Jump to content

TheMightyLopen

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2241

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TheMightyLopen

  1. TheMightyLopen
    Sorry for not getting any player analysis up lately. It doesn't look like I'll be able to tonight either, but I will just say that Elbereth is becoming more suspicious to me and Ripple and Feligon less so. This is just because of reading through their posts and what we think we know. Ripple vocally opposed Mail's list, and if Mail was indeed a Diagrammist, I don't think that Ripple would have done that if she was one as well. It's possible, but to me, it doesn't seem like something she would do. Her vote on Alvron still bothers me though. Here is a list of all the players, and what alignment and role they most likely were. I think this can help if people want to go back through specific players posts and see how they interact with known Eliminators(Adavantos and possibly Mailliw), as well as interactions with known villagers. This is basically just my notes of the game. I think you can see why I think the majority of the living Diagrammists are Ghostbloods, since I think all of the dead ones are Villagers. I'm trying to be extra careful when it comes to accusing Ghostbloods though, because I do want to actually win. I wanted to do more in depth stuff about the players I suspect, but I have no idea how to quote from locked threads, which makes it harder to point out specific things someone has said. If anyone could explain how to do that, I'd very much appreciate it! I'm signing off for the night. Talk to you guys tomorrow. Edit: Ninja'd by Elbereth.
  2. TheMightyLopen
    .........Wow. I can't believe you actually were spying on that PM! That is just too good. I'm gonna put my vote on Twei as well for reasons mentioned by Kynedath. I would like to hear from her too though.
  3. TheMightyLopen
    Sure, sure. Obviously it's annoying because it's good advice.
  4. TheMightyLopen
    That's how annoying you are.
  5. TheMightyLopen
    .......Crap. More bad news. I scanned STINK as a SoH Runner as well. Well, now I know PK is telling the truth. At least about this scan. Okay, with this new info, I just realized something. We should have had Bort attack Ada as well as the lynch to insure his demise. I'm really sorry I didn't think of this. I just didn't think that the Diagrammists would actually have lynch protection. Seriously, Wilson? This is tough. So we know that the Diagrammists have: 1 Cook, 1 lynch protective role(Edgedancer or Surgeon), and 1 Elsecaller. I would guess that they have an Edgedancer and that the Edgedancer and Elsecaller are on opposite factions, so that each faction is fairly balanced. I may be putting too much stock into "balance" though, so it's possible they are on the same faction. I'm just thinking with the reasoning that, if the Diagrammists have 2 KR's on one faction, and none on the other, it would be extremely tough for the faction with 2 of their KR's as Diagrammists to complete the "kill the Diagrammists" and "have an equal or higher amount of living KR's left". I think Wilson tried to make it in a way that we might be able to assume things like that. What do you guys think? That is also the same principle I am basing the idea that the Diagrammists have the same number of team mates on each faction. @Bort, did you attack Tony Shark? Or anyone? I'm sad to see Panda go. I was hoping he could become more active. Blast you Ada. Blast you. If the write-up is giving us hints, I would think that points to Panda being an Artifabrian and redirecting Ada's kill from polking to himself. Which would almost assuredly mean Tony Shark is not one, since him and Panda are on the same faction, and with the lack of known Artifabrians, it's unlikely we started with 4. It's also possible that Ada's kill was redirected by a Lightweaver. With Ada's protect, I'd say this all but clears Kynedath, since he was most likely protected by someone who is good, and he was attacked by the Diagrammists. If Wilson gave the Diagrammists 2 protection roles, I'm going to kill myself!!! (No, I will not. But I'll harrumph and whine a good deal.) However, I don't think that's the case. (I really, really hope it's not the case.) I don't know why they would do a WGG right now anyways, but I guess it's that line of thinking that might cause them to want to try it.
  6. TheMightyLopen

    I just got a signed copy of Steelheart!

