Jump to content

Long Game 113: The Thaylen City Council

Topic will be automatically locked at 03:00 AM


Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, Mystfall said:

I mostly promise not to frame you again.

  Hide contents

It’s all Mints fault though, if she hadn’t died I wouldn’t have needed to.

lol

I couldn't self-protect, I was hoping someone else would do it 😔

Posted
16 minutes ago, coco.pudding said:

Dw I’m gonna be elim again and I’ll make sure we don’t kill you C1

And the Highguards?

8 minutes ago, Mint11 said:

I couldn't self-protect, I was hoping someone else would do it 😔

Honestly just asking people to do it like Hoid did might’ve worked

Posted
35 minutes ago, coco.pudding said:

Oh yeah right I’m also going to be a highguard at the same time 

And the other two Highguards? It’s random between the kills you all submit

Will admit, I really hope I get the Queen’s family role, because I really want to detain someone 

Posted
1 hour ago, Mystfall said:

Honestly just asking people to do it like Hoid did might’ve worked

I did ask 😭 but I also put in my action to protect hoid before he mentioned it, so I don't think it makes much of a difference

Posted
4 hours ago, Mystfall said:

Honestly just asking people to do it like Hoid did might’ve worked

I find just the chance that someone is protected is often enough to dissuade elims from risking the NK on you. So (if you have reasonable grounds of course, not just a random villager, but if you're like cleared like I was) then just publicly stating it is often enough. Even if no one does protect you, the elims don't know that.

I do remember an incident related to this I feel somewhat guilty about

In Twin's Lords of Luthadel word-count game, I knew the elims would come after me cause I was the most prominent villager. So I PMed someone who I highly suspected was elim (I think it was Akimiko) and threatened to use an ability on her if she didn't protect me. In the end, she was elim, she did protect me, and I used the ability anyways cause I couldn't wait to find out the result of what she'd done to make my move

Buuuuut village still lost somehow despite knowing the full elim team through a generational fumble

Posted
33 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said:

I find just the chance that someone is protected is often enough to dissuade elims from risking the NK on you. So (if you have reasonable grounds of course, not just a random villager, but if you're like cleared like I was) then just publicly stating it is often enough. Even if no one does protect you, the elims don't know that.

I do remember an incident related to this I feel somewhat guilty about

In Twin's Lords of Luthadel word-count game, I knew the elims would come after me cause I was the most prominent villager. So I PMed someone who I highly suspected was elim (I think it was Akimiko) and threatened to use an ability on her if she didn't protect me. In the end, she was elim, she did protect me, and I used the ability anyways cause I couldn't wait to find out the result of what she'd done to make my move

Buuuuut village still lost somehow despite knowing the full elim team through a generational fumble

I think I skipped that game, I don’t remember why though, I was free to play it, I wasn’t busy or anything. But idk, it was right after the Andor game, I think I might’ve missed the sign-ups?

All I know is later wishing I’d signed up

Posted
8 hours ago, Mystfall said:

I think I skipped that game, I don’t remember why though, I was free to play it, I wasn’t busy or anything. But idk, it was right after the Andor game, I think I might’ve missed the sign-ups?

All I know is later wishing I’d signed up

I remember it was weird due to the lack of experienced players

There was Sart, and that was pretty much it

Posted
24 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:

Was that the one I messed up? Or did I not play that game?

I think you played, but the fumble wasn’t yours

It was me and KSauce displaying a historic lack of use of the resources at our disposal

Posted
21 minutes ago, Hoid Slayer said:

I think you played, but the fumble wasn’t yours

It was me and KSauce displaying a historic lack of use of the resources at our disposal

Oh yes. I got exed pretty early, if I remember right. Unless that was the game were everything had to be in roleplay... I'll have to check.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:

Oh yes. I got exed pretty early, if I remember right. Unless that was the game were everything had to be in roleplay... I'll have to check.

Nope it wasn't that one

Posted

I'm going to be Rules Guy this game. Expect a lot of PMs. 

Jo, do flips reveal someone's Loyalty number? 

Does the Banker's target gain the ability to use their role action twice in a cycle? 

How are the Banker's owed Depo votes chosen? Is it based on recency? Do they get to pick two of three if relevant, or it is chosen randomly? 

Actions are based on your Loyalty at the start of the round, right? But Depo is based on your Loyalty after actions have resolved. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Archer said:

Jo, do flips reveal someone's Loyalty number? 

Yes. (in the rules, if the words "specific Loyalty" is used, that means the actual numerical value, instead of simply Positive, Negative, or Neutral)

4 hours ago, Archer said:

Does the Banker's target gain the ability to use their role action twice in a cycle? 

Theoretically, yes. Notably, only Bankers, Royals, and some highguards can actually take advantage of that, since most roles can only be used during either Night or Day, and you can't take two actions in a single TURN.

4 hours ago, Archer said:

How are the Banker's owed Depo votes chosen? Is it based on recency? Do they get to pick two of three if relevant, or it is chosen randomly? 

Recency. If they've already collected two Depo motion votes, and they gain a third player's vote, the first's debt will simply be annulled. Not very realistic, or capitalistic, but it makes for easier record keeping and strategizing. Good question!

4 hours ago, Archer said:

Actions are based on your Loyalty at the start of the round, right? But Depo is based on your Loyalty after actions have resolved. 

Yes. What action you perform is based on how much Loyalty you started the round with, but the Deposition (And things like the Secretary) will only look at Loyalty after actions have resolved.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...