Ascended Grubberfly He/Him Posted Thursday at 06:05 PM Posted Thursday at 06:05 PM 16 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said: Why not? Why waste a key as an elim? It doesn’t benefit them at all if I get exed for TUC to die the next round. I say this scenario only makes sense with v!TUC. And TJ, I voted Hoid on a suspicion, then poked Coder when I had no suspicions. I wanted more information. I  assumed Coder was busy because he wasn’t active and I wanted to do something instead of wait for a response.
The Unknown Character he/him Posted Thursday at 06:11 PM Posted Thursday at 06:11 PM @|TJ|, @Ascended Grubberfly, I would be willing to switch to Mint.
Ascended Grubberfly He/Him Posted Thursday at 06:14 PM Posted Thursday at 06:14 PM 2 minutes ago, The Unknown Character said: @|TJ|, @Ascended Grubberfly, I would be willing to switch to Mint. Are you suggesting they didn't protect Hoid?
The Unknown Character he/him Posted Thursday at 06:17 PM Posted Thursday at 06:17 PM 1 minute ago, Ascended Grubberfly said: Are you suggesting they didn't protect Hoid? Tbh, I know I'm not an elim, so anyone who's not me or Hoid is a better exe. There's multiple worlds where Mint is e. They could be protecting you, gambitting by not submitting the kill, or something else that I don't know. Actually, Mint
Hoid Slayer He/Him Posted Thursday at 06:27 PM Posted Thursday at 06:27 PM 20 minutes ago, Ascended Grubberfly said: Why waste a key as an elim? It doesn’t benefit them at all if I get exed for TUC to die the next round. I say this scenario only makes sense with v!TUC. Alright I literally went over this Okay I don’t love the direction all this is going in But I am willing to concede good points being made by TJ I’m willing to help set up a tie between TUC and Mint, and see then whether any vote manip or hammering comes in to reveal an elim preference I am not willing to entirely abandon the TUC train this quickly Another pro to exeing TUC: It serves to soft clear a lot of people for their passiveness to a C1 TUC train @Archer VC please
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted Thursday at 06:50 PM Posted Thursday at 06:50 PM 21 hours ago, Mint11 said: yeah good points @Ascended Grubberfly @Stardust@Through the Living Hopper would any of you be willing to vote on TUC? I'm worried about elims manipulating votes with the VC so close Yes, sorry, I've been busy. TUO
The Unknown Character he/him Posted Thursday at 06:50 PM Posted Thursday at 06:50 PM My activity will be very spotty in the last three hours before rollover, so if we're going to do this we need to do it soon
|TJ| he/him Posted Thursday at 06:52 PM Posted Thursday at 06:52 PM 9 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said: It serves to soft clear a lot of people for their passiveness to a C1 TUC train Bro, there is no use of clearing people anymore. Best case scenario, it's 6-2 now, and it could very well be 5-3. If there is an ML and they get off a kill, it would be 4-2 (3-3) and Enmity = 3. Let us assume the aim would be to lie that they would be providing Favor, so they also get a second rebuke next cycle (an extra kill). If they have enough vote manip, then they win even without a majority, which is why we should treat this cycle as lylo. @Through the Living Hopper, you should see the above argument for e!Grub/e!Mint/v!TUC 2 minutes ago, The Unknown Character said: My activity will be very spotty in the last three hours before rollover, so if we're going to do this we need to do it soon same actually.