    1. CarolaDavar

      CarolaDavar

      Awesome, my copy is signed as well

  7. TheMightyLopen
    Oh, whoops. I forgot about Kipper and Creccio. Ada "scanned" them as innocent, but I don't think they've actually been scanned. Kipper(Scholar in contact with Aonar. I would guess Villager just based off of a gut read, though it's not beyond belief that he was a Diagrammist.) Creccio(Supposedly Restares and a Lightweaver. Was trying to get in contact with Ada on the first Cycle through a code. While not exactly perfect reasoning, I'd say most likely Villager.)
  8. TheMightyLopen
    Elkanah, Alvron has been scanned before as well. By me. He came up as a Ghostblood Elsecaller. The players who have not been scanned, as far as I know are: STINK(voted on himself to insure death, Most likely a Villager.), Araris(eliminator killed, which means he's a villager), Honey Badger(I usually call him HB, just for future reference. also eliminator killed. Villager). Phattemer(confirmed good if Ada is the one who actually killed him, which seems likely) and Mailliw(I don't think anyone has scanned him? Ada has given us 2 different results though, first Son of Honour, then revealing he was actually a Diagrammist.). Also, who are you suggesting scans these people? Me or PK? Ada is dying(hopefully), so he can't reveal anything next Cycle. You could join this nice train too you know?
  9. TheMightyLopen
    Awesome. Thanks. I'd rather you kill Tony Shark or something(*cough* Son of Honour *cough*), but whatevs. Maybe people will start accusing active players once most of the inactives are down. That should make things interesting.
  10. TheMightyLopen
    Yay! Twei's back! I understand those problems. Same for me for a little while. Yeah, I really should have just voted on Ada last Cycle. Sorry about that. I was not thinking super clearly when I made my last post of last Cycle. I see. I actually was thinking the same thing in LG15 about myself. Especially with my very first post in that game. As soon as I posted it, I was like, "Uh, is it just me, or does that post just sound like evil!Lopen?" So I get that feeling. I'm still doing research about your posts and such, but I'm slowly coming to believe that you are not a Diagrammist. Any suspicions on your part? Since Ada is getting lynched right now, we can't really vote on anyone(unless you want to do a Cook vote), but it would be a good idea to make some discussion!
  11. TheMightyLopen
    Well, I've been calling players who I thought were Radiants evil trying to somehow hint to my Ghostblood compatriots to take you out, so that's why I specified evil Diagrammists. In my post about you and Creccio. Creccio-Totally EVIL! Elkanah- Maybe EVIL? as opposed to Tony Shark- Diagrammist? Wait, that's supposed to diffuse suspicions against you? Were you purposefully acting like an eliminator for some reason? Why are you even revealing? You aren't even up for the lynch. Thanks for the vote on Ada though.
  12. TheMightyLopen
    Before I get into my suspicions, here is the theory I was talking about earlier. First of all, here are the Diagrammist kills: Diagrammist Kill: Adavantos(Cook) Kill: C1: Venture(SoH) Hellscythe(GB) C2: Haelbarde(GB) Hellscythe(GB) C3: ??? Starri(SoH) C4: HB(GB) Shallan(GB) C5: Araris(GB) ??? C6: ??? DeathClutch(SoH) C7: ??? Phattemer(SoH) Also Ada lynched Alvron(GB). So that makes 6(Hellscythe, Haelbarde, HB, Shallan, Araris, Alvron) Ghostbloods to 4(Sart, Starri, DC, Phattemer) Sons of Honour. My theory is that the Diagrammists are trying to force us into a faction war by killing mostly one faction. I started forming this theory about 2 Cycles ago, when Araris was killed, and the numbers were 6 Ghostbloods to 2 SoH players. Now Ada has killed 2 SoH players, so I'm less sure this is the case. Both the kill on DC and Phatt make sense though. DC was probably the most cleared and most dangerous player if he came back from inactivity(not sure why he even left). Phatt had just claimed Explorer, and it would be nice for the Diagrammmists to take out the protective roles. Also, Explorer is not a Knight Radiant, so by killing Phat, he didn't really help us Ghostbloods any. So there it is. Maybe that's not the case here, but it's what I've been thinking about lately. It correlates with my suspicions, because I think they're trying to protect their Ghostblood Diagrammists, since Ghostbloods will be more likely to play the faction aspect game if they're pressured because of