting back, and quickly. Let characters be human!
Hm, maybe I should stop ranting about stuff before people start to think I hate all literature
- Show previous comments 5 more
-
Wait, so you [Silva] are basically writing a novel where everyone is satisfied with their lot? Because if I have learned anything from reading history, no matter how good anything is no one is ever satisfied with their lot. Unless of course you are writing about a failed resistance, those happen a lot in literature and history.
-
Just because there isn’t active rebellion that’s in the right doesn’t mean there’s not active rebellion, and even if there was no rebellion at all, that doesn’t mean people are all content - just that no one is forming a revolution.
-
Yeah, I get where you're coming from. Although wherever you look in authoritarian societies there is always people trying to resist, even just if only in small ways.
Though 'tis true that you can have rebellions that are in the wrong. In fact, most rebellions are, and I would be interested to see some more fiction with this element included within them.
- Show next comments 3 more