Jump to content

CoderDrag0n8

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5999

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Everything posted by CoderDrag0n8

  1. CoderDrag0n8

    Oh god someone either please follow me or unfollow me

    BUT DON'T LET EXACTLY 2 PEOPLE UNFOLLOW ME

    I am so so sorry.

    1. Show previous comments  6 more
    2. Myst

      Myst

      I don’t need to. It’s at 68, until someone else unfollows I don’t need to 

    3. CoderDrag0n8

      CoderDrag0n8

      So people do read these...

      I was begining to think no one did!

    4. Through the Living Potato

      Through the Living Potato

      I’m confused. I’m going to bed now.

  2. CoderDrag0n8

    I have become suprisingly skilled at recognizing AI images

    I saw one recently, and was like 'that is probably AI', and then found like, 4-7 AI image detectors and 4 of them agreed with me

    So like

    I'm really cool

    ngl the way I can tell the best is the 'piss-filter'

    basically if something that would normally be white in an image is yellow, it is probably AI.

  3. CoderDrag0n8
    "Hi!" He waved excitedly.
  4. CoderDrag0n8
    It is I, God was my good ol' days
  5. CoderDrag0n8
    Hello, and welcome to the shard! Mind telling us what Cosmere books you've read?
  6. CoderDrag0n8
    @Doomslug the Arcane
  7. CoderDrag0n8
    oh im god yeah look at my past usernames
  8. CoderDrag0n8
    "G-Grumpy one?" John looks around.
  9. CoderDrag0n8
    gerumble
  10. CoderDrag0n8
    "Do I follow too?"
  11. CoderDrag0n8
    IT'S NOT EVEN THAT BIG IT DOESN'T FILL UP THE SCREEN NOR LAG ANYONE
  12. CoderDrag0n8
    Where did you find this image? Also, hi! I don't think I've seen you around before!
  13. CoderDrag0n8
    Coder walks back in, and says, "HI GUYS! Sorry I took a while!"
  14. CoderDrag0n8
    Humans are actually the 5th intelligent lifeform to appear, and now the top 4 are plotting humanity's exitinction. The top 4: 1. Carbon Dioxide 2. Water Vapor 3. Methane 4. The absence of Ozone And the thing is, we're helping them dun dun dun!
  15. CoderDrag0n8

    HAVE A HAPPY BIRTHDAY

    OR FEEL THE WRATH OF MY KNIFE (pronounced ck-knife-eh)

     

    1. Show previous comments  6 more
    2. Kansas Stormcursed

      Kansas Stormcursed

      @Vielence no clue how your knife defense is, but I'm gonna bet that no, you can't. Sorry

    3. Vielence

      Vielence

      Wait why?

    4. Kansas Stormcursed

      Kansas Stormcursed

      Cause unless you haven't told me, you haven't trained knife defense, and knife is one of the easiest weapons to lose against

  16. CoderDrag0n8
    LMAO 'Could we do it raw' is insane
  17. CoderDrag0n8

    GUESS WHOSE BACK

    BACK AGAIN

    HONOR'S BACK

    TELL A FRIEND

    1. Honors Spectral Image

      Honors Spectral Image

      YAYAYAYAY

  18. CoderDrag0n8
    Oooooooooo yes it does pique my intrest
  19. CoderDrag0n8
    Cause after that one dude patented FTL travel and created the biggest wealth inequality ever, I am now so poor I cannot afford food. Therefore, your leg. Heyyyyy gimme back my FTL patenting turtleeeeeeeee
  20. CoderDrag0n8
    Listen, my point is not that Pluto should be a planet (although it is very cool and think it should be but that's an opinion and only relevant in my hidden Pluto fanfics) my point is that by the current definition, Pluto is a planet, and I don't see how the definition disproves it's planetary status Yes, but the point of defining something is too change a subjective term we made up into a clearly defined term that we made up, but still has no argument between what does and doesn't count. I'm just saying, I think the point of defining something is making it less subjective, and so if the definition fails in making it less subjective, than the definition failed! My argument is: Based on the current definition of a planet, Pluto should be a planet, because of the ambiguity of the definition of planet, so therefore: I agree with Ksauce. But if we can't change the definition of a planet, THEN WE SHOULD STICK TO IT, AND NOT REMOVE PLANETS 'JUST CAUSE' If, according to the definition, we should have 50 planets, than we have 50 planets, and someone needs to change the definition, not "oh no, we'll just pretend these things don't count as planets and now we have a nice round number of 8!" I NEVER THOUGHT PLUTO HAD LIFE I just like hades
  21. CoderDrag0n8
    Literally how? There were already 9 planets before the change, and that didn't 'clutter' it too much! Also why are we using a subjective reason for a scientific term? Also why is a scientific term still subjective despite attempts to make it no longer subjective! That just means they did a bad job in defining it if it is still subjective!
  22. CoderDrag0n8
    Yes, so then why is it so hard to stretch that subjectivity to include something that in one sense of that term that you stated was subjective is a planet?
  23. CoderDrag0n8
    Yeah it's my biggest math pet peeve you can easily and simply express the +/- symbol with sqrt(x^2) unless you are trying to explain why it is sqrt(x^2) is the +/- symbol, in which you have to dig through the friggin unicode and find the = sign with a line through it or just go like +/- which is signifigantly more ambiguous. 95
  24. CoderDrag0n8
    Mmmm i hope I get elim ima RP in the elim doc so hard
  25. CoderDrag0n8
    @starling yep that doesn't exist
×
×
  • Create New...