Hoid Slayer He/Him Posted Thursday at 06:55 PM Posted Thursday at 06:55 PM 1 minute ago, |TJ| said: Bro, there is no use of clearing people anymore. Best case scenario, it's 6-2 now, and it could very well be 5-3. If there is an ML and they get off a kill, it would be 4-2 (3-3) and Enmity = 3. Let us assume the aim would be to lie that they would be providing Favor, so they also get a second rebuke next cycle (an extra kill). If they have enough vote manip, then they win even without a majority, which is why we should treat this cycle as lylo. @Through the Living Hopper, you should see the above argument for e!Grub/e!Mint/v!TUC Snap you’re right Tragically, I don’t have the time from here to rollover to do an analysis And I want TUC to die @The Unknown Character, if you’d like to defend yourself, could you describe in as much detail as possible without exact quotes your PM with Coder? If anyone else was PMed with Coder, please describe your PMs as well, optimally after TUC has made his statement
The Unknown Character he/him Posted Thursday at 06:57 PM Posted Thursday at 06:57 PM 1 minute ago, Hoid Slayer said: Snap you’re right Tragically, I don’t have the time from here to rollover to do an analysis And I want TUC to die @The Unknown Character, if you’d like to defend yourself, could you describe in as much detail as possible without exact quotes your PM with Coder? If anyone else was PMed with Coder, please describe your PMs as well, optimally after TUC has made his statement I'll try, but I'm pretty busy right now. Will be working on it when I can
|TJ| he/him Posted Thursday at 07:11 PM Posted Thursday at 07:11 PM Posting Illwei's explanation of the situation - Quote Coder in his opening PM to me mentioned that he had heard I was a returning player. This was before he popped into thread the first time, probably very shortly before he did he sent me the PM. I asked him where he heard that, because immediately I had a hard time imagining myself come up in conversation in a PM, He had not been in thread to see TUC's post about everyone, and even if I did come up in conversation...he didn't seem very...conversational? it had to have been a direct ask. I then asked him about it, and he said that it had come up in conversation with TUC, as he had PMs with TUC and Hoid. I had also said something else in the PM unrelated and he didn't respond to that part. Then when I asked TUO, who responded in thread without prompting (to his merit), he, well, I mean you can see the responses. It was basically him saying Coder asked him about me, which, while not completely conflicting with Coder's story...doesn't really match how I truly want it to. @Hoid Slayer, what was your PM with Coder like?
Hoid Slayer He/Him Posted Thursday at 07:31 PM Posted Thursday at 07:31 PM 15 minutes ago, |TJ| said: Posting Illwei's explanation of the situation - @Hoid Slayer, what was your PM with Coder like? I’d prefer to refrain from that until TUC has spoken, so that he can’t just pop in and say his was basically the same as mine What I do find interesting and hadn’t realized is that Coder’s only PMs were with me and TUC. So if TUC is evil, his only PM was with me I must admit, I am beginning to doubt Yet at the same time, I don’t want to allow doubt to enter my head at this point in the game, especially when I don’t see a clear better option I don’t think TUC blocking Grub and then me surviving/no NK working against Grub when Coco also saved me I think I’m gonna leave my vote where it is for now, unless TUC is very convincing
|TJ| he/him Posted Thursday at 07:40 PM Posted Thursday at 07:40 PM 6 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said: I don’t think TUC blocking Grub and then me surviving/no NK working against Grub when Coco also saved me You mean Mint saved you. Bro, you are ignoring bigger evidence and hyper-focusing on the illwei issue. how about you shoot TUC with shardblade next cycle?
Hoid Slayer He/Him Posted Thursday at 07:43 PM Posted Thursday at 07:43 PM 2 minutes ago, |TJ| said: You mean Mint saved you. Bro, you are ignoring bigger evidence and hyper-focusing on the illwei issue. how about you shoot TUC with shardblade next cycle? Yeah, Mint, mixed em up Look, how about TUC responds and then I make a choice?
