|TJ|
-
Posts
2245 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by |TJ|
-
What was all the coordinated protection between you, Wiz and Drake then?
-
Ahahahaha xD It's been a while since I've witnessed Stab Vote (TM) by Araris. This is hilarious. xD
-
Okay a quick summary since I've been out pls? If v!JNV, e!Mat ONLY if Mat is "Confirmed Good" elim. Else, it's v/v If e!JNV, then he could have lied about Mat being good and could have said the truth for village cred. If e!Mat, 100% e!JNV. Warning, we need to have 4 votes on a play to prevent a last minute hammer on Kas/Fifth if it was 3-3. Has both Aman's roles been proved?
-
bro. brooo. i legit once checked before typing. Target Scan, though now I'm not so sure it is? @StrikerEZ - Alignment Scan - oh yeah my bad >> there's no alignