ShardShaper he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 BRANDON SANDERSON IS BEING SUED FOR MASS MURDER BY KALADIN, HARMONY, AND THE KOLOSS WERE PEOPLE TOO FOUNDATION!!! DEFEND HIM, OR CONDEMN HIM Welcome to the court of the cosmere, with Adonalism presiding. Brandon sanderson is being tried for character brutalization, with the suggested sentence of having to let us all read Stormlight Four drafts. *The offence takes the stand* [Kaladin] Tukks. Dead. Nelda. Dead. Goshel. Dead. Dallet: Dead. Cenn, Maps, Dunny: All Dead. Moash-Living... STORMS, WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO KILL THAT SON OF A KOLOSS!!! [Representative of the "koloss were people too foundation"] Over TEN BILLION KOLOSS were brutalized and killed during the fall of the final empire, as there minds were hijacked and there bodys used as weapons. [Harmony] Brandon Sanderson has killed to many characters. He must be tried for his crimes. Witnesses, as readers of these books you have a firsthand knowledge of Brandon Sanderson's character brutalization. You may now speak. 5
Weltall Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 Ham: This is a very interesting philosophical question you pose. Have you given serious thought to all the implications of putting one's own creator on trial? I have some musings I'd like to share if you have two or three hours... 8
ShardShaper he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Author Posted April 24, 2019 (edited) [Harmony] Hammond, we all love your philosophy debates, but this man killed Clubs. And Kelsier. AND Vin. [Random Sharder] I want to hear! [Adonalism] You are banned from the courtroom! Edited April 24, 2019 by ShardShaper
HSuperLee Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 I feel as though this suggestion is rather like putting time on trial for the deaths of every person who has died of old age. 2
ShardShaper he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Author Posted April 24, 2019 (edited) Time has no choice. Would it kill sanderson to let Kaladin be happy for ten minutes? Also, he didn't need to kill all the koloss. They were people too. Edited April 24, 2019 by ShardShaper
Nathrangking he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 Moash lives for this Brandon must suffer. The prosecution calls Parlin to the stand.
old man moomba he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 The defence would like to point out that all deaths were considered necessary by Mr. Sanderson. 1
ShardShaper he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Author Posted April 24, 2019 Does any murderer consider his victims deaths unnecessary?
old man moomba he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, ShardShaper said: Does any murderer consider his victims deaths unnecessary? Irrelevant. Mr. Sanderson created these characters; they are his to do with as he sees fit, regardless of the opinion of your clients. 1
Nathrangking he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 The court took your statement of irrelevance as being an objection.
old man moomba he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 I was just pointing out the fact that Mr. Sanderson is not a murderer. Just because you think the deaths were unjustified does not mean that they were. Your opinion is not fact.
ShardShaper he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Author Posted April 24, 2019 He is here on charges of character brutalization though, not murder. 30 minutes ago, Dr. Dapper said: Mr. Sanderson created these characters; they are his to do with as he sees fit, regardless of the opinion of your clients. So can a parent kill his children if they wish?
HSuperLee Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, ShardShaper said: He is here on charges of character brutalization though, not murder. So can a parent kill his children if they wish? Is a child a creation of their parents or a consequence of their actions? I would argue the latter. Parents do not get to decide the appearance, beliefs, actions or thoughts of their child. Mr. Sanderson controls all those in regards to his characters. If anything, the comparison between parent and child is extremely lacking in this regard. Mr. Sanderson's characters would be better understood as extensions of his own existence than existing entities of their own. 1
Wandering Investor Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 (edited) Listen guys, we can't hold the artist responsible for the brutalization of some of the artwork(so long as said artwork is not alive, or at least not aware/sentient) in the scheme of the greater art! Their sacrifice is necessary for the story to succeed, as light is defined by darkness, so too does their pain give way to beauty.... *reads what the sentence for the crime is........* Mr. Sanderson must be held fully accountable for his crimes, and his sentence carried out post haste!! Edited April 24, 2019 by Wandering Investor Added sentience exclusion to artwork brutalization.. 1
Karger he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 Um? Isn't this kind of like putting God on trail? Sanderson does the best he can.
HSuperLee Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Karger said: Um? Isn't this kind of like putting God on trail? Sanderson does the best he can. I mean, that is the premise of the movie "God of Trial" which is rather good.
Bigmikey357 he/him Posted April 24, 2019 Posted April 24, 2019 In brutality he brutalizes himself, as his art is an extension of his own will and imagination. As well put someone on trial for suicide.
ShardGuard he/him Posted April 25, 2019 Posted April 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Karger said: Um? Isn't this kind of like putting God on trail? Sanderson does the best he can. [David] Agreed! This is like slicing a potato with an apple slicer! 1
ShardShaper he/him Posted April 25, 2019 Author Posted April 25, 2019 [Kaladin] OBJECTION! David is not a cosmere character, and can not testify in cosmere court. 1
Nathrangking he/him Posted April 25, 2019 Posted April 25, 2019 15 minutes ago, ShardShaper said: [Kaladin] OBJECTION! David is not a cosmere character, and can not testify in cosmere court. [Adonalsium] Objection Sustained. Call your next witness.
HSuperLee Posted April 25, 2019 Posted April 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Nathrangking said: [Adonalsium] Objection Sustained. Call your next witness. Objection! Based on the ruling by Adonalsium that a non-cosmere character can not be a witness for this trial, Brandon Sanderson cannot be tried for crimes within the Cosmere, as he is not a Cosmere character. Therefore this must be declared a mistrial. 4
ShardShaper he/him Posted April 25, 2019 Author Posted April 25, 2019 OBJECTION! Sanderson is not a witness. 1
HSuperLee Posted April 25, 2019 Posted April 25, 2019 Just now, ShardShaper said: OBJECTION! Sanderson is not a witness. And yet, he has a right to a trial by his peers. If a non-cosmere character cannot be considered a peer so as to stand witness, how can you argue that any of this trial qualifies as such to him?
Recommended Posts