Jump to content

Frustration

Members
  • Posts

    12257
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    41

Everything posted by Frustration

  1. Nope. This Pokemon is fully evolved.
  2. So since Investiture can be changed from type to type anyone in era 4 with a single breath can have infinite Investiture?
  3. And where is that energy coming from? The SR is composed entirely of Investiture, so unless you want to argue that each breath can pull an infinite amount of Investiture from the SR and turn it into energy, without a way to put that energy back. We just have to say "yeah this is one of those places where physics stop making sense, just ignore it."
  4. This Pokemon is from Gen 1
  5. Clarification on number 3. Are you saying that it is fully evolved or that it has no evolutions?
  6. I think that Radiants change color, but regular blades just make them light.
  7. So we know inentless Investiture could be made, but I don't think that this is the right way to do it.
  8. Yep, thank you.
  9. If I recall correctly there is a WoB that I will try to find later, that says that something is either in the bubble or not, and there is a certain point where they simply cross over.
  10. Brandon has said that Hoid's healing comes from the Weapon used to kill Adonalsium.
  11. Does it matter? The point is that the Dawnshard is the source of his healing.
  12. As in the vessel? Or as one of the shards? Either way I don't think it works, he was part of the group that killed Adonalsium, and refused a shard afterwards.
  13. The reason Hoid can't be killed by a Shardblades is because he's a Dawnshard, and the healing it provides is so great he can just survive most anything.
  14. Your theory has been Frustrated.
  15. I don't have a problem with people having a "death of the author" mindset. But presenting it as an improvement to the community is a step too far in my mind. Brandon recently said that the Cosmere is meant to have the author/audience relationship that it does, and that "Death of the author" cannot be applied to it without losing part of the experience.
  16. And what would make such a framework desirable?
  17. I don't disagree, I have a particular theory of mine that is incorrect in many of it's conclusions that I still consider to be my best work. However, I think that intentionally disregarding information that disproves a theory takes all the fun out of it. It's one thing to go against information you don't know, it's quite another to ignore it entirely.
  18. Breath and knowledge is all that is needed.
  19. This feels counterproductive, why artificially limit our knowledge? All discussion would basically be pointless, as the answers are already available. While true more people might make theories, their theories will stay in that state, never progressing into the greater theories that require the use of the arcanum. The dedicated theorists will eventually read all of the material needed, whether or not they are given a space where WoB's are forbidden. I can understand the appeal of bringing back the theory culture of the old days, everything I've heard about from that time is a blast. But we know too much now, I don't think we can go back.
  20. How does he count as a relative?
  21. Well if this is a consistent problem I have two possible solutions. The first is to take a scheduled break, say two weeks or so. The schedule is important because otherwise you risk breaking the habit. The second is to just push through it.
×
×
  • Create New...