Jump to content

Amanuensis

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5932

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Amanuensis

  1. Amanuensis
    Okay lemme think about this. Let's say we don't remove the extra life, yeah? We vote someone else out? We can use Bip as an example. Worst case scenario: C2 Biplet reveals village, spiked NK another villager (we can say you), Inquisitor converts JNV. Assuming 2-8 currently, that brings us to 3-5 against an e!Thug. C3 we vote out e!JNV and he doesn't die, spiked NK another villager (doesn't matter who). That brings us down to 3-4. C4 we vote out e!JNV again and he dies, spiked NK another villager (doesn't matter who). That brings us down to 2-3. C5 is exlo and we need to find the Inquisitor + starting Spiked too. And this is even worse in a starting 3 elim world.
  2. Amanuensis
    I also had the theory of them being the Inquisitor with Pewter this cycle.
  3. Amanuensis
    I’m open to suggestions tbh, but then next cycle is exlo (if we’re wrong)
  4. Amanuensis
    Part of the issue is with the numbers so close already, a Thug being converted would buy the elims an entire extra cycle to get a kill in and probably reach parity before we can vote them all. Otherwise we need to vote out the Inquisitor today and I've got no leads =\
  5. Amanuensis
    Current VC: Last VC: JNV might not be back to vote. Otherwise, @Biplet is the only one missing.
  6. Amanuensis
    Fair I was side-eying Stick's Lurcher claim yesterday until Ash died so I feel ya
  7. Amanuensis
    You killed the other one >> Sage Kangaroo 2.0
  8. Amanuensis
    TBH if JNV is village then I could see e!Fifth. Only because 2 village Lurchers and a village Thug needs some explanation
  9. Amanuensis
    Sure. I self-protected last night hoping to get tapped but that didn't happen, so I can protect anyone else
  10. Amanuensis
    Guess I shouldn't be surprised by the lack of opsec after last game xD Dunno if this is a good thing or a bad thing yet
  11. Amanuensis
  12. Amanuensis
    I'm protecting Wizard tonight btw. With Araris scanned, there's a 1/8 shot Wiz can find the Inquisitor which is nice. Also can disregard Fifth + TNK and Stick for claiming Unsnapped (though I guess that could be Stick's plan rn >>) which just leaves <JNV, Biplet, TJ, Aman, Mat>
  13. Amanuensis
    how many
  14. Amanuensis
    Ayo o7
  15. Amanuensis
    Okay, 10 players left. Let's assume 7-3 right now, either because elims started with 3 or 2 and we count the conversion. Elims win at parity unless the village has vote manip. We exe wrong today, C3 is 5-3 and exlo. We exe JNV today and they live, C3 is 6-3, C4 is 4-3. We buy a little time and the Inquisitor can't just convert JNV to buy time with their extra life in the future. Unless anyone has some good leads, I wouldn't mind stalling for time today
  16. Amanuensis
    I'm not committed to e!Mat or anything, but do agree that I'm having trouble finding a coherent pair that isn't Mat/Stick atm Probably worth noting this with Kas. He's been mostly hands-off with me due to concerns about my alignment / me getting converted, which is understandable, though I have no idea how to differentiate that between genuine respect for opsec or elim fabrication. I lean the former but I might not be the best judge and would rather vote Kas later than sooner, ya dig? That said, I claimed my real role to him D1 because eh why not. He didn't return the favor tho, instead inviting me to guess today, and I nailed it (was kinda obvious from his C1 back and forth with TKN :P). Anyway, then I found out he checked Araris for not Inquisitor and I offered to PM Araris and claim I was the Seeker to shield him, but he ultimately decided to do it on his own (presumably to draw the NK himself, and also to keep me from knowing Araris' role). So yeah. Think that's about all the PM shenanigan stuff I can offer for context o7
  17. Amanuensis
    Current VC: Last VC:
  18. Amanuensis
    No group PMs this game and honesty not a lot of trust among us well maybe between some others but I'm pretty apprehensive about pretty much everyone atm. I think only thing behind the scenes, which is now out in the open, is that I figured out Fifth was the Mistborn that double killed pretty quickly, I let Kas and Mat know, asked JNV if Fifth claimed to them C1 and that's why they trusted him, and the info spread from there. Then the stuff with Kas being a Seeker that found out Araris wasn't the Inquisitor, which he basically openly claimed now so oh well Mat
  19. Amanuensis
    I just reread D1 and he did request a flashwagon on either Xino or Ash, so it does check out. Guess it doesn't matter why the elims shot Book. It's not like there's a huge player list. We can probably find the person responsible via other avenues.
  20. Amanuensis
    1) Mat told you about the contents of his PM with Kas, or? 2) TBF elims would not have seen the extra kills coming and Bookwyrm only had one voter near the end, which was TJ, yeah?
  21. Amanuensis
    Good question. Low info works as well. When Fifth told me his kills and I passed it to Kas, Kas suggested it's because despite Book being up for the exe for a while, multiple players ended with a V!read of him. Otherwise your guess is as good as mine
  22. Amanuensis
    Whoops
  23. Amanuensis
    Current VC: Last VC:
  24. Amanuensis
    Well if you probably deserve it, Fifth. Curious why you think so tho
  25. Amanuensis
    I’m sorry you had a rough time. For what it’s worth, I think you, Steel, and Biplet just kinda got buried by the hyperactivity. A lot of it was, as the game was named, Process of Elimination, which as you noted was exceptionally difficult with all the info roles and scans that could be coordinated with others to ensure accuracy. TBH if you hadn’t fallen for my Vote Analyst trap, I’d have likely died on the v!Sart e!Bip hill. Also looking forward to your next game
×
×
  • Create New...