I'll clarify and say I do not mean multiple games at once. What I am saying is that there are a group of people who alternate between running the games directly and giving advice from the background and playing it if they want to. That is what I am suggesting. Multiple at once would be insane and I do not think that the Hunger Games, as where it is rn, without an established community and way things have been run in the past, will be able to do that yet. YET. However, I do think that in a few years when we have more people here who really want to help run it and do it, that'll be the point where we can have multiple, such as with SE.
To continue the comparison with SE, SE is mainly Sanderson, but if someone wants to run a non-sanderson game, then they petition to the main people and can get approved for it (This is for any games whatsoever too.) My opinion is that they should be mainly Sanderson focused, but that we also do non Sanderson stuff every now and then to have some fun. Maybe we can mix in a few Non-Sanderson ones, maybe one or two a year to balance out with the rest of the Sanderson ones so that we have a break from the big lore stuff.
Yeah, but not everyone would play any given game. It'll be easier once we have more of an established community. A poll is a good idea, though. I myself do think that people would want to participate, though definitely not as much as for a Sanderson game. Using them as a breath of fresh air every now and then maybe could work better? And if people don't want to participate in those ones for whatever reason, then that is perfectly fine, at least from how I perceive it.