Amanuensis he/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) 9 hours ago, Doc12 said: Ink voted -3 on Araris and +2 on Mint. Notably the only person who gave Mint any points at all. @Through the Living Ink I see your post where you said -1 to Aman and a positive on Mint. Could you explain the rest of your votes? Oh and Doc, just to add, after I proposed that Gryffindor help me with shenanigans, Ink asked Mint in the House PM if she wanted any positive votes. Mint told Ink to vote according to who they suspect and trust, and Ink said they'd give them the +2 because they had no other idea what to do with it. I don't believe they're paired beyond us sharing a House, unless they were playing wolf theater just for me. And between the two, e!Mint / v!Ink is my impression. V/V is also possible, though. If true we live in a strange world like e!Grass or two pure houses. Edited March 30 by Amanuensis
Through the living Wahr He/Him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) Adding my Own negative Votes on Qian and Coco to the list (2-6) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (2-6) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (2-6) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), (1-3) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), (1-3) TUM: Aman (1-3), (1-3) Coco: Wahr (1-3), My current positives are still TUM and TJ Edited March 30 by Through the living Wahr
Qianweilian He/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 5 hours ago, Amanuensis said: Here's an idea. Rather than one person keeping track of the vote count, everyone should just add their "projected" votes to the list of the last person to update it. That way everyone can personally modify the VC according to their preferences, or just ignore it completely. That sounds fine. Plus, maybe an elim might slip. 5 hours ago, Amanuensis said: If you were elim, would you feel comfortable voting your teammates, either positively or negatively? Would you try to avoid it to limit connective data points? Would you go for the max benefit? Would you do some soft distancing with 1s and 2s? I would vary from +2 to -1 based on the vibes of the thread. 4 hours ago, Through the living Wahr said: Adding my Own negative Votes on Qian and Coco to the list (2-6) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (2-6) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (1-3) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), (1-3) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), (1-3) TUM: Aman (1-3), (1-3) Coco: Wahr (1-3), My current positives are still TUM and TJ I don’t totally understand how this list works? What does the (1-3) or the (2-6) mean?
Through the living Wahr He/Him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, Qianweilian said: That sounds fine. Plus, maybe an elim might slip. I would vary from +2 to -1 based on the vibes of the thread. I don’t totally understand how this list works? What does the (1-3) or the (2-6) mean? Thats the possible negative values each of them could have. Since we didnt show the exact distribution of our Votes there are multiple possiblities how much negative votes they recieved. I made a small error, your total is also 2-6. I have now fixed it in the original post.
Qianweilian He/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (3-9) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), Qian (1-3) (2-6) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (2-6) Coco: Wahr (1-3), Qian (1-3) (2-6) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), (1-3) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), (1-3) TUM: Aman (1-3), I see. Adding my suspicions, though I might change later. I’m still split on my last vote.
Amanuensis he/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) e!Coco only works if e!TUM I think. Both TJ and TUM helped approve the rules so I made the fake Auror claim anticipating TUM to play along like he did with my fake Goalkeeper claim in another game, a long long time ago. Here he shut it down real quick (though this is not a blackout game like that one was, so he was justified in calling me out). Butttt it would be kinda funny if I almost gave e!coco a heart attack and TUM was trying to coach her reaction to not give anything up. I don't know if e!TUM jumps ahead for V!coco like that, but v!TUM could have for e!Coco Edited March 30 by Amanuensis
coco.pudding she/they Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Amanuensis said: e!Coco only works if e!TUM I think. Both TJ and TUM helped approve the rules so I made the fake Auror claim anticipating TUM to play along like he did with my fake Goalkeeper claim in another game, a long long time ago. Here he shut it down real quick (though this is not a blackout game like that one was, so he was justified in calling me out). Butttt it would be kinda funny if I almost gave e!coco a heart attack and TUM was trying to coach her reaction to not give anything up. I don't know if e!TUM jumps ahead for V!coco like that, but v!TUM could have for e!Coco So do you have more to share about that whole situation? Or was it really only a reaction test? Also, @|TJ| did you ever say which house you did friendship with? Edited March 30 by coco.pudding
|TJ| he/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 15 minutes ago, coco.pudding said: Also, @|TJ| did you ever say which house you did friendship with? Not sure if I did here, perhaps I only shared it in my house PM but it is with Hufflepuff. [Catching up post in a couple of hours]
coco.pudding she/they Posted March 30 Posted March 30 8 minutes ago, |TJ| said: Not sure if I did here, perhaps I only shared it in my house PM but it is with Hufflepuff. [Catching up post in a couple of hours] Okay, I figured, but thanks. Was Mist really prefect? I assume you would have said something if that’s not the case, but just making certain.