coco.pudding she/they Posted Thursday at 07:44 PM Posted Thursday at 07:44 PM 8 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said: when Coco also saved me What is this referring to? The tie idea is an interesting one. I’m not sure what the votes are atm but I could be willing to switch to facilitate that. I think it could make sense to see who the elims decide to save. Although if this is lylo maybe that’s a bad idea…
Hoid Slayer He/Him Posted Thursday at 07:49 PM Posted Thursday at 07:49 PM 5 minutes ago, coco.pudding said: What is this referring to? Nothing, I made a mistake Don’t switch your vote
|TJ| he/him Posted Thursday at 07:51 PM Posted Thursday at 07:51 PM Noted: Grub's hesitancy to switch to Mint. @coco.pudding, read my case on Grub/Mint
Mint11 she/her Posted Thursday at 07:51 PM Posted Thursday at 07:51 PM okay I don't have time to devote to the game today tbh. so I will fully admit to not reading TJ's new post with as much attention as it deserves. but since he's trying to ex me, I want to respond I feel like TJ has made a couple of strong statements this game based on small details. and they are interesting threads to pull on. but not at all definitive enough to justify strong reads this starts in C1 with the vote on wahr and then from this cycle: Quote I think Grub's reaction here is pointing towards them being elim. I think a villager in their position would be a lot more suspicious towards TUC's claim and they would push back instead. This pacifying approach they are taking towards TUC is elim-behaviour imo. we're pretty late in the game. voting someone on the vibes of a single post during the current cycle makes sense C1, maybe C2. not here unless you're trying to pivot away from something Quote When an elim speaks so little, it is quite important to see what they choose to focus on, is it? it might also just be an elim trying to maintain a minimum level of activity. it would also be wild for an elim who barely posts to use the little posting they do to link themselves to teammates also if we count C1, this is the second time TJ has tried to move the ex away from TUC Quote The ONLY reasoning for TUC is given as the weirdness given by illwei in which the accounts actually tallied but it just didn't feel right which was STILL Illwei's personal opinion. I normally wouldn't have given so much weight to illwei's slight sense of uneasiness. but that slight sense of uneasiness was bang on with coder. so I'm going with it Quote edit1: firstly I don't believe this claim also @|TJ|... why? why were you immediately so sure earlier on that I was lying and TUc was village? I really hope y'all don't break the TUC train. it'd be unfortunate for the elims to sweep in with a village ex after we talled about exing TUC for days now I saw mention above of doing a TJ ex instead of a TUC one. I'm not sure how this makes sense, because in my mind e!TUC implicates e!TJ. if TUC is village, then the case for TJ being elim becomes weaker 3 minutes ago, |TJ| said: how about you shoot TUC with shardblade next cycle? hoid can only do this if he isn't nk'ed I'm going to hopefully off for the rest of the day now bc I really should not be online
Archer he/him Posted Thursday at 07:51 PM Author Posted Thursday at 07:51 PM Vote Count TUC: Hoid, Hopper, Mint, Coco, Stardust TJ: Grub Mint: TUC, TJ
Ascended Grubberfly He/Him Posted Thursday at 07:54 PM Posted Thursday at 07:54 PM I’m not liking how buddy TJ and TUC are… Im keeping my vote on TJ.
|TJ| he/him Posted Thursday at 08:01 PM Posted Thursday at 08:01 PM 2 minutes ago, Mint11 said: we're pretty late in the game. voting someone on the vibes of a single post during the current cycle makes sense C1, maybe C2. not here unless you're trying to pivot away from something you are taking away a LOT of context behind the post. this is grub reacting to someone who has essentially sentenced them to death and I believe their reaction is very important to their alignment, and cannot be simply whittled down to a 'single post'. 7 minutes ago, Mint11 said: also @|TJ|... why? why were you immediately so sure earlier on that I was lying and TUc was village? TUC has been fully in his village meta. I don't see TUC being linked it ANYONE else whereas you can be linked to Grub, and a team of Grub/Mint makes perfect sense. @Hoid Slayer, this is another point. Who do you think is teamed up with Hoid? Star? Hopper? Both of them make way way less sense that Grub/Mint.
Hoid Slayer He/Him Posted Thursday at 08:32 PM Posted Thursday at 08:32 PM 38 minutes ago, Ascended Grubberfly said: I’m not liking how buddy TJ and TUC are… Im keeping my vote on TJ. We’re not exeing TJ today If you wanna kill in that pool, vote TUC 31 minutes ago, |TJ| said: @Hoid Slayer, this is another point. Who do you think is teamed up with Hoid? Star? Hopper? Both of them make way way less sense that Grub/Mint. I assume you mean who I think is teamed with TUC Last cycle I did some process of elimination, and I would continue that I’d also look into you at this point, tbh
Ascended Grubberfly He/Him Posted Thursday at 08:35 PM Posted Thursday at 08:35 PM 2 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said: We’re not exeing TJ today If you wanna kill in that pool, vote TUC TJ TUC Yeah, it seems I've come full circle on TUC.
coco.pudding she/they Posted Thursday at 10:42 PM Posted Thursday at 10:42 PM 2 hours ago, |TJ| said: read my case on Grub/Mint I did. That’s what’s making me struggle so much. On the one hand I think your argument makes a lot of sense. On the other hand I’ve been sus of TUC for multiple cycles now and the fact that you’re pulling attention off him leads me to believe you could be the last elim. So I don’t know what to do now. I’m also not sure it matters. TUC has so many votes atp he’s almost certainly going out.
Recommended Posts