low numbers. I do think the Diagrammists had 3 on each faction, and I also believe that Mailliw was evil. So, with Ada being evil as well, that would mean that there is 1 SoH Diagrammist(my suspicion is Tony Shark) left, and 3 Ghostblood Diagrammists(my suspicions are Elbereth, Ripple and Feligon) left. I think that's a lot of conclusion jumping though, so I'm wondering what everyone else thinks. Currently, with the way the game has played out, I don't think us Ghostbloods have a very good shot at winning, which is why I've been trying to kill a couple SoH KR's before I solely focused on going after Diagrammists. I was going after Diagrammists during that time(except for Creccio, I'll admit that was almost solely faction based), but only my suspicions that were SoH as well. The reason for my vote on Elkanah last Cycle was because I think he might be a KR. I believe us Ghostbloods have lost at least 2(Alvron, Mace Wind) Knight Radiants, and the SoH have only lost 1(Creccio). It's possible that the GB's have lost more than that though, since we don't know a couple of our deaths roles. We know of almost all of the SoH roles though, and if DC isn't a KR, that means we've only killed 1 SoH KR. It might be a mistake saying all of this in the thread, but I want to focus on Diagrammists right now, since I don't think we're doing so hot in that area. I'll just reveal who I think might be SoH KR to balance me revealing, or at least bringing into focus, that us GB's are at a disadvantage. Elkanah(I'm pretty sure he's a Radiant. He hinted at his role pretty blatantly earlier.) Tony Shark(Elsecaller. He was very active in the early Cycles, when we know of Diagrammist Elsecalling happening. Not much evidence though. Just a gut feel.) Kynedath(Has been active, something I would think that a role as important as KR would be. They would not very much want to survive, so they would need to stay fairly active, and not be suspicious. That pretty much goes for every player, but I think the feeling of wanting to survive would be even larger for Radiants, seeing as their survival is part of their win condition.) Burnt/Aonar/Panda/DeathClutch?(I really don't have any clues at all for the fourth one. My gut would be Burnt is one, since Aonar expressed some difficulty "getting into" the game, something that doesn't seem like it would happen if you had one of the most crucial roles. Panda has been really inactive, which would be really hurtful to his team if he was killed because of inactivity. DeathClutch was inactive as well.) @Bort (or whoever the last Cook is. I'm not sure how Kynedath knows Bort is a Cook), my "recommended instructions" to you would be to attack Tony Shark(anyone want to start doing Cook votes?) this Cycle. If he survives, it's likely he's an Elsecaller, since Phatt was most likely an Explorer, and we have not heard of more than 1 Explorer being on either team. Well, it's really late, but I'm still going to try to go more in depth on my suspicions. I'm just gonna post this now, and edit in the rest. (I have almost deleted really long posts like this before while I'm going to different pages, and that would be really really sad. ) I may not finish tonight, but since I do think we should lynch Ada this Cycle, I hope you guys won't care too much if I don't go into everything right now. I do want to say right now though, that I agree with Aonar that lynching polking will do practically nothing for us. Elbereth even said in one of her earlier posts that we could just use the Cooks to take out inactives, so her vote on polking these last 2 Cycles is part of the reason I'm suspicious of her. Elbereth, why not advocate that Bort kill polking rather than us wasting a full Cycle lynching an inactive? (We could even ask Ada too. Who knows? He's supposedly a "nice guy." ) @Ada, will you poison polking? He's so inactive. You don't like inactivity right? Plus you could make up for killing a potentially active player(Phattemer, who just said he was gonna start participating more....kinda.). Sounds like a good deal to me.
  13. TheMightyLopen
    No comment. Oh.....wait. If the GM's gave you 8 players, a Cook, an Elsecaller, and an Edgedancer, I would.....not be happy. Adavantos I just don't think we need him around any more. It would be nice to have a sizable gap on this lynch. I'll be going through posts made by my suspicions, and posts made about my suspicions now, and will attempt to explain why I think they're evil Diagrammists.
