AliasSheep
-
Posts
653 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by AliasSheep
-
I'm not sure I like vigilantism, this late in the game when the ratio of noble to gb is so low. Also, it's interesting how there was no GB kill. I can think of a reason for that: there's only one gb left and they used all their actions for something else. I don't know how accurate this reason would be, but there's my thoughts.
-
Shattered Cultivation does mean that the 17th Shard can't unshatter any shattered shards they get, right? I'm not quite sure what the other ways of unshattering shards are, but is it worth trying to destroy Cultivation completely at this point, to block the instant win?
-
Worth it. It's a shame I had to go to sleep, I wanted to see I'd Burnt or Cloud came and corroborated your story. And yes, my spot on analysis that totally said the shinigami was trustworthy So, what, does make me like the 10th Kira or something?
-
Wait, if I got recruited on the last day, does this count as a win for me, or a loss? Or even better, does it count as both? Regardless, I'm glad I manager to survive to the end, even if it was by being ridiculously manipulated by Hael and Elbe, sorry Bugsy!
-
I'm tempted to believe you, especially since Bugsy had essentially voteblocked without me realising it. Elbe did also say something about you being trustworthy and something to do with PMs. I think I'm going to retract my vote on Strawman. I'd like to stay without a vote, to be honest, but I don't like the idea of the vote being blocked by Bugsy or Burnt. So I'll vote for Bugsy
-
Hael pls. There's only so much psyche out eliminator I can take in one game *stares at Joe*
-
Wait what. So I said I was going to bed, and then something occurred. And what EDIT: thoughts on this are, Hael is a holder trying to redirect the vote from the actual Ryuk or Rem. Ryuk or Rem revealing themself is such a silly move that Hael has to be a holder. He could be doublebluffing, but even still, there are two other eliminators, and one other shinigami, so I'd prefer not to take the risk of lynching Hael. So no one vote for Hael.
-
Just so you know, assuming no one else votes, this would force a vote on either you or strawman, or block the vote completely. Before I go, I'd like to say that I think Burnt is the most suspicious of the three candidates put forth, I just voted so we had the widest range of options. And with that, good night!
-
I'm gonna put a vote on Strawman, because at this point, I trust Elbe and her suspicions, and if I vote like this, there's more options for later on, with less chance of vote blocking. Also, I'm going to sleep now, and I won't be awake until after turnover, which means I can't really do anything more for this turn. Guys, let's try and lynch a Shinigami tonight.
-
It was Aman who said you were following people's lead, I'm saying I think it's suspicious that you changed your vote after Aman said he thought you were suspicious for voting after he did. Imo you could have asked without voting, but fair enough I suppose. I don't know if I'd say that, I'd need to check over his posts to see. Previously you said he was the only player providing the information though.
-
I'm gonna put a vote on Burnt, she got very quiet after Joe revealed as a holder (though she seems quiet in general), and then was one of the people who didn't get that PM from him asking if we wanted to be the next holder (this doesn't necessarily indicate them being Rem, but it might). Also, she said she trusted Hael without putting forth any reasoning, and Hael has said he trusts her, and I've already stated that I don't trust Hael, so this makes me suspicious again. Bugsy doesn't strike me as particularly suspicious either. I also just realised that voting on Burnt would block the vote. I'm going to leave it without a vote for now, see what discussion happens, and then vote proper just before I go to bed.
-
Okay, suspicious of your for following his lead, and voting for Mark. My point about you changing just after stands. I'm not sure about the timing for Aman putting forward theories in the dead doc, but you saying you had no other reason for keeping your vote, despite Aman saying he was testing a theory about Mark, makes me think that he'd already proposed it in the doc. Perhaps I'm wrong, this is my weakest point. Personally, I don't see not understanding someone's reasoning for a vote enough to vote for them immediately, maybe you see it differently, but that makes me suspicious. In addition, Aman is not the only player providing information at all, I'm not sure where you got that idea from. EDIT: Arrae, thanks!
-
Uhm, which fallacy?
-
At no point have you said you set out to be lynched.
-
I find it suspicious that you would change your vote from Mark just after Aman has said that he finds it suspicious that you voted for Mark anyway. I also think it was suspicious that you kept your vote on Mark to test Aman's theory. If I understood what Aman wanted to test properly, then you wouldn't need to keep your vote on. I also find it strange that you kept your vote on Mark in the first place, despite saying you had no information to. This would also contradict your later statement that you kept your vote on in order to test Aman's theory, which he says is based on something in QF15 dead doc, which you are in, and had been considering before the game. So as a combination of you suspiciously changing your vote, and your contradicting reasoning for not retracting it earlier, I'm going to vote on you, DC.
-
By the way, I'm removing my vote on Leift, it kinda stopped being a poke a while ago. Will put more thoughts up soon, just going over the thread.
-
Elbe, you got any thoughts on Burnt?
-
Good points on Arraenae, though I went to sleep before most of them were up. I don't think I should have tried to stay up that late anyway, regardless. Elbereth, about Hael not replying, it was as he had made some other replies after my post, but not replied to mine - but that's immaterial now that he has actually replied to it. RE: Village roles. I guess since this was before we knew Rem existed, there's some validity there, though I'm still not comfortable with the idea of having everyone reveal their roles.
-
I've agreed with you and poked Leift since you said you read me as village. What's changed?
-
Hael hasn't responded to my analysis of him, my questions or my accusations. I can only assume this is because he wants to avoid discussion that would get a second vote on him?
-
Ruin can actually destroy multiple planets at once in this, since Roshar is being used to represent the Greater Roshar system (I think it was Hael that wanted to start on Braize), so if Ruin destroys Roshar, they'd be destrying Roshar, and also Braize and also Ashyn. However, it's closer to the Death Star in that it doesn't need an external power source like a sun to be able to pull of its massive destruction. Agreeing with you again, those seem pretty good numbers. Going to poke Leift. You've been around a fair bit, but haven't put your opinions out. What are your thoughts on the game at the moment?
-
Can I get reasoning for clearing Burnt and Trel?
-
<3 I agree with you on the Trel bit, though it's not something I would have picked up on myself. EDIT: Off-topic, but something that came up in our world PM: Is Ruin's world destroyer ability more like the Death Star or Starkiller base. I'm leaning towards Starkiller. Thoughts?
-
Hmm, I don't see how that would be relevant to this game, but I guess I'll wait and see.
-
Thanks. Guys, can we get some more discussion going? I think that at this point in the game, we need a lynch every day. Hael, which are the three people you trust?
