Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Delightful said:

I would be delighted to storm it!

*starts blowing really hard*

well, cousin adopted as step-brother. The family does get confusing. 

Yes. Yes it does. It's hard to keep track of all the whippersnappers-especially the clones.

Edited by DelightfuI
Posted
2 minutes ago, DelightfuI said:

My first reaction: wait, I posted? Is someone hacking me? Other than @Daniyah, of course. I know you're there.

:ph34r:

Posted
2 minutes ago, Delightful said:

Daniyah is hacking or just lurking suspiciously in dark alleys?

Likely both, actually.

hrrrmmm...

:P

Posted
1 minute ago, Delightful said:

Daniyah is hacking or just lurking suspiciously in dark alleys?

I lurk. I'm always lurking. It was there in my introduction post too :ph34r:

Posted
Just now, Daniyah said:

I lurk. I'm always lurking. It was there in my introduction post too :ph34r:

The conspiracy goes back so far...

Posted

So there are two Delightfuls now, huh? Good thing the original has so much rep, that she's easy to recognize :P

Posted (edited)

Wait which one is the real Delightful? Worldhopper or Sentinet Awakened Object?

edit: Nevermind, I figured it out. Worldhopper is the real one. B) you're welcome everyone 

Edited by I_am_a_Stick
Posted

Remember when I said I was doing a Skateboard deck with an augmented Bridge 4 symbol on it?

I finally got around to taking a photo of the draft, I've finished the actual skateboard, but it's going to the Exhibition, so I can't take any photos of it till then.

Spoiler

IMG_2103.JPGIMG_2102.JPG

IMG_2100.JPG

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, Iron Eyes said:

Linguistics, the greatest superpower.


unnamed_zps9i3ksjx3.jpg

tumblr_oauwe9M2wV1sp1wslo1_500.jpg

Edited by Quiver
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Delightful said:

You were right about that. :ph34r: 

What annoys me the most about Boomers and Gen-Xers discussing Millennials' flaws is that they'll blame Millennials for everything, even when it doesn't make sense. One day, they'll complain about how Millennials are lazy and entitled and rarely pull their fair share in the workplace; the next, they'll complain about how they're "work martyrs" and are creating an environment where people are afraid to use their paid vacation days. Those are two diametrically opposed complaints, but Boomers and Gen-Xers will use them both without batting an eye. 

Edited by TwiLyghtSansSparkles
Posted
Just now, TwiLyghtSansSparkles said:

You were right about that. :ph34r: 

What annoys me the most about Boomers and Gen-Xers discussing Millennials' flaws is that everything is a flaw. One day, they'll complain about how Millennials are lazy and entitled and rarely pull their fair share in the workplace; the next, they'll complain about how they're "work martyrs" and are creating an environment where people are afraid to use their paid vacation days. Those are two diametrically opposed complaints, but Boomers and Gen-Xers will use them both without batting an eye. 

Solution: stop caring what people think and pray this won't have a tangible effect on your life? :l 

 

who'm I kidding. Grumpy opinion piece writers have jobs and influence and stuff and can afford to dump all their insecurities on us instead of dealing with their own problems. 

 

I felt so validated today. A major pet peeve of mine is when older people are all "we played by ourselves till it got dark and we made up our own games and played with dangerous things and no one ever got hurt but all you whilpersnappers can do is sit inside and play video games". 

Maybe that's because we're never allowed outside unsupervised and why are you blaming children for what's out of their control?!

so I found this article about these people who conducted research and basically concluded that it's deemed morally wrong to leave children by themselves therefore everyone thinks it's super dangerous and in some cases criminalised, therefore parents are judged for leaving their kids alone probably by the same people who complain about how kids today are addicted to technology

my pet peeve now has science and articulate writing to back it up! So there old grumpy complaining people!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Delightful said:

Solution: stop caring what people think and pray this won't have a tangible effect on your life? :l 

 

who'm I kidding. Grumpy opinion piece writers have jobs and influence and stuff and can afford to dump all their insecurities on us instead of dealing with their own problems. 

 

I felt so validated today. A major pet peeve of mine is when older people are all "we played by ourselves till it got dark and we made up our own games and played with dangerous things and no one ever got hurt but all you whilpersnappers can do is sit inside and play video games". 

Maybe that's because we're never allowed outside unsupervised and why are you blaming children for what's out of their control?!

so I found this article about these people who conducted research and basically concluded that it's deemed morally wrong to leave children by themselves therefore everyone thinks it's super dangerous and in some cases criminalised, therefore parents are judged for leaving their kids alone probably by the same people who complain about how kids today are addicted to technology

my pet peeve now has science and articulate writing to back it up! So there old grumpy complaining people!

It is an interesting article, but it is not "science" until there is consensus ;)

Which leads to a point: you don't need science to have a convincing argument. 

Edited by Orlion Determined
Adding quotes because the article is part of the scientific process
Posted
7 minutes ago, Orlion Determined said:

It is an interesting article, but it is not "science" until there is consensus ;)

Which leads to a point: you don't need science to have a convincing argument. 

No, but an irritating number of people won't accept an argument, no matter how convincing, unless it cites at least one official-sounding study from a publication they trust. 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, TwiLyghtSansSparkles said:

No, but an irritating number of people won't accept an argument, no matter how convincing, unless it cites at least one official-sounding study from a publication they trust. 

So, quick, Delightful! Kidnap some publishers! 

:P

Edited by DelightfuI
Posted
2 minutes ago, Delightful said:

We can lure them in with the promise of cookies!

Well, they'd have to be heavily spiked cookies to affect such high-minded, intelligent-

*turns and laughs rather loudly*

-people.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...