Jump to content

Mark IV

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    842

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mark IV

  1. Mark IV
    I seem to have a bad habit of making a post and then forgetting to actually post it. Either way, I finally made it onto someone's suspicion list! Hurray! (Or probably not...) Anyways, zas, if you want a demo of how I act as an eliminator, visit AG2 and LG16. I'm not sure what you find forced, but it just may be that you're reading it in a tone other than the one I think in. So, maybe... yeah.. (okay, that last part there wasforced) One reason may be that I'm trying to make my post a bit longer to account a bit for my less frequent activity post-wise Either way, I'm sure someone's noticed this, but there's been two mentions of Wilson's innocence (or lack thereof) in deathcries. I myself have her in my mildly suspicious list but I'm not voting on her because if I'm wrong, that'd be bad for the village, especially late game. And, I've not even played a game with her before... My reason for suspicion on Wilson is partially gut, but it is also that her posts seem a bit manipulative. I can't really put my finger on it though. So, that's another reason I'm not voting - it'd mainly be a gut based vote - and those have been mainly wrong in my case.
  2. Mark IV
    Kas, I apologise. My words, I now realise, aren't clear. What I'd meant by "For now though, I believe Luna is innocent. Rather than outright defending Luna, I feel a better move would have been to seal her fate had she been up for lynch. But, both those moves are not too good in the long run." I meant that - 1) I believe Luna is not proven guilty by this scenario (though she may actually be guilty. Just that this is not enough proof to say so) 2) The "Rather than...." part is said as a devil's advocate (sort of) where I assume both Orlok and Luna were evil, and then, I go on to see the drawbacks of Orlok defending Luna. 3) So, all I was saying was that, in my opinion, defending Luna wasn't such a good strategy incase both Luna and Orlok are evil. 4) The "seal her fate" part is just another case where Orlok could have made the final vote, doom ing Luna, and if she were evil, then he'd effectively be cleared. 5) But, both these plans were not really beneficial to the eliminators as compared to other possible thing they might have done. Anything else?
  3. Mark IV
    IIRC, Orlok hadn't jumped to the front line when anyone had voted for an eliminator in QF14, but, I'll have to check about that. His actions in that game could help us here. Though I'm sure I'm not the first one who thought about it. For now though, I believe Luna is innocent. Rather than outright defending Luna, I feel a better move would have been to seal her fate had she been up for lynch. But, both those moves are not too good in the long run. That code though.... o.O Sorry for my lack of posting. Holidays have just started today, and I hope to post more soon. (I always say that, don't I... ) EDIT: A question to anyone with an answer or any thoughts - what information would Orlok have gotten after his death that he had to transmit to his teammates? He had no items, and so, the only explanations are - He had an item from an artifabrian , mainly an alerter or emotion bracelet. Thus suggesting there might be another artifabrian in the GB group. Another explanation is that he's just trolling us, trying to take our focus off of something else/the game in general.
  4. Mark IV
    So, the last remaining spiked is in fact Araris. How ironic, in a sense. My props go to the GMs, for running such a complicated game (sort of). Very well executed, I must say, and I look forward to playing again.
  5. Mark IV
    Perhaps they guessed elodin had protection? That might be why, in case the GBs have the shard blade, they double tapped him? Props to the grand bow user! So... Elodin died... he seems to have a habit of that in some games...
  6. Mark IV
    I'll be putting my vote on Joe. Your call asking for someone PMing you seems phishy to me as that is basically ask people "Who has a spanreed?" Now, that is a bit on the non-good side for me. But of course, that might just be a completely innocent call for some chat. Some things, you just never will know. EDIT: Joe oh wait. I misread that post to mean something else entirely. My fault! X(
  7. Mark IV
    Anyone there? Or has the game ended already?
  8. Mark IV
    I think that there is one aspect that we haven't looked at yet though. The Thief. Being a former thief myself, I found that prolonging the game for a thief is much better. But, I'm not sure that that's necessarily good for us. So, people, what are your thoughts for the thief? I think I know who the thief is.
  9. Mark IV
    SD, I meant that an eliminator asking to be lynched is suspicious.
