Jump to content

The Mad Beggar


Recommended Posts

never seen a theory about him. okay, he could be hoid, but then again, anybody could be hoid. not every random beggar can be hoid, and hoid already makes several appearances in some of the characters backstories (not sure if you read edgedancer, so I'm not saying more).

therefore i ppropend for "just a random beggar, but not 100% sure"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Toaster Retribution said:

I read Edgedancer. What does he do in that?

 

edgedancer (minor) spoiler:

Spoiler

when Lift was younger she knew a mad beggar who told her strangely wise stuff. then the guy jumped into the mouth of a big fish. that was hoid. as wit, he mentions that he once spent the best part of a year inside a large stomach. and brandon confirmed that he wanted someplace quiet to use a slow speed bubble to pass the time

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, king of nowhere said:

edgedancer (minor) spoiler:

  Hide contents

when Lift was younger she knew a mad beggar who told her strangely wise stuff. then the guy jumped into the mouth of a big fish. that was hoid. as wit, he mentions that he once spent the best part of a year inside a large stomach. and brandon confirmed that he wanted someplace quiet to use a slow speed bubble to pass the time

 

Can you source that last line? It's news to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always took him as a random madman. 

Jezrien is theorized to be the drunk in the tWoK Prologue who says "have you seen me?" near the Heralds statues. 

It could be him as the madman, but I would like to think that not every character is secretly significant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Pagerunner said:

Can you source that last line? It's news to me.

Unfortunately I can't; it's something I remember reading in the comment of another sharder.

Alas, if this was an academic paper, it would get thrown into the trash for that, but a post in a forum can accept somewhat lower levels of verification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, king of nowhere said:

Unfortunately I can't; it's something I remember reading in the comment of another sharder.

Alas, if this was an academic paper, it would get thrown into the trash for that, but a post in a forum can accept somewhat lower levels of verification.

When you trust your own memory, you can accidentally conflate theories and facts. I have seen it happen with my own theories, people passing parts of them off as canon.

In this particular instance, all I've been able to find on the Shard is a theory: 

No, this isn't an 'academic' paper, but when you refer to a WoB, you should always be ready to verify it. It's the only way to keep discourse free of false ideas, since that kind of incorrect tribal knowledge can be very harmful. Yes, it can be challenging to source some of the more recent stuff, since Theoryland hasn't been updated since December. (Which is partly why the Shard mods are hard at work on their own system.) But every WoB is still in the Events and Signings forum, so they are still accessible, even if you need to wade through some other discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Pagerunner said:

No, this isn't an 'academic' paper, but when you refer to a WoB, you should always be ready to verify it. It's the only way to keep discourse free of false ideas, since that kind of incorrect tribal knowledge can be very harmful. Yes, it can be challenging to source some of the more recent stuff, since Theoryland hasn't been updated since December. (Which is partly why the Shard mods are hard at work on their own system.) But every WoB is still in the Events and Signings forum, so they are still accessible, even if you need to wade through some other discussion.

I've never been good at finding wob, as they are scattered through so many places, at least that I know of. So I just take the lazy man way out of citing an unsupported wob and then hope some more coscientious sharder will provide a direct reference, and then upvote said coscientious sharder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always been intrigued by the mad beggar in Axies' interlude. I think the idea of him being a herald is fun, but I don't think it has much more evidence than the beggar at the king's feast being a herald. If he is a herald, he would have to be Jezrien, because the other 4 male heralds are accounted for (unless Taln is not Taln).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said, either this beggar or the one in the WoK prologue could be Jezrien (or they could be the same person, I don't know if we have enough description to even guess at that) since we've accounted for most of the other male Heralds and neither is lucid enough to fit what we know of Ishar. But by the same token, both of them could just be random beggars with screws loose. Brandon does so love messing with us and has cautioned us on more than one occasion not to read too much into everything he does.

But if we assume for purposes of argument that we have seen Jezrien already, my money would be on the beggar from the prologue since we know that multiple other Heralds were present at the event and both of them have mentioned Jezrien, with Nale additionally implying a level of familiarity with his current circumstances.

16 hours ago, Flash said:

The beggar in edgedancer was hoid. This guy is not hoid. He's different. I think he's a herald. 

Hair-splitting time. Lift thinks about Hoid in Edgedancer but he doesn't actually appear onscreen. The begger she directly interacts with in the novella is not Hoid, but we could be forgiven for suspecting he was at first (I know that was my immediate thought). Turns out he's something rather different...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Weltall said:

But if we assume for purposes of argument that we have seen Jezrien already, my money would be on the beggar from the prologue since we know that multiple other Heralds were present at the event and both of them have mentioned Jezrien, with Nale additionally implying a level of familiarity with his current circumstances.

Double hair splitting time. We have seen Jezrien for sure in the Oathpact breaking scene. So if neither of them are Jezrien, Brandon can still honestly say that we have seen Jezrien on-screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Crucible of Shards said:

Double hair splitting time. We have seen Jezrien for sure in the Oathpact breaking scene. So if neither of them are Jezrien, Brandon can still honestly say that we have seen Jezrien on-screen.

So let's split hairs even further. 

He said that we have seen (or at least heard mention of) all of the Heralds in the first to books. 

The Oathpact breaking scene isn't technically in those first two books. It's a prelude to the series as a whole. 

tWoK would start at the Prologue involving Szeth and the assassination. 

Is that how he meant it though? Or is he cheating like you imply. 

Edited by Calderis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Flash said:

At  this point how can we even split the hair again

Have you ever read Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum? At one point his protagonists are inventing useless fields of study as an intellecual game and one of them was Tetrapyloctomy, or the art of splitting a hair four ways. It's a great word. xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...