Amanuensis he/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) 29 minutes ago, coco.pudding said: So do you have more to share about that whole situation? Or was it really only a reaction test? Yeah, it began as a spontaneous joke as TUM had said, but in the moment I decided it would be worth doubling down on to see how people respond. Sorry you were the one that ended up catching a stray but yours was a slot I wanted to feel out better since I'm not in Slytherin, and it felt like a ripe opportunity to see how others might look paired with or against you. I'm not 100% sold on v!you but I think I can buy your votes from a v!perspective. As Archer said, there are no secret roles, although I might as well tease that there is a super secret interaction involving Owl Mail, but I want everyone to be surprised when it happens, so don't bother asking. Regarding the results of it, TUM kinda cut it short. My view of you improved. Grass is probably still V despite Mist's post-death paranoia, even though it's honestly pretty dang sus he +3'd the murder victim and used his strongest votes on two villagers (three if v!coco). It helped spark an interesting TUM/Qian interaction that could either be wolf theater or a actual Qian slip (remember what I said about 99% of slips?). Twin's pop in could be described as wolfy, but tbf I also think that may just be Twin's demeanor by default. Hopper just not voting and then apologizing to Doc is a thing. 3 minutes ago, coco.pudding said: Okay, I figured, but thanks. Was Mist really prefect? I assume you would have said something if that’s not the case, but just making certain. Shhhh opsec. Edited March 30 by Amanuensis
coco.pudding she/they Posted March 30 Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, Amanuensis said: Shhhh opsec. Okay but like the answer will affect my votes
The Unknown Medallion he/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 1 hour ago, Amanuensis said: e!Coco only works if e!TUM I think. Both TJ and TUM helped approve the rules so I made the fake Auror claim anticipating TUM to play along like he did with my fake Goalkeeper claim in another game, a long long time ago. Here he shut it down real quick (though this is not a blackout game like that one was, so he was justified in calling me out). Butttt it would be kinda funny if I almost gave e!coco a heart attack and TUM was trying to coach her reaction to not give anything up. I don't know if e!TUM jumps ahead for V!coco like that, but v!TUM could have for e!Coco Yeah, I just assumed you were joking completely, so I saw no reason to let newer plays get confused by it. Tbh, if I had known it was a reaction test I would have let it play out a little more, but I also wouldn't have made a joke claim in response
Ink and Embers Any pronouns Posted March 30 Posted March 30 11 minutes ago, The Unknown Medallion said: Yeah, I just assumed you were joking completely, so I saw no reason to let newer plays get confused by it. Tbh, if I had known it was a reaction test I would have let it play out a little more, but I also wouldn't have made a joke claim in response (It worked on me; I got so confused)
Mint11 she/her Posted March 30 Posted March 30 22 hours ago, Doc12 said: I get it, my question is just. Mist was prolific in thread, most everyone gave him + points, which is fair. Fallen only showed up in thread once, and your read on her is entirely from secondhand reports of Ravenclaw PM. I do not understand why you decided to trust Fallen more with a +3 than Mist with a +2, do you understand what I'm asking? Honestly I didn't really have a strong read on anyone last cycle, so mostly vibes? I knew my +1 would go to you, but the +2 and +3 were a toss up. My trust in Mist was pretty high towards the beginning of the cycle and it then waned. Not because of anything they did really, but as more activity happened, the more that a strong village read felt pre-emptive for C1 (which it was IMO). I see what you're saying, but I don't really feel that the gap between the two is as noteworthy as you do. Mist posted a lot, but I don't see how that on its own is a strong village move. Mist's slip thing felt village and Fallen pushing for house PM activity felt village also. Quote Well, I think it's awfully suspicious Mint withheld her -3 as if to not tip the exe too far away from Araris/me + she used a +2 on Mist, but yeah. @Amanuensis I only had two suspicions. I guess I could have done a -1/-3 or -2/-3, but my general C1 indecisiveness had me not want to use the strongest vote unless I actually had three people to vote for. I'm reading too many people as village.... I need to get more suspicious. The most interesting thing this cycle is the alignment between Aman and Doc. What I'm seeing in thread is Doc asking questions that seem to be prodding for relationships between me, Ink, Fallen, and Grass (this post). Aman later posts that Fallen and I are among his top suspicions. Aman says he's sure coco and Doc are village (I assume because Doc was asking questions that were