  10. Mark IV
    GM, does soothing multiple people take more than one turns Or just one turn? Either way, I don't think I'm very intent on letting 3 beads of lerasium fall into the wrong hands. Actually, on the contrary, I'm far more suspicious of SD asking for votes. So, I'll just hang on to mine.
  11. Mark IV
    So, wait, SD is evil, Araris has 3 beads of lerasium and Burnt is not interfering with votes? Is that all or am I missing a subtext here?
  12. Mark IV
    A MESSAGE TO EVERYONE : Unless you're tapping brass this turn, send me a PM about what you're tapping this turn. Also, send me a PM telling me what you tapped last turn. (Unless you've already done so) Don't omit ANY info. To eliminators: You can come out any time now.
  13. Mark IV
    Hmmm. Time for some info to come out. During everyone's info reporting to me, I noticed elodin had reported starting with only a charge gold. Since everyone started with 3 charges, and it is also mentioned in the rules, I thought elodin was hiding something. And, only someone who is an eliminator would do that. So, I initiated a plan to see whether he would lie again. I'll admit, this plan actually was to catch a few other eliminators. The way that would work was that the person who didn't do their job, yet still reported the expected findings would be bad. So, the plan went like this- (this plan happened last cycle) Luckat scans elodin with bronze. Lopen scans elodin with bronze. In case I die, both of them send their scans to Maill. In case I didn't die, both of them would send the results to me. All luckat knew was that she was to send the scan to Maill if I died.. She did not know about lopen also scanning Elodin. All Lopen knew was the same as luckat. He didn't know about luckat scanning elodin. Maill knew of this whole plan. I'd begun to trust him by then. I'd told Burnt to suspect luckat and lopen if Maill and I'd died. And, I'd told her to lynch elodin in such an event. The purpose of scanning elodin with two people was that - 1) the lying person would be caught red - handed. 2) to make sure they didn't just fabricate results without scanning. Both Lopen and luckat did as asked, and the result was as expected. Elodin later claimed, upon being asked, that he'd omitted two charges from his starting charges as he thought they were unimportant. This is highly suspect to me. I think one of his eliminator teammates told him to correct this information, but only if he was specifically asked by me. Either way, I believe Maill was not killed due to his involvement in this plan. Instead, he was killed for some other reason. My reason for telling this is not really clear to me either, except to explain my suspicion of elodin. But, I feel this information should be out in the public. If anyone has any theories, or info relating to this, please make it public, or tell me about it personally. This might be my last cycle alive. Oh! And I mostly trust luckat. And, I believe someone in on the plan is an eliminator. Most probably Lopen. But I'm not too sure about him being evil. So, if I die, don't go on and lynch him just because I said so. Phew. That's all for now. Elodin, if you're good, I'm sorry for lynching you. But,I tend to give people a lot of benefit of doubt, which is a bad thing many a times. And, your death also gives us/me a lot of information.
  14. Mark IV
    Sorry for the late post. I meant to post yesterday, but I went off to sleep. Currently, I have no major opinions on anything. Strawman's votes have been suspicious to me ever since Ada's game in Westeros. With that said, Seonid what do you have to say?
  15. Mark IV
    Sorry for the double post, but I think I should put this separately. Everyone, I request you tell me your most probable second cycle actions. I.E. tell me what you plan to store/tap this cycle and on whom you plan to take an action, if applicable. And, don't forget to put in your actions! Also, eliminators, now would be a good time to reveal yourselves. It would be geatly appreciated. Say, has anyone ever trolled their whole eliminator team by declaring their names D1?
  16. Mark IV
    PK Thank you for the response. Well, I guess I missed the fact that Lopen was one of the lynchees. I guess that solves that then. Anyways, I'm mostly satisfied with PK's reasoning here. And, PK, sorry for the confusing PM shenanigans. My mistake.
