Long Game 110? [Sign Ups]: Termina Abandoned (A Majora's Mask Mafia Adventure)

[Burnt Spaghetti she/her]

1 minute ago, Mistfallen Soldier said:

How about sharing Doc’s?

I mean I'd happily share a dead doc with y'all  But peoples mail is something i am afraid I am unable to read, as much as I would love that.

Imma guess Applepen though

[Archer he/him]

12 minutes ago, The Unknown Medallion said:

I think I'm willing to clear Mist and Doc12 here, and I think we should ignore the dead group l2 to go after Haelbarde just in case.

Who we plan on exing and who is evil are two different problems to solve. Presumably the elim who has died will submit the NK, and we need to Bremen block or Scents that person, or at least create IKYK headaches 

[Haelbarde he/him]

43 minutes ago, Mistfallen Soldier said:

Hael, I got your Echo request(i assume it’s you again) and ICMP and all.

I messaged you Doc and Burnt the same message, but only 2 sent (apparently you don't get to find out which didn't send, alas). The vote does seem to make it fairly self evident who didn't receive it though

34 minutes ago, Burnt Spaghetti said:

Oops.

Sigh. I really should have known when I found myself defending you...

16 minutes ago, Archer said:

Presumably the elim who has died will submit the NK

Is that how that works?

[Amanuensis he/him]

8 minutes ago, Haelbarde said:

Is that how that works?

Dead elims cannot submit NKs, no.

I assume Archer meant those in the pool of players that died last Loop.

[DrakeMarshall he/him]

57 minutes ago, Amanuensis said:

I would torture y'all to the end of the Loop actually. (Not a joke. Loops never end early, Masks like Bremen and Romani can theoretically clutch + it would essentially hard clear the exed candidates)

cruel and unusual 

[Amanuensis he/him]

Just now, DrakeMarshall said:

cruel and unusual 

What else is a GM for? 

[DrakeMarshall he/him]

1 minute ago, Amanuensis said:

What else is a GM for? 

I'd say flipping dead players but you're not even doing that this game smh 

[Amanuensis he/him]

1 minute ago, DrakeMarshall said:

I'd say flipping dead players but you're not even doing that this game smh 

Not my fault you didn't read the rules before agreeing to pinch hit  otherwise you knew what you were getting into 

Edited March 14 by Amanuensis

[DrakeMarshall he/him]

Just now, Amanuensis said:

Not my fault you didn't read the rules before agreeing to pinch hit

No everything is ur fault 

[Amanuensis he/him]

1 minute ago, DrakeMarshall said:

No everything is ur fault 

That's what Mom always told me  y'all probably right

[Araris Valerian he/him]

35 minutes ago, Haelbarde said:

Is that how that works?

I think he means the one that died L2. I've made my stance on said person being TJ or Archer fairly clear. The fact we haven't lost the game means that I'm much less convinced of e!TJ/v!coco. In that world, TJ would likely have pushed for a villager as the secondary exe for today. So that means I think elims are Burnt, coco, Archer, and one more. Probably better to try and find the one more than to exe Archer since the pool odds are more in our favor there.

[DrakeMarshall he/him]

13 minutes ago, Amanuensis said:

That's what Mom always told me  y'all probably right

Look on the bright side, "everything" is really quite a lot of things

surely it's not all bad

addendum: Note that while Aman is obviously a sadist it doesn't rly change how we play this

If we've exed 2 villagers then we've already lost, barring a timely block. There's nothing most of us can do abt it and therefore no value in contemplating that world any further.

so we proceed with assuming we already killed at least 1 elim

addendum 2: attack of the clones: Archer, TJ, I'm pretty sure y'all are V/V

source: vibes

sorry for voting you last loop TJ

Edited March 14 by DrakeMarshall

[Burnt Spaghetti she/her]

2 hours ago, Wonko the Sane said:

Burnt, how on earth do you always manage to get into my head even when I'm actively talking about how I never trust you.  

Clearly I should always be trusted, you know this

1 hour ago, Mistfallen Soldier said:

A bit more than that

Hold on, give me time to cook

1 hour ago, Archer said:

I need some evil RP in my life

You can't tell me what to do.  Wait, nvm you've been doing that a lot this game. Let me get on that for you!

1 hour ago, Divergent said:

Would you kindly point us to the direction of the other Minions of Mischief? 

I don't think Burnt could have gotten Scents L2 and then also bought Stone L3, so a teammate had it

Certainly! They live north of me.

1 hour ago, Haelbarde said:

Sigh. I really should have known when I found myself defending you...

You should keep doing that. I'm harmless afterall.

@Doc12 Sooo, flower crowns are still on right?

[DrakeMarshall he/him]

Burnt do u have a favorite kind of rock to turn into

I don’t want to take u for granite

[Burnt Spaghetti she/her]

17 minutes ago, DrakeMarshall said:

Burnt do u have a favorite kind of rock to turn into

I don’t want to take u for granite

Hah.

Okay you live, that made me laugh.

 

I didn't realize chalk counted as a rock type, so i like that. But coal feels appropriate

[Haelbarde he/him]

So what would have happened if Burnt had also had the postman hat? Would we have been told that the hat was worn but anyone attempting to mail letters would find them undeliverable on account of not actually being able to find the postie?

Edited March 14 by Haelbarde

[Myst He/Him]

10 minutes ago, Haelbarde said:

So what would have happened if Burnt had also had the postman hat? Would we have been told that the hat was worn but anyone attempting to mail letters would find them undeliverable on account of not actually being able to find the postie?