also on his mind, correct me if I'm wrong). And then later Doc also shares that Fallen and I are top suspicions for them as well. I don't really have much else to say on this rn, it just struck me as noteworthy. I think its likely an elim sits in at least one of the -1/-2 votes for Araris, since it lets them join the train while still staying a bit under the radar. I already explained why I have a village lean on coco. That leaves Grass, TJ, and TUM. TUM has been participating but I haven't seen many strong opinions other than thoughts around general town strategy. That's kind of an easy way an elim who wanted to stay active to participate since IMO reasonable minds can disagree on strategy, even if they're all village. Grass' posts have given me village vibes, and TJ I'm neutral. I like his analysis but he's also one of the players I find hard to read. I also don't really get the train forming on Fallen. It sounds like the main thing people find suspicious is that she got some unearned positive votes? But to what end would the elims go out of their way to give a fellow teammate positive votes when they're not in danger of expulsion or in the running for one of the bonuses? So far it looks like Doc, Aman, and Qian are voting for her. Going back to my earlier note, Doc seems to have planted the seed for Fallen, Aman had the same thoughts, and then Qian it looks like added himself to the train? I don't think Aman would fake a mind meld with Doc if he was elim (regardless of Doc's alignment) though it's not impossible. So I'm going to say my negative votes as of right now will also be going to Doc and Qian. Hopefully I don't get ninja'd here: (3-9) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), Qian (1-3) (3-9) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), Mint (1-3) (2-6) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (2-6) Coco: Wahr (1-3), Qian (1-3) (2-6) TUM: Aman (1-3), Mint (1-3) (1-3) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), (1-3) Doc: Mint (1-3), I really want to hear from more folks on who they're thinking of casting negative votes on. I'll probably come online again before rollover, but I doubt I'll have time to post again. 20 hours ago, Doc12 said: Pictured: Leonidas v Pali duel "Eat slugs, Slytherin!" @Qianweilian
___ He/Him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 18 hours ago, Doc12 said: Ink voted -3 on Araris and +2 on Mint. Notably the only person who gave Mint any points at all. @Through the Living Ink I see your post where you said -1 to Aman and a positive on Mint. Could you explain the rest of your votes? I was gonna say something C1, but decided it didn't mean anything, but maybe it does. On 3/27/2026 at 7:23 AM, Frozen Mint said: this is so rad I don't want to look at inactivity too early in the game, but I'm also wary of how little we've seen of Ravenclaw so far. Posting votes does give elims more of an edge than villagers IMO. I'm interested in thoughts around sharing votes in the house PM, instead of in thread, to help deduce which houses the elims are in. The downside of course is that if elims have access to all the house PMs, then this will give them an edge over village. I'll share reads later when I can get on a computer/have some more energy. On 3/27/2026 at 11:01 AM, Through the Living Ink said: Mint has mentioned in the house PMs that she is in and out of activity; not doing her own analysis may be more due to lack of time than other factors (at least at this point in the game) On 3/27/2026 at 11:05 AM, mippo said: @Through the Living Ink, is this your first game? I can't remember if I've played with you before. Early on, Mint said she didn't want to look inactive Then later Ink defended her inactivity That's why I asked if this was his first game, I wanted to know how experienced he would be and whether what happened matters or not. And now he lied in voting, ending up giving Mint +2
Mint11 she/her Posted March 30 Posted March 30 Okay now I get where the misunderstanding of me not trying to look inactive comes from. When I said this: Quote I don't want to look at inactivity too early in the game, but I'm also wary of how little we've seen of Ravenclaw so far. what I meant is that I don't want to ding others for being inactive. As in, I didn't want to lean elim based on inactivity. But yeah, I did mention in the house PM that I was just very busy with irl stuff but kept being pulled back to SE because its fun and I haven't played in a long time. 1
___ He/Him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 19 minutes ago, Frozen Mint said: Okay now I get where the misunderstanding of me not trying to look inactive comes from. When I said this: what I meant is that I don't want to ding others for being inactive. As in, I didn't want to lean elim based on inactivity. But yeah, I did mention in the house PM that I was just very busy with irl stuff but kept being pulled back to SE because its fun and I haven't played in a long time. Yeah but what I'm saying is why would Ink defend you?