  14. TheMightyLopen
    Okay, it's a bit late, sew I'm not going to be able to put all of my thoughts down tonight. For starters, I scanned Haelbarde as: Ghostblood Assassin. As for the tied lynch last Cycle, honestly, it makes me even more suspicious of Tony Shark. A tie between 2 Diagrammists would suit them just fine. I'll just list my suspicions now in order from most suspicious to least suspicious. 1. Tony Shark(kind of a part of Hellscythe's lynch, but kinda not. Was called out by Hellscythe. Has been very inactive since then. He explained his inactivity a bit, but it has been a long time since he's posted. He has been online, even as recently as about 10 hours ago.) 2. Ripple(involved in Alv's lynch, gut read as Diagrammist. Looking back through her posts, I get the feeling she's evil. I'll try to explain more later.) 3. Feligon(is suspicious to me. He was voted on by Ada once, but that was when Stink was up for the lynch. I think that Ada was trying to tie the lynch there, because Ada and Feligon were in contact with him, and could learn valuable info from him if he was kept alive. Also, somewhat of a bad gut feeling towards him.) 4. Elbereth(lots of posts. Too many for me to do detailed analysis right now, but looking back through her posts, I could very easily see her being a Diagrammist) 5. polking(inactive. Hasn't posted, but hasn't been taken out by Ada. I'm not really suspicious of him though. I think Ada is leaving an obvious inactive alive so we'll waste our time, and lynch.) 6. Aonar(fairly inactive. Not much reason to suspect him. Not much reason to trust him either.) 7. Twei(Orlok voiced suspicion of her(her is correct, right?), and she has been very quiet.) 8. Seonid(Hmmm, tough to read. I'm leaning towards good, but I'm keeping a healthy dose of paranoia about him.) 9. Burnt(you just had to list me at the top of your list didn't you? I'm kidding. As much as it pains me to say, my gut feeling for you is village. Which means she's probably evil. ) 10. Panda(inactive.) 11. Elkanah(hmmmmmmmmmmm. A bit of a complicated situation here. I may explain later, but maybe not. It has to do with his role.) 12. Kynedath(Actually consistently active. His tone and posts sound good to me. I'm still not convinced he's good, but I'm leaning fairly far towards that.) 13. Clanky(Protected Venture. Other than that, I haven't looked over his posts recently, but I don't remember anything strange except his vote on Alvron.) 14. Venture(inactiveish? Was Diagrammist attacked on Cycle 1. I'd say most likely good.) 15. Bort(if he's a Cook, and if he's the one who attacked both Mailliw and Adavantos, I'd say he's most likely village. It might have been Starri who attacked both Mail and Ada. I think it was Bort though. I also don't think our GM's would allow the Diagrammists to have 2 Cooks and an Elsecaller. That's overpowered no matter how you look at it. Maybe if they only started with like, 4 players or something, but I don't think that's the case, which leads me to believe Bort is good. I'm hesitant to rely strictly on role stuff for players alignment, but in this case, it really does seem to point to him being village.) 16. Lopen(Wow. What a great guy. That's all I have to say. I wouldn't mind if someone else did some analysis on this dude though.) 17. Adavantos(Whoops, he's supposed to be at the top. I could just not list him, but I want everyone to be aware of player numbers.) Now, something I've been thinking about. Since this game is very, evenly distributed, I'm wondering if that applies to how many Diagrammists are on each faction. For example, it's possible that their is 3 on each side. We know that Ada is a Diagrammist, and I do believe Mail was as well, which makes 2 on the SoH side. With the direction of the majority of the Diagrammist, plus Ada's Cook, kills, I'm beginning to wonder about something. I may go into more detail on this tomorrow. It's just a theory, but I'm thinking it may be the case. As you will see later, my suspicions line up with my theory. It shouldn't be too hard to figure out what I'm talking about, but I want you guys to think about this. I do believe the Diagrammists started out with 6 players, like Ada said in one of the early Cycles. Since we know of 2(probably), I'd say we have 4 more to go. So adding Ada to that number, I think we're at 12:5 right now. I would be fine with lynching Ada now. He's given us all the info we need I think. It might be nice to get Stink's alignment, but I don't think it's necessary. Something to point out that should be discussed. The lack of a Diagrammmist kill these last 2 Cycles. I'm not sure what to make of it yet. @Ada, did you poison Phatt? @Bort, did you poison Phatt? I just want the information to be out there. Anyone else have any suspicions? I think we have a good amount of info to work with, and if we discuss and really focus, we can do this. Edit: retracted vote(yay! I remembered!)
