Yitzi2

But why would a coinshot kill Aman after a challenge like that? Sure, it's possible that he's using it to hide his Inquisitor-ness, but it would seem too big a risk this early. Kipper's "as I've been saying in PMs, but I'm too lazy and busy to post the reasoning publicly right now" isn't very convincing until he posts it. Now that I think of it...by posing that challenge, Aman pretty much ensured that the Inquisitor would kill him and thereby show that he wasn't responsible for the rioting/soothing (if the inquisitor is indeed limited to one action per cycle)...which may have been his intent.

I see I wasn't clear. So let me clarify: -Elenion's accusation of Ecthelion last night made no sense, since Ecthelion was not the only person whose vote was negated. -There are a few potential reasons for this, but Elenion being the Inquisitor was one of them. Since the village definitely wants to have a lynching today (both because an enemy smoker means "follow the cop" is now definitely a no-go and because even if we accidentally lynch a misting, it doesn't give the Inquisitor another opportunity to convert), even that fairly minor added amount was enough to vote for him. (Now I've reconsidered, since his general posting makes other explanations much more likely). However, this is still a fairly weak reason, and therefore I am ready to change my opinion based on the future reasoning of others, should I see any that is good. As for "provide an ad Hominem as if it was reasoning": When discussing the role of a given individual, an ad Hominem regarding that individual is addressing the topic at hand and therefore not fallacious.

There aren't any others yet; that post you're quoting was about what might happen in the future. However, your discussion suggests that what's going on is more sleep-deprived posting than Inquisitorness; while I still would frown on it (that's no way to play a game that requires decision-making), I am retracting my vote for Elenion.

No, but someone else might later come up with a better reason to be suspicious of someone else.

Doesn't follow; false suspicions are not particularly indicative of the Inquisitor, particularly so early and if they have real basis. No, it means that my opinion is based on considering the reasoning of others. But then, your poor reasoning is what got you my vote in the first place, so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised if you continue in that pattern.

I'm not quite sure how your vote follows from Ecthelion's centrality to the current discussion.

As Garshin wandered away from the rambling Keeper (whom, he noticed, had not actually answered the question he'd been asked), he came across another argument. "You know, your accusation of that strange watcher fellow actually was fairly suspicious, seeing as it made no sense whatsoever. The way I see it, you're currently our number one candidate for the culprit. And now that a Smoker is dead, we need to act, as the Inquisitor probably charged a Hemalurgic...oh right, Hemalurgy isn't well known in this age. Suffice it to say that the Inquisitor is likely to have an ally soon, who will be a Smoker as well." ----------------------- That's a vote for Elenion, though it is highly tentative and subject to change if someone suggests a more likely target.

Would that sort of using-the-particular-medium even be allowed by the rules?

And didn't he say he wanted to do some more on Sel before the modern-era Mistborn series? And isn't the main character in the modern-era Mistborn series going to be a computer programmer? While I wouldn't go so far as to consider these connections a full-fledged theory that I'd be willing to predict, I do find them very interesting.

When you read about a parallel realm that is sparse where there are few people, and think "must be related to the Conceptual". (It was the Enchanted Realm of one of Bruce Coville's books, by the way; it's also sparse where there are many people, but that may be similar to how spren avoid crowds.)

I certainly hope Sanderson does not take the OP's advice; I really like his books, but prefer to not have so much sexuality in them. Yes, it is an important part of human experience, but so are many things that don't make it into most books.

Garshin looked at Hyrwynbe. "Would you be interested in hearing about what I personally like to do when I'm not doing anything important?"

Only the compounders; the others would slow down when storing.

I doubt either of them could bond a highspren (the type of spren associated with the Skybreakers) in particular, though other orders might be possible.

Also, we have seen Splintered shards fuel magic systems, so maybe Shattering is likewise not an issue in this regard. And even if it is, it's possible that Hoid's collection of so many different forms of Shardic investiture has an effect in this regard.

Garshin caught the newcomer and laid her down gently, then turned back to Herwynbe. "I was actually wondering what your specialty is. I am correct in my understanding that each Keeper has a specialty in the knowledge they maintain, am I not?"

After Herwynbe's little speech, Garshin went up to him. "Tell me, are you a Keeper?"

But why would anybody Riot to Sark; he was a clear winner. Unless the Inquisitor was trying to cast suspicion...but then it would be more convincing if he soothed only one voting person.

Actually, now that I check it out... @Silverblade5 voted for Aonar, and now that's also been cancelled. So clearly either Ecthelion or Silverblade was soothed, and either the other one rioted TheMightyLopen's vote, or they were both soothed and someone who didn't vote (or an inquisitor whose super-zinc does not negate his own vote) rioted TheMightyLopen's vote. @Ecthelion III, what we're talking about is that someone used Rioter powers to change TheMightyLopen's vote, and using Rioter powers negates one's own vote...and your vote was negated.

Either @Ecthelion III rioted Lopen, or someone who didn't vote rioted Lopen while someone else soothed Ecthelion for purposes unknown. Or the Inquisitor is able to riot and soothe the same day; do we know for a fact that he can't?

Garshin looked at Jelwynd. "Gaetan got a bunch of guys to help him commit suicide. I am convinced that the person or creature writing these letters is under the belief that he is amusing. There's a Terris keeper here who is really annoying. Ruin's plans are proceeding smoothly, but I suspect that has little to do with our current predicament. Though I believe it was mentioned that our adversary is an Inquisitor, so that is some connection."

That just means we don't want to wait for someone to get converted. The question is whether to wait and see if there's a seeker.

I think it's more that he's that certain that if you are the Inquisitor (or become spiked) we can expect to see a lot of WGGs. Although now that you've said that...being overly paranoid about being suspected of being the Inquisitor is the sort of thing one might expect from the Inquisitor. Anybody who's played with wilson before know whether he's usually that paranoid about being suspected?

Of course, that depends on how good the Thug is at figuring things out.

For "beloved", actually. "Good" would be Tov.