|TJ| he/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) Okay, so I've caught up. Case (a) -> Observing/only mildly participating in Mistfallen exe (0/+1) Players - Ink, Hopper, Coco, Ms. Fallen, Comatose, TUM, Wahr Note that Comatose and Hopper did not give out ANY votes. Case (b) -> Actively participating in Mistfallen exe (+2/+3) Players - Verdant, Mint, Mippo, Doc, Qian, Twin From case (a): Removing Comatose and Hopper for no votes. Removing TUM for vibe-dar village pinging. Gives me a pool of [Ink, Coco, Ms. Fallen, Wahr] A couple of points regarding Ink. This post here sounds quite pure, despite it acknowledge there is no real reason to her votes, especially the Mint vote. This always confuses me because it plays to my tendencies to give higher weightage to pure posts than votes, which does happen with posts of newer players. We also have the worry/panic that seems to appear in Ink's post when Aman's red scan claim on Coco (which has also been acknowledged now, sigh). I do think there is a possibility that Ink and Coco might be linked. Especially because Coco also falls under case (a) players. I don't really have an opinion on Ms. Fallen, as they have posted and PMed a very limited amount. Wahr. He has posted more during this cycle but I cannot recall anything of note this cycle except - the rescinding Doc vote which I found to be a little odd. Leads me to believe Doc/Wahr not e/e. More on Coco below. From case (b): Leaning village on Verdant from PMs and I do think it is quite audacious for e!Verdant to vote +3 for a housemate, vote them for Prefect, and also kill them at the same time. I expect a new elim to play more cautiously. Mint could be linked with Ms. Fallen. Not sure if just "wanting to be Prefect" is good enough for a +3 village read (re: Mint's village read on Ms. Fallen). Leaning village on Mippo from PMs and they actually seem solv-y without an evil agenda. Regarding Doc, sigh, I do see the signs of the same performative tags (as in tagging players for questions) that did appear in the last game. He says that he has been helpful, mentions giving us info about Owl Mails, but if you recall he did similar things in the last game giving info about senders and recipients of PMs when he has Postman's Hat. I think, I issue for me is that I do not have a baseline for v!Doc; I do not recall playing with v!Doc, so everything he does seems like everything he has done before as evil >> All those things that he says are helpful, I have seen e!Doc do them, so they are all NAI to me. As a whole, I don't think I'm leaning either way. Qian, I think a tiny bit residual trust from Cycle 1 but nothing beyond that. TwinStorm, no read here either. Regarding Coco, that's 2 times now that she's asked confirmation if Mist was Prefect. On 3/29/2026 at 6:19 PM, coco.pudding said: In that same vein was Mist prefect? 2 hours ago, coco.pudding said: Was Mist really prefect? I assume you would have said something if that’s not the case, but just making certain. 2 hours ago, coco.pudding said: Okay but like the answer will affect my votes Why would the answer affect your votes? I do think Coco/Ink could be quite paired and there is a possibility of Ms. Fallen and Mint as well. Which makes this an interesting VC for now -> (3-9) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), Qian (1-3) (3-9) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), Mint (1-3) (3-9) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), TJ (1-3) (3-9) Coco: Wahr (1-3), Qian (1-3), TJ (1-3) (2-6) TUM: Aman (1-3), Mint (1-3) (2-6) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), TJ (1-3) (1-3) Doc: Mint (1-3), Edited March 30 by |TJ|
Miss Fallen she/her Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) Alright idk if I’m playing wrong but I’m gonna state my 4 elim suspects(no particular order). Hopper: On 3/28/2026 at 7:42 PM, Through the Living Hopper said: So I do not know how this game works, I thought negative votes were good. I was so happy that you all had so much faith in me So based on his profile, Hopper has been playing for a while. Saying negative = good is not the kind of mix-up an experienced player would make. I don’t think a newcomer would even think that. Then he failed to vote - again, experienced player. Plus, hopper was really pushing for prefect in the relatively chill ravenclaw