  15. TheMightyLopen
    @Elkanah, sorry, but the explanation will have to wait. I've explained my reasons in a PM, so if I die, they can reveal if they want to. About Ada's post. It's confirmed that all of his teammates are female. @Bort, Why? For what reason didst thou do such a thing? Mind explaining please? Also, I would be happy if you could take out suspicious SoH players. I'm a bit wary of Tony Shark and Aonar myself. Phatt as well, as he could be an Elsecaller, rather than an Explorer. @Elbereth, I firmly believe alv was innocent. Ada lynched him. My scan of him was GB. It seems pretty clear to me. I actually wouldn't mind lynching Ada right now. We're getting low on numbers, and I don't know that the info he's giving us is worth it. It might be, so I guess I see your point and will help out. polking Edit: Actually, I don't know if I want polking to die(GB, you know?). Tony Shark, I would be okay with.
  16. TheMightyLopen
    Yeah, as Mail and Mark mentioned, I've been feeling unwell lately, and have had limited internet access. Things have been busy with family as well, but I think everything is settling down and will be back to normal soon. I've skimmed over the thread, but I don't have a whole lot to say yet. I don't think I agree with lynching the Capta.....I mean, Wyrm. >> I rather like PM's, and I think they can be a good tool for the village. I'm not saying we should keep him alive strictly for his role, but I don't think there's enough evidence against him to warrant offing him(and a fairly useful ability imo). Venture, what do I think about what? (insert Alvron troll here about random things ) Haelbarde, I'll get back with you on what I think about the roles. Luckats advice about them during the Night Turn seemed sound to me, but I haven't had the chance to really think over them for myself too much. I'm hoping to be more available tomorrow. If anyone would like to PM me, that would be great. I always like having a bunch of PM's!
  17. TheMightyLopen
    So it seems Creccio was indeed a Lightweaver. Whether he was a Diagrammist or not remains to be seen. DeathClutch confirmed innocent. I'm not sure how Zas was killed by a Cook. Supposedly the last Cook is a Ghostblood, so I'm confused as to why they would target Zas. It's possible that Zas targeted Creccio again to try and make sure he actually died, and Creccio redirected his kill back to himself, but I don't think that's likely. I scanned Mace Windu as: Ghostblood Bondsmith. I'm really worried that this is the correct scan and so we do not have that win condition available to us anymore. Just to be sure, I would like to ask that the Bondsmith uses Adhesion to bond 2 players votes together this Cycle. That way we can have complete confirmation about that win condition being lost to us, and can go ahead with the game aware that we must either kill the remaining unknown Diagrammists to win, or we have no chance of victory. We know the Bondsmith is/was not on the Diagrammist team, so they should be able to comply with this request. Phat, I'm glad to have you back with us. (I haven't been pushing for you to get poisoned at all! Nope. ) Factions have already been revealed by Creccio(Restares), and basically confirmed by everyone else, since no one pointed out mistakes. Also, Orlok(Thaidakar), revealed himself, but did not disprove the list. @Feligon, could you please explain why you did not reveal my scan results last Cycle? @Adavantos, So, Mailliw's alignment? I'm going to put my vote on Elkanah for now. I'll give reasons in a bit. Something I think I should bring attention to is that I forgot to green out my original vote last Cycle, so my vote was on Phattemer. I forgot to do it, but no one reminded me about it. I'm not faulting you guys at all. It was my own silly fault, but I think it would be good for us to have a vote tally every once in a while to make sure mistakes like that are avoided in future Cycles, when the votes are closer.
