Jump to content

Gears

Members
  • Posts

    1046
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Gears

  1. People I actively want to lynch: Frozen Mint, Ventyl. People I would be okay with lynching: StrikerEZ, Vapor, The_Truthwatcher.
  2. It's mainly because Mint seems to be tunneling on TJ and we don't really have any good lynch targets. Ventyl, Mint, and TJ are the main ones, and no one is really voting on Ventyl. Fifth has some reasons, but the post was just lost, so give him a minute to summarize.
  3. If you wish to lynch me, you have my leave to make the attempt.
  4. I am amenable to lynching Frozen Mint or Ventyl.
  5. Oh, sorry. I missed it somehow.
  6. No, in the same post where you put your new vote. It's easier to find that way.
  7. You have to green out your previous vote. Use the same code to change it to red but use the word green instead.
  8. Dr. Gears knelt down next to the brown spot. "The soil appears to have been drained of vital nutrients and bacteria. This may be a side effect or a cause, as plants cannot grow in soil lacking nutrients."
  9. @Rushu42 @mathiau
  10. Corruption doesn't really matter to me, the Anarchist said. As long as it's a challenge.
  11. Last cycle, people started to post because I pinged everyone who didn't vote. Just go ahead and vote now, and you can always change it later.
  12. I don't think you're an elim, but I am nearly certain that no one else will agree. Mint's suspicion of you is something that I indeed find suspicious, and with no other opportune targets, I suppose I must vote Frozen Mint
  13. 12704346, 12704345, 12704344...
  14. Let us first assume the proposition that a victory is possible. Let us then assume that there is a way to achieve said victory. Premise 1: The last post wins. Premise 2: People want to win. Extrapolation: People will keep posting to try and win. Premise 3: The only way for an active thread to die is for a mod to close it. Extrapolation: A mod must close the thread for a winner to be determined. Premise 4: The mods like this thread. Extrapolation: The mods will not close the thread. Conclusion: A victory is impossible.
  15. So what you seem to be saying is that an elim needs to be a better villager than the villagers to avoid suspicion, and because I'm doing such a good job at explaining my reasoning and being consistent, I'm suspicious? Have I done too good of a job?
  16. I think that the problem is not with the gender itself, but with my distaste for pronouns, labels, and names in general. The Anarchist's gender exists, I just can't find the perfect label for it. E/em or ey/em are sort of a little better possibly, but they still clash somehow. As of right now, they/them, e/em, or just avoiding pronoun usage in general seems to be the best bet, but that still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth.
  17. Could you elaborate? Where exactly do you see evidence of a manipulating hand?
  18. I'm making a second character and I can't decide the gender. Quick overview: The Anarchist is a flamboyant individual who orchestrates the fall of empires in their spare time. Envision the most over-the-top colourful crazy person ever [like the Sixth Doctor but with a better fashion sense]. Has a cape, a tattered coat, knives, explosives, guns, a really nice hat, cool boots, and some fancy jewelry. May or may not have a significant other named Malcolm. Gender's always been more of a *confused helpless shrug* than an actual thing for me, but the Anarchist knows themself perfectly, down to the bone marrow, so I need this to be a certain thing, not a thing I stare at blankly hoping something makes sense. The they/them pronouns kind of work, but those also feel a little eh? to me, like words I've thrown at this character in hope that they stick. Help?
  19. Okay, sleepy villager. Thank you for clarifying.
×
×
  • Create New...