pm(which has been stated before). All of this makes me read him as suspicious and elim. Sorry, guess I don’t have good faith. Vergrass: On 3/28/2026 at 7:10 PM, Through The Living Grass said: If Mist was suspicious of me, why was he trying to give me prefect? I gave it to him because he’s more experienced and he tried to give it to me because he said he would die. But if he thought I was an elim, wouldn’t he try to take it out of my hands? The argument in this 1st quote by Vergrass reads very much elim. Hufflepuff only had 2 people, and Archer ruled no self voting for prefects(see house pms). If mist and ver just voted for each other, the tie would be broken randomly. So, we can assume this is where the game of chess to choose prefect comes in. Ver won, but I think that meant he won prefect(and a spell), not the choice for who is prefect. On 3/28/2026 at 6:37 PM, Doc12 said: Mist sent Owl Mail, he suspects Ver/Grass and Qian. Ver/Grass because Mist believes the elims either were set on killing him or switched to him when he explained why he was the best target. 17 hours ago, Through The Living Grass said: he thought that they would try and get rid of us both wuickly as an easy way to get rid of a prefect. Plus, from here we can see that Mist believed Hufflepuff would be targeted to eliminate a prefect. Once this was explained, we can see that it would be easy for an elim Ver to agree with this, then claim the prefect died with Mist. Also, general vibes of Ver’s posts have been reading elim to me, so yeah. And I know Ver’s recently been worried about going down next but all I can say is I’ve been working on this theory for a bit. Aman & Coco: These two definitely have moments individually that are weird or give off elim vibes, but for ease of explanation I’m combining them. The whole fake secret role really bugged me, even though I know people sometimes troll or do weird tests. It was more Aman’s interaction with Coco that felt off. Like I said previously, Aman accuses Coco, then based on 1 thing from TUM Aman eventually goes complete 180(see pg 3, this is too long to quote). As for Coco; when Aman accuses them, Coco just goes with it, playing along. There doesn’t seem to be any real reaction, more of a wolf theater impression. The same thing seems to happen again on page 6. Aman is giving explanation for his actions and general/light analysis, while Coco responds with a question or something and no analysis. Basically Coco isn’t going very in-depth, though we know she can from previous posts this game. It makes me think their discussion is just wolf theater, a show to confuse us. All in all, these two have strong elim vibes. With regards to voting, negatives will definitely be these guys though the order is TBD. Also, I know I’m a new player so let me know if I just sound crazy. Edit: sorry the formatting is weird Edited March 30 by Miss Fallen
coco.pudding she/they Posted March 30 Posted March 30 1 hour ago, |TJ| said: Why would the answer affect your votes? Because if Mist wasnt actually prefect, that would be a very good way for an elim to secretly get ahold of a spell. The fact that neither Mist (via owl mail) or you has confirmed it makes me suspicious of Grass (and somewhat you in that scenario) 13 minutes ago, Miss Fallen said: we can see that it would be easy for an elim Ver to agree with this, then claim the prefect died with Mist. Yep exactly. This. 16 minutes ago, Miss Fallen said: So based on his profile, Hopper has been playing for a while. Saying negative = good is not the kind of mix-up an experienced player would make. Yeah I agree that’s a little weird. I’d like to be able to chalk it up to first cycle with a weird rule set, but everyone else including the new players seems to have gotten it, so idk. But I also assume if he’s elim the other elims would have told him since they’re probably coordinating votes. So that complicates things. 13 minutes ago, Miss Fallen said: Coco just goes with it, playing along Uh. See my post where I straight up accused him of lying and being elim? I wouldn’t call that playing along. I did assume it was a joke tho which is why I also went along with the joke role reveals. 15 minutes ago, Miss Fallen said: Also, I know I’m a new player so let me know if I just sound crazy. Nah I think you’re doing some pretty good analysis generally speaking.