  18. TheMightyLopen
    Reveal time. I'm a Scholar. Here's my scans: C2- Arraenae(SoH Surgeon) C3- Hellscythe(GB Explorer) C4- Alvron(GB Elsecaller) C5- Shallan(GB Runner) I'm a bit upset at Feligon for not revealing this, since he just made a PM with me this Cycle, and I asked him to reveal it, but now I feel like it's important enough that I should come out with it. I'd appreciate protection if it's still available. Probably not a good idea to wait until right now to reveal, but I thought Feligon was going to give my scans out to you all. Since we know Sart's alignment was messed with on C2, Arraenae's scan is practically confirmed. As far as the others go, I'm not sure, but I believe they may be correct as well. Shallans lines up with what Seonid was saying, and Hellscythe's lines up as well. Alvron's is the one I'm least sure about. I hope everyone can use this information to put things together a little better. I almost revealed a few times this Cycle, but since the general consensus was to keep Ada alive for a little while longer, I wasn't sure if it was necessary, since Feligon had contacted me. Seeing as how Feligon has responded multiple times in my PM with him, and has even posted once since we started talking, his not revealing my results raises red flags for me. That, coupled with his lurking in the thread, makes me highly suspicious of him. And since I've now revealed my role in thread, him being my contact no longer protects him. Also, something that's bothering me, is that he contacted me, and not Orlok. I specifically asked him to contact Orlok, but instead he decided on me. Theory time: Possibly because Creccio knew that a Cook was targeting him(possible, since Zas said he targeted Creccio 2 cycles in a row, meaning that Creccio would have redirected the first one, and been aware that he had another chance to kill again if the Cook decided to go after him again), and that they conferred in their doc, and Feligon was aware that Orlok was likely to die by Creccio's redirect of Zas' kill, therefore he didn't want to waste a chance to gather more info with his PM ability. Not exactly a slam dunk against Feligon, as I was much more vocal in thread, and he may have decided to PM an active posting player, rather than a quieter player like Orlok, but still, it doesn't make me trust Feligon any. @Feligon, why didn't you reveal my results? @Clanky, why do you think polking is your best bet for an eliminator? He has never posted in thread, something I highly doubt Ada would be okay with. He hasn't even been online in about a week. If we're taking out inactives with our Cooks, Phattemer, Aonar, and Lightsworn Panda are much better targets if you ask me. Especially Phat and Aonar. Panda has previously stated being behind on things, which could be a lie I guess(thought I'm inclined to believe him), but at least he's given some reason for his inactivity. Phatt and Aonar haven't contributed much at all so far, and have not explained themselves. Aonar stated he had trouble 'getting into the game,' or something like that, so that could be seen as a reason for his lack of contribution I suppose. As for Ghostblood players. Please be active! Ada can't kill you if you are ACTIVE!!! (SoH players, I think it's best if you guys stay low for now. ) All jokes aside, Ada has said that he will kill inactives. Maybe if everyone becomes active, he'll not have any targets! (assuming he'll stop killing, that is! )
  19. TheMightyLopen
    Soooooooo........I might not be able to post my thoughts on every player right now. I'm going to try to post my thoughts on all of the SoH players though. A lot of it is just how I feel about players at this point. That's it for now. I might be able to do some analysis on GB players tomorrow, as well as a little more in depth analysis on others', but since it is Christmas, I'm not going to force myself. Goodnight all! (Btw, Merry Christmas everyone! )
  20. TheMightyLopen
    Darn. I was hoping we could just ask you to reveal the next Cycle by voting next Cycle. We have to vote this Cycle for next Cycle's results? If so, I'll go with Mailliw I think. There was quite a few interactions with him in the early part of the game with players that are still living that may give us clues. We basically have 3 options who I think would give us the most info: Stink, Mailliw and Kipper. Since Stink helped kill himself, it makes me inclined to believe he is innocent(or at least, not a Diagrammist ). Kipper was a Scholar, but that doesn't necessarily mean he was a good guy. Mailliw was vocal, and almost lynched the Cycle that Ada turned the lynch to Alv. Not necessarily because Mail was evil, but I think it warrants getting his alignment from Ada. As for Stink and Kipper, well, PK can scan one of those 2. Either one is fine with me, as I think we can learn different things from each. What about everyone else? Any opinion about who we should scan, and get confirmed by Ada?
