Jump to content

|TJ|

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2259

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by |TJ|

  1. |TJ|
    Hmmm, if Araris selected the location pile deliberately, it means the crime is not specific to any kind of rooms in the house (Location #1 pile). Yes you'd imagine hut/shack to not have many rooms but still it feels like hut/shack is not the accurate location of the crime. I was thinking of a cave... perhaps that's closer to Wilderness but not sure. Cave could fit with Naked + Ritual.
  2. |TJ|
    This feels like some weird kind of Dumb Charades, with Araris acting it out and we're all trying to guess it. Hmmm, acid would come more under 'Severe Injury' no? Why not? All other choices seem to cover any other possibility. Elegant and Shabby are opposites. Neat and Untidy are opposites. I can't think of any other options. If it's something like Regular Clothes, it'd be better covered under Neat. Will agree though clothing damage/only topless is possible.
  3. |TJ|
    Sounds a bit cult-y I guess. I want to ask if naked as in naked-on-the-day-of-birth or only from waist-up, because if it is waist-up then naked + hut/shack could be mean a treatment/medical procedure gone wrong accidentally. And that would lead to Bookwyrm (Disease). Other way would be an accidental death during the conversion of someone to a Dakhor Monk, but why would the conversion take place in a hut rather than a monastery?
  4. |TJ|
    Give me some time to figure out if I can do it or not. In the meantime, I'd like to nominate Mat and Fifth. very late edit: realised I should have probably tagged @Fifth Scholar
  5. |TJ|
    J. Jonah Jameson anyone? :P.
  6. |TJ|
    I have not consumed any form of Les Miserables through any medium, sorry :P.
  7. |TJ|
    Sigh, you are gonna make me sign up as JJ, aren't you? xD I guess that works... unless you have directed a Star Wars trilogy and split the entire fan base, but that's not me :P. (yes sign me up as JJ)
  8. |TJ|
    I think the simplest solution to the problem is to just drop a PM to players with aversion to evil play before the game begins. "Are you okay to play evil in this game?" And we're all honest people here, everyone here is with integrity so it's obvious that the reply will be honest and not "nope" every single time. And the player could give a reasoning to the GM, which could explain to satisfactory conclusion why it's not a good idea for the said player to be evil in that particular game. IIRC, El did this to Kas for her BT game.
  9. |TJ|
    I was kinda hoping Aman wasn't an actual Thug, sigh. But then I don't get it, why try so hard last cycle? xD Anyways, gg everyone. I hate being a villager in the endgame >>
  10. |TJ|
    I actually considered this post waay earlier in the cycle as you outing yourself and gg-ing me because I had a decent village game :P. Well, this game ends all too similar to MR57 too >>
  11. |TJ|
    It's 2:30 am here smh. I really want to check out of this game so badly, but I keep getting pulled back in. Recently I was thinking that you were an Unsnapped originally and got Spiked with Tin.
  12. |TJ|
    If e!me knew Fifth had Zinc, I would have used the situation to protect Biplet from elimination. And I think for any elim, Fifth is the obvious kill. More so in your case because you seem to be very much aware of "elims win on parity if village has no vote manip" case and it would make sense for you to remove the possibility of village vote manip and win on parity if you're actually a Thug.
  13. |TJ|
    Sigh, see this is what I meant by getting flashbacks to MR57. You're doing the SAME thing you did with me and Mat in that game when you and Orlok we're evil together. I will consider an e!Araris world till the end though. And that argument you made about siding with him doesn't hold true. You can go back to the last cycle and check the post where he said he PMed and noticed I was checking his PMs 3 hours earlier. I had voted on Biplet quite earlier before he PMed me claiming Zinc. Plus bro, I was very strongly on you to vote on Bip. In the event that you're village, I received a PM from Biplet in the last minutes of the cycle, asking me to switch to Araris. Fortunately for me, I was soundly asleep and checked the message only after rollover as I would have gone mad with paranoia. Unfortunately for me, I'm still going mad with paranoia not knowing if it was a distancing ploy from Biplet.
  14. |TJ|
    @Araris Valerian @Amanuensis, I think we all missed this. End Cycle Early
  15. |TJ|
    Yes Fifth claimed to me that he had Zinc mid last-cycle. Which is why I changed stance on him like - if you're the convert we've already lost. Or else you're village. Aman Will read more to be sure.
  16. |TJ|
    I honestly wanna vote you here so badly, this is just what to did to me and Mat in MR57 -.-
  17. |TJ|
    Just realized another village point for Araris. If he's evil, he knows I'm Unsnapped with no reason to lie about my Snapping condition. Then him making me counter-train to the elim is risky because suppose it's Elim 3-2 TJ and elims have a Soothe, then there is a chance that in addition to the elim dying, I could Snap and get Soothe/Riot/Thug/Lurcher/Coinshot. So elims probably avoid making me the counter-train here.
  18. |TJ|