Through the living Wahr He/Him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 Updated VC with Miss Fallens Votes: (4-12) Coco: Wahr (1-3), Qian (1-3), TJ (1-3), Miss (1-3) (3-9) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), Qian (1-3) (3-9) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), Mint (1-3) (3-9) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), TJ (1-3) (2-6) TUM: Aman (1-3), Mint (1-3) (2-6) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), TJ (1-3) (1-3) Doc: Mint (1-3), (1-3) Hopper: Miss (1-3) (1-3) Grass: Miss (1-3) (1-3) Aman: Miss (1-3)
TwinStorm He/Him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 38 minutes ago, Through the living Wahr said: Updated VC with Miss Fallens Votes: (4-12) Coco: Wahr (1-3), Qian (1-3), TJ (1-3), Miss (1-3) (3-9) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), Qian (1-3) (3-9) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), Mint (1-3) (3-9) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), TJ (1-3) (2-6) TUM: Aman (1-3), Mint (1-3) (2-6) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), TJ (1-3) (1-3) Doc: Mint (1-3), (1-3) Hopper: Miss (1-3) (1-3) Grass: Miss (1-3) (1-3) Aman: Miss (1-3) hmm ive been very much out for the cycle and I still need to reread thread, but for the sake of posterity and trust in no particular order, Quian, TUM and Hopper for now these are bound to change
Doc12 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) 2 hours ago, |TJ| said: Okay, so I've caught up. Case (a) -> Observing/only mildly participating in Mistfallen exe (0/+1) Players - Ink, Hopper, Coco, Ms. Fallen, Comatose, TUM, Wahr Note that Comatose and Hopper did not give out ANY votes. Case (b) -> Actively participating in Mistfallen exe (+2/+3) Players - Verdant, Mint, Mippo, Doc, Qian, Twin From case (a): Removing Comatose and Hopper for no votes. Removing TUM for vibe-dar village pinging. Gives me a pool of [Ink, Coco, Ms. Fallen, Wahr] A couple of points regarding Ink. This post here sounds quite pure, despite it acknowledge there is no real reason to her votes, especially the Mint vote. This always confuses me because it plays to my tendencies to give higher weightage to pure posts than votes, which does happen with posts of newer players. We also have the worry/panic that seems to appear in Ink's post when Aman's red scan claim on Coco (which has also been acknowledged now, sigh). I do think there is a possibility that Ink and Coco might be linked. Especially because Coco also falls under case (a) players. I don't really have an opinion on Ms. Fallen, as they have posted and PMed a very limited amount. Wahr. He has posted more during this cycle but I cannot recall anything of note this cycle except - the rescinding Doc vote which I found to be a little odd. Leads me to believe Doc/Wahr not e/e. More on Coco below. From case (b): Leaning village on Verdant from PMs and I do think it is quite audacious for e!Verdant to vote +3 for a housemate, vote them for Prefect, and also kill them at the same time. I expect a new elim to play more cautiously. Mint could be linked with Ms. Fallen. Not sure if just "wanting to be Prefect" is good enough for a +3 village read (re: Mint's village read on Ms. Fallen). Leaning village on Mippo from PMs and they actually seem solv-y without an evil agenda. Regarding Doc, sigh, I do see the signs of the same performative tags (as in tagging players for questions) that did appear in the last game. He says that he has been helpful, mentions giving us info about Owl Mails, but if you recall he did similar things in the last game giving info about senders and recipients of PMs when he has Postman's Hat. I think, I issue for me is that I do not have a baseline for v!Doc; I do not recall playing with v!Doc, so everything he does seems like everything he has done before as evil >> All those things that he says are helpful, I have seen e!Doc do them, so they are all NAI to me. As a whole, I don't think I'm leaning either way. Qian, I think a tiny bit residual trust from Cycle 1 but nothing beyond that. TwinStorm, no read here either. Regarding Coco, that's 2 times now that she's asked confirmation if Mist was Prefect. Why would the answer affect your votes? I do think Coco/Ink could be quite paired and there is a possibility of Ms. Fallen and Mint as well. Which makes this an interesting VC for now -> (3-9) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), Qian (1-3) (3-9) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), Mint (1-3) (3-9) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), TJ (1-3) (3-9) Coco: Wahr (1-3), Qian (1-3), TJ (1-3) (2-6) TUM: Aman (1-3), Mint (1-3) (2-6) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), TJ (1-3) (1-3) Doc: Mint (1-3), There's a lot to unpack here. 1) What do