  21. TheMightyLopen
    Creccio. Phattemer. Reasoning? Scroll up. Sorry to do this, but I'm gonna have to postpone my suspicions/trusts/paranoid thoughts post at the moment in favor of sleep. I fingers crossed promise to post it tomorrow. I'm gonna try to do a post about each living player if I can. With the limited info, it might not be too in depth, but with Ada's reveal, it does shine a little bit of light on things I think. I encourage everyone else to post their thoughts about what Ada's reveal could mean as well. Hopefully we can use this info to pull out a victory........ for Ghostbloods. One thing I was thinking about with Ada's alignment in mind is Venture. I personally think he is innocent and that Ada pushed for his death because of his habitual inactivity, because that seems like something Ada would do. Assuming that, it does seem that Clanky might be innocent as well for protecting Venture(assuming he's telling the truth about things, which is likely I think). It could also be said that the attack on Venture was a WGG and maybe Ada was trying to get Venture more involved or something, and that Clanky is the one who protected Ada on the 2nd Cycle, therefore Venture and Clanky are evil too. But I'm leaning towards the first scenario as being true. Edit: spacing
  22. TheMightyLopen
    Well, I was referring to Ada's post last Cycle where he said he was going to kill Feligon because of inactivity and him being a GB. Twas only a joke though. As for keeping Ada around, we will kill him eventually. It's not like we're going to wait that long. Not only is he another kill for the Diagrammists, but he's a pretty smart guy, so by killing him, we would hamper the Diagrammists ability to discuss strategies and stuff. If we keep him alive for a little longer, we can get confirmation about some players if we want. We would be losing 2 innocents each Cycle(unless they get protected), but we would know that at least 1 of them is inactive, so it wouldn't be a terrible loss I don't think. I actually was saying DC was not suspicious because Ada almost got him lynched last Cycle, if it hadn't been for the Ardent that moved a vote to Feligon. Here's the last online times for DC, Phattemer and polking. DC- about 4 days ago. Phatt- about 4 hours ago. polking- about 5 days ago. So Phattemer is the one who is the most suspicious to me out of those 3, since he has been on, but has not participated. At least, not that we know of.
  23. TheMightyLopen
    But last Cycle you said you'd accept votes for your kill. *Gasp* Does that mean you were lying? While I agree polking is inactive, he doesn't seem to be the best choice. Maybe Phattemer or DeathClutch, since they seem to be lurking a bit. I'll go with Phattemer, since Ada almost killed DeathClutch last Cycle. I don't think that clears DeathClutch completely, but I'm inclined to think DC is innocent because of that. Anything else seems convoluted and unnecessary. I'm gonna try to get a post up with my suspicions/trusts/thoughts in a few hours, when I have the time to go over Ada's posts and interactions. I might possibly change my vote then, as part of the reason we haven't had lynch discussion is because we've been talking about inactives so much.
  24. TheMightyLopen
    Well, I'm on mobile right now, so I'll look over Adas posts later and post more then. All I have to say right now is, silly Ada, feeling sorry for your enemies. I'm not sure whether we should kill him or not. I think we probably should. Thinking back on things, his reveal does basically clear a few of the dead such as his Cook targets, and Alvron(I thought there was at least 1 Diagrammist involved in his lynch). Edit: ninja'd Can we choose which inactives you kill, Ada?
  25. TheMightyLopen
    Sign me up!
×
×
  • Create New...