PMs wouldn’t be available since we wouldn’t be able to target the postman. Or, if they were available, they wouldn’t get sent

[Through the living Wahr He/Him]

So yeah Burnt is more or less confimred evil, which is good to know, this means that Mist is most likely village.

Please sign your PMs, I got another one where I needed to figure out from context who send it. (Looking at you Doc)

Hael, I am not sure what to think about, you are also on the lower activity end (at least in more recent loops), which makes it hard to get much Info about you, but It feels wrong to have 2 low activity Players in the elims,  at least my Gut says So. 

[Araris Valerian he/him]

I think we still need to be asking ourselves why e!Burnt claimed to have scanned Mist on D1. Do y’all think we would have exed her or another elim without that happening? It seems apparent that it wasn’t an attempt to save an e!coco’s rupees, which is what TJ was concerned about.

[Myst He/Him]

4 minutes ago, Araris Valerian said:

I think we still need to be asking ourselves why e!Burnt claimed to have scanned Mist on D1. Do y’all think we would have exed her or another elim without that happening? It seems apparent that it wasn’t an attempt to save an e!coco’s rupees, which is what TJ was concerned about.

I don’t think so, she accused me pretty much right out of the gate, so as far as I know there weren’t any trains or anything similar 

[DrakeMarshall he/him]

1 hour ago, Burnt Spaghetti said:

Hah.

Okay you live, that made me laugh.

 

I didn't realize chalk counted as a rock type, so i like that. But coal feels appropriate

I’m glad u like coal cuz that’s probably what u get in ur stocking 

[Araris Valerian he/him]

16 minutes ago, Mistfallen Soldier said:

I don’t think so, she accused me pretty much right out of the gate, so as far as I know there weren’t any trains or anything similar 

I’m not sure you understand my question. I’m asking about what might have happened in a theoretical world in which Burnt did not claim to have scanned you. Presumably, the elims didn’t want such a world to resolve, since Burnt made her claim. But why? What were they worried about preventing? Why not sit and wait a bit before making the claim?

One possible explanation is that they hoped we’d exe v!Mist, and then Burnt would be immune to the D2 exe. This implies a lack of thread control, since literally nobody votes Mist or even really suggests it other than Burnt. Notably, coco is rather waffly on which of them to believe, and Archer kinda is while also voting Burnt. e!Twinstorm is not required in this world. Honestly, I don’t buy this world.

Another possibility is that Burnt and Mist are e/e. This one is weird and I think it requires e!TJ to make any sense. I can’t really see coco being elim here, which means if we haven’t lost then Twinstorm is elim 4.

I’ve been advocating for the second option, and nobody has really presented an alternative (an e/e scenario with v!TJ or an e/v scenario that explains the lack of votes on Mist) that I find convincing. I guess if coco/Burnt are e/e (which the L2 voting could indicate), Archer is probably an elim, and IDK about the 4th. But that still kinda implies that D1C was a misfire of epic proportions.

So my team proposals are Burnt/Mist/TJ/Twinstorm and Burnt/coco/Archer/+1.

[Myst He/Him]

6 minutes ago, Araris Valerian said:

I’m not sure you understand my question. I’m asking about what might have happened in a theoretical world in which Burnt did not claim to have scanned you. Presumably, the elims didn’t want such a world to resolve, since Burnt made her claim. But why? What were they worried about preventing? Why not sit and wait a bit before making the claim?

One possible explanation is that they hoped we’d exe v!Mist, and then Burnt would be immune to the D2 exe. This implies a lack of thread control, since literally nobody votes Mist or even really suggests it other than Burnt. Notably, coco is rather waffly on which of them to believe, and Archer kinda is while also voting Burnt. e!Twinstorm is not required in this world. Honestly, I don’t buy this world.

Another possibility is that Burnt and Mist are e/e. This one is weird and I think it requires e!TJ to make any sense. I can’t really see coco being elim here, which means if we haven’t lost then Twinstorm is elim 4.

I’ve been advocating for the second option, and nobody has really presented an alternative (an e/e scenario with v!TJ or an e/v scenario that explains the lack of votes on Mist) that I find convincing. I guess if coco/Burnt are e/e (which the L2 voting could indicate), Archer is probably an elim, and IDK about the 4th. But that still kinda implies that D1C was a misfire of epic proportions.

So my team proposals are Burnt/Mist/TJ/Twinstorm and Burnt/coco/Archer/+1.

Ah. I see, that requires a look at D3B. I’ll go look at that, since I don’t remember our stance at that point.

obviously, I disagree with your first Elim team, but I agree with coco/Burnt, not sure about archer though. I think Twin is the fourth Elim though. And I don’t have any good leads for the third right now

[Araris Valerian he/him]

2 minutes ago, Mistfallen Soldier said:

Ah. I see, that requires a look at D3B. I’ll go look at that, since I don’t remember our stance at that point.

obviously, I disagree with your first Elim team, but I agree with coco/Burnt, not sure about archer though. I think Twin is the fourth Elim though. And I don’t have any good leads for the third right now

So in your opinion, we have already won the loop?

[Myst He/Him]

6 minutes ago, Araris Valerian said:

So in your opinion, we have already won the loop?

Yeah, I think we have.(edit: I’ve been wrong about the previous loops though, so we may not have)

And with a brief look at D3B, the main trains there were coco and Stick. Where Stick narrowly had more votes than Coco. Which makes me think that burnt was trying to prevent coco from going out, like we assumed. I can’t think of anything else she’d be trying to distract us from

Edited March 14 by Mistfallen Soldier