you mean a Mistfallen exe? The exe was Araris. Mistfallen was NK'd. 2) Secondly, why is TUM v!read for pinging but I'm not last game I was pretending to be helpful, this game I'm actually trying to be 3) Yeah, it does seem that you could very easily confirm if Grass was lying about Mist being prefect. Coco and Fallen above both gave reasons to why Grass might choose to lie about it. 4) I personally don't have a clear on Qian. They got a derp clear in the beginning, I don't know that they've done anything to warrant more than that. 1 hour ago, Miss Fallen said: Alright idk if I’m playing wrong but I’m gonna state my 4 elim suspects(no particular order). Hopper: So based on his profile, Hopper has been playing for a while. Saying negative = good is not the kind of mix-up an experienced player would make. I don’t think a newcomer would even think that. Then he failed to vote - again, experienced player. Plus, hopper was really pushing for prefect in the relatively chill ravenclaw pm(which has been stated before). All of this makes me read him as suspicious and elim. Sorry, guess I don’t have good faith. Vergrass: The argument in this 1st quote by Vergrass reads very much elim. Hufflepuff only had 2 people, and Archer ruled no self voting for prefects(see house pms). If mist and ver just voted for each other, the tie would be broken randomly. So, we can assume this is where the game of chess to choose prefect comes in. Ver won, but I think that meant he won prefect(and a spell), not the choice for who is prefect. Plus, from here we can see that Mist believed Hufflepuff would be targeted to eliminate a prefect. Once this was explained, we can see that it would be easy for an elim Ver to agree with this, then claim the prefect died with Mist. Also, general vibes of Ver’s posts have been reading elim to me, so yeah. And I know Ver’s recently been worried about going down next but all I can say is I’ve been working on this theory for a bit. Aman & Coco: These two definitely have moments individually that are weird or give off elim vibes, but for ease of explanation I’m combining them. The whole fake secret role really bugged me, even though I know people sometimes troll or do weird tests. It was more Aman’s interaction with Coco that felt off. Like I said previously, Aman accuses Coco, then based on 1 thing from TUM Aman eventually goes complete 180(see pg 3, this is too long to quote). As for Coco; when Aman accuses them, Coco just goes with it, playing along. There doesn’t seem to be any real reaction, more of a wolf theater impression. The same thing seems to happen again on page 6. Aman is giving explanation for his actions and general/light analysis, while Coco responds with a question or something and no analysis. Basically Coco isn’t going very in-depth, though we know she can from previous posts this game. It makes me think their discussion is just wolf theater, a show to confuse us. All in all, these two have strong elim vibes. With regards to voting, negatives will definitely be these guys though the order is TBD. Also, I know I’m a new player so let me know if I just sound crazy. Edit: sorry the formatting is weird This is really well done Fallen! I definitely agree with your point on Grass, he's explained, i still think its odd he threw away prefect when Mist was so sure he was dying. Re: Hopper. and I see @TwinStorm just responded, I have decided not to pursue Worldhopper and Emperor right now. I mean I'll ping them again, @Through the Living Hopper @Emperor Comatose . Worldhopper's a known low activity/inactive, which is frustrating, but can't really be helped. I think it would be more helpful to actually pursue people who are active so we can find pairings. Re: Aman and Coco, not really sure what to think. I think Aman's continual gambits wear me out, but the reasoning he gives is sound. @coco.pudding I know you had a - on grass. Any other thoughts? Especially as it seems you're leading the exe right now? @Miss Fallen What are your thoughts on Ink and Mint specifically? EDIT: @Amanuensis Might do some RP later. Do you think Amara showed up and discussed things with Azalea? If yes, you can just tell me what she'd have said. If not, that's also fine, Azalea's probably used to Amara sometimes just standing her up xD Edited March 30 by Doc12
Amanuensis he/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 4 minutes ago, Doc12 said: I think Aman's continual gambits wear me out You're telling me man needs to chill 2
Qianweilian He/him Posted March 30 Posted March 30 12 minutes ago, Doc12 said: 4) I personally don't have a clear on Qian. They got a derp clear in the beginning, I don't know that they've done anything to warrant more than that. I'm sorry, but what exactly is a "derp clear"? I'm not sure what you mean by that.
Recommended Posts