Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
49 minutes ago, Condensation said:

I read more than you do!

obviously not, the average chasmgoat reads 800 books simultaneously in the time it takes a condensation to read 1.5f7c967257fe3_itstrue.png.ac6d69020172a91ca6817881121be360.png

Posted
Just now, Chasmgoat said:

obviously not, the average chasmgoat reads 800 books simultaneously in the time it takes a condensation to read 1.5f7c967257fe3_itstrue.png.ac6d69020172a91ca6817881121be360.png

Very funny, but I doubt that you can read 800 books(even short ones) in the time it takes me to read 1 book(even the encyclopedia).

Posted
4 minutes ago, Chasmgoat said:

obviously not, the average chasmgoat reads 800 books simultaneously in the time it takes a condensation to read 1.5f7c967257fe3_itstrue.png.ac6d69020172a91ca6817881121be360.png

I think that you just used inspect.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Condensation said:

Very funny, but I doubt that you can read 800 books(even short ones) in the time it takes me to read 1 book(even the encyclopedia).

I have one-page books. Bet I could read 800 of those faster then you reading an encyclopedia. Probably. 

Posted

No, you obviously searched 'define obviously', and then you put 'Can Chasmgoat read 800 book in the time it takes condensation to read 1' in the search field.

No, I don't think so, Experience. Especially if I could skim.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Shard of Reading said:

Hmm... I think... Gooses.

Geese, to be sure. Goosen, possibly. But I don't think I've seen any gooses around for over ten years. They might be extinct, actually.

Posted
2 minutes ago, FriarFritz said:

Geese, to be sure. Goosen, possibly. But I don't think I've seen any gooses around for over ten years. They might be extinct, actually.

It was more I think that was the third post.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Condensation said:

No, you obviously searched 'define obviously'

Actually, it was "definition obviously"

Posted
Just now, Condensation said:

Yay!

Yes, I spread the yay.

I spread yay too. YAY FOR THE YAY!!!

Posted
1 minute ago, Condensation said:

Yay is yay, for the yay is yayest.

That was proper grammatically? (This probably wasn’t but nvm)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...