    I'm having a headache trying to figure this out smh. a. If Inq!Aman is scanned to have done nothing in C2 -> Wiz should have submitted the kill on Stick in C2 -> But Wiz also knew Bip's role in C3 -> Wiz banked on a future convert on Bip and lied during C3 in the hopes of converting Bip in C3. Therefore, Inq!Aman works only and only if Biplet had been converted in C3 (or C4 if Inq rolled Tin for the duration of C4). Wiz obviously did not scan Mat as he killed TKN. Inq converted Biplet. b. Inq!Bip -> Wiz did not scan anyone in C2 -> Wiz could have killed in C2 and Inq could have converted -> Honestly any of the three could be converted, since Fifth claims to have burned Iron in that cycle. Little less chance of converted Araris because of atium. Little more chance of converted Aman because of the Thug claim. c. Inq!Araris -> Kas did not scan Araris -> Kas killed Bookwyrm. Araris converted someone -> Unlikely to be Fifth due to voting pressure. Possibly Aman due to elim team synergy of Kas-Araris-Aman. Biplet slightly less possible. (a) and (b) required e!Biplet, so going for her is the correct decision here, I feel. If it's (c), well I don't think I can make an argument to convince y'all to vote Araris this cycle. I don't think I can convince myself. Can just say "Araris staunchly read Kas as village", that's all.
  19. |TJ|
    If we don't wanna believe Tin Spike, then the simplest answer is whoever is the Inquisitor rolled Tin on C4 and C5. Edit: @Fifth Scholar, you didn't roll Tin in C4 or C5, right?
  20. |TJ|
    Bus? In a 2-member team? From D1? Fine, I won't argue from that point anymore. But do you see the reluctance from Aman to vote on Bip? When both cases lead to the conclusion of e!Bip?
  21. |TJ|
    Aman, it's as clear is this, because just now you said you believe in a Fifth/Bip team when Bip was the Inq. 1. to your POV, If I am the convert, then Fifth is Mistborn, and Araris is Seer, why aren't you voting on Biplet? As she'd be the Inquisitor. 2. If I am not the convert, then she is. And if so, why aren't you voting for her? Both the cases, it comes down to this. Why aren't you voting for her???
  22. |TJ|
    So who is the Inquisitor? Just now you said you believe Biplet is. And now if you believe she's a Converted Tineye why aren't you voting for her?
  23. |TJ|
    Yeah, it's not me. Please go re-read mine and Kas interaction. Bro, we don't allow ourselves to sacrifice each other when we're village, you think we'd be arguing in D1 if we're evil? I've been on e!WizKas more than anyone, except maybe Stick. If Stick was PMing any of you regarding suspicion of Kas and mentioned me, that'd be helpful too. Maybe we're wrong about the Inquisitor but I'm very certain the team is Bip + Aman now. Biplet
  24. |TJ|
    It's not me, sigh. @Araris Valerian, did you use Atium C1 or C2? Aman could have tried to convert you but failed. If not, Biplet is the Inquisitor.
  25. |TJ|
    Smh, I was assuming you could convert and kill in the same cycle, totally forgot about action economy. Okay, just to confirm, @StrikerEZ, conversion is considered as an action, right? Assuming it is, and in a v!Araris world - Cycle 1 - Kas scans Araris accurately, Inq kills Bookwyrm Cycle 2 - Wiz claims to have scanned Bip. Wait, Mat said something hold on - I assume this is C3 beginning because why would Mat ask it in C2. The absolute truth is elims knew Biplet's role at the start of C3. It can happen IF - Wiz scanned Bip OR Elims converted Biplet (either with Tin Spike or she was a Tineye originally) OR Bip is the Inquisitor. Case - 1 : Wiz actually scans Biplet. Inq kills Stick. Case - 2 : Wiz kills Stick. Inq converts Bip (either with a Tin Spike or she's Tineye from the beginning, doesn't matter) Case - 3 : Wiz kills Stick. Inq!Bip converts someone else with a Tin Spike. Unlikely, as it requires Inq!Bip to take a leap of faith that Mat was not bluffing about his role as she claimed to have watched Mat in... C3 I think. Need to look into Kas-Bip interactions/mentions to be more confident that this is not likely. Cycle 3 - Now Wiz obviously did not scan Mat, which is why he hasn't sure of the result. Continuing the cases from Cycle - 2: Case - 1 cont. : Wiz kills TKN. Inq [Araris/Aman] converts one of Bip, Fifth and the other of [Araris/Aman]. Fifth claims to have burned Electrum this cycle. In e!Aman case, v!Araris unlikely to be the convert as they know he's Seer and it's late in the game and they cannot afford a failed conversion. Case - 2 cont. : Bip is converted in this case. Irrelevant what Wiz or Inq does in the cycle tbh. Inq remains confined to Araris or Aman. Case - 3 cont. : Bip is Inq in this case. Convert in [Aman, Araris, Fifth] Tldr: Case - 1 (Scans Biplet in C2, Conversion in C3/C4?) : TJ - Village Unsnapped Araris - Village Seer/Converted Elim Seer/Inquisitor Aman - Inquisitor Fifth - Village Mistborn/Converted Elim Mistborn Biplet - Village Tineye/Converted Elim Tineye Case - 2 (Conversion in C2, Convert is Biplet) : TJ - Village Unsnapped Araris - Village Seer/Inquisitor Aman - Village x?/Inquisitor Fifth - Village Mistborn Biplet - Converted Elim Tineye Case - 3 (Conversion in C2, Bip is Inq) : TJ - Village Unsnapped Araris - Village Seer/Converted Elim Seer + Tineye Spike Aman - Village x?/Converted Elim X + Tineye Spike Fifth - Village Mistborn/Converted Elim Mistborn + Tineye Spike Biplet - Inquisitor I had typed till here and then I had to leave as I'm travelling overnight tonight. Typing this in the bus as we speak, I wanted to post this along with thread re-read + vote analysis to see which case is even more filterable. I'll get to that tomorrow, but as I see right now, Case 1 and Case 2 are a lot more likely than Case - 3, and whenever Araris v Aman come up in Inq discussion, Aman is more suspect.
×
×
  • Create New...