  17. Mark IV
    Well, I'm not used to voting this early in the game, but I feel I should do something with my limited time. So, I find PK to be suspicious with what information I have. First - he votes for Kyne for RP reasons. Sure, a general action that could have been done by anyone. But, when there was a tie in votes, he is saved Lopen. This, IMO, is a bit fishy. Sure, it's not concrete, but I don't think anything really is concrete on day two. Even concrete takes some time to harden. So, this is just a theory from my side. The second reason I'm voting for you, PK, is that you haven't replied to my PM even though you've been online after I've sent the PM. A simple hello would've been enough.
  18. Mark IV
    Well, I'm not so sure about the shard thing yet, but I believe you could trust phatt. It would be bad manners for a GM to ruin their own game, I think. And, calling you shard alignment would affect your actions, hence changing the outcome, hence (sort of) ruining the game. Burnt, kandra do exist. Check the updated player list on this threads first post. The one with the blessing written after their name is the kandra. I'll be voting for SD. Going by the assipumption that Araris is good, we have basically won. But, that's the problem. We have literally no proof that Araris is good. We can all just hope. But, hopefully, he will turn out to be good! (I don't know really)
  19. Mark IV
    The no PM rule states that Companions (me and Arraenae) cannot PM each other. We can and will answer all PMs from Terris people (not companions). Preferably, if you want to pm companions, I suggest you PM both me and Rae (that's short for Arraenae).
  20. Mark IV
    Or, perhaps you could even tell us your action. I know this is unconventional, and that we would be overloaded with info, but that might just give us the break needed to catch an eliminators red - handed. So, what do you say? Will you share your actions, or starting charges atleast? It might go a long way in the end. And, I encourage all those who haven't contacted atleast one Comp to do so as early as possible. Perhaps even contact both. Since Rae and I cannot communicate directly, information sharing might be on a low between us.
  21. Mark IV
    Okay. So, I'm not sure if I've mentioned this before, but I'm pretty sure that the eliminators spiked someone who was confirmed. I don't think we'd have had 5 eliminators in this game from the beginning. So, I propose we focus on the scanned. That brings me to say this - I was scanned N5. So, I'm officially cleared. As much information as that brings, I'd like to also remind you that the only people who knew about this (as far as I know) are Burnt and lopen. If you two spread it further, I was not informed about it. The third thing on my agenda is locations. I propose everyone make their locations known, just so we can track where everyone is moving. I'm not saying don't move. Just keep everyone posted of your location. I'm currently in C1. Okay, that's all I wanted to say. And burnt- very good drawing. Loved it. Araris - do use that savantism to kill our last spiked. (I'm guessing that it's the last spiked) EDIT:oops. Didn't see your post, Araris.
  22. Mark IV
    So, my character's name - Mayelek. A brightlord of the 4 dahn who came along with Roion's mass migration to the plains. Quite removed from court politics, he sometimes enjoys ruining other brightlords' plans. Especially if they involve him. Little does Mayelek know what lies ahead of him in these coming days (or is it months?) Question for the GM- Do spaces count as characters in the death cry?
  23. Mark IV
    I mean, it's your choice. Sorta.
  24. Mark IV
    I'm signing up. I'll suggest a name when I wake up in the morning. When is this game starting? I must have missed where that was mentioned.
  25. Mark IV
    Well, personally, I don't think the Traitors would go for a pewter kill, unless it is late game. This would be because of the potential to be revealed. Losing an eliminator for one villager isn't worth it for the eliminators. So, everyone, I agree with phatt. Don't store charges for pewter unless you are evil. If you are evil, then feel free to store and use them. Preferably in the early game. I'm not sure what inputs you want just yet. Perhaps later tomorrow, we'll have more info to talk on. So, right now though, PK, I hope that vote comes off later, unless you have info you're not telling us. If you do have info, please do share it. Currently, I have no major suspicions other that the whole PK/Lopen thing. (It feels strange to be one of the only two cleared players... O.o) Again, if you have info or want something anonymously announced, PM me or Rae. EDIT: there are also disadvantages to killing us companions. Cleverly put in by the GMs, the Traitors have to outnumber only the loyal Terrisfolk. This means that if they waste a cycle or two killing me and rae, then the loyal people get a head start of two cycles on the evil people. Think about that, Enemies of Alendi!
×
×
  • Create New...