Well this has been an interesting thread to read, and I’ve decided to give my 2 cents. First off, I’ve never thought about any of this before, not really. I’m just a kid in high school, haven’t exactly been rigorously studying ancient philosophy. Basically all of my ideas and information on this debate have come from this thread. So in a way, you could view my choice as choosing the winner of the argument, since I’ve had almost no outside information presented to me. I’m joking of course, if anything that would only prove which side had the better persuasive writers. Unless we live in a deterministic universe, in which case it proves absolutely nothing, as my choice wasn’t actually a choice.
Anyway, I think I’ve decided to believe in free-will. Mainly because I felt that the arguments pro-free made more sense, but I did come up with a few ideas of my own while reading all of this. So, a Deterministic Universe operates under the idea that all of my choices could be predicted before I do them, given enough information. There’s this classic idea in math relating to infinity, where it’s impossible to list all the numbers between 0 and 1. I could always go diagonally down the list, taking one number at a time, and end up with something that is not on the list. I figure this idea can somewhat be transferred over to this debate. Say you have a sufficiently powerful computer, that has predicted every thing I might do in a given scenario. I could look at that list, take one minuscule element from each possibility, and do that thing instead. Theoretically, the computer wouldn’t have predicted that. I’m sure this is completely flawed reasoning, I’ve already spotted some holes in it myself, but that’s what came to my mind while reading so I thought I’d share.
I do think that even if Free Will can not necessarily be proven, it can be proven that we don’t live in a truly Deterministic universe. All those sub-atomic random events that someone was talking about earlier, they will add up eventually. Even with an infinitely powerful computer, you couldn’t perfectly predict what today would look like if you started the simulation at the Big Bang. Those random events would stack up enough over billions and billions of years, and the computer wouldn’t be able to perfectly determine what the present looked like.
Again, I’m literally just a high-schooler, but I thought that that might make my viewpoint somewhat interesting. A first-timer to this infamous debate. Feel free to ask me some questions I guess, if you want to try and convert me the other way, or if you want to see my first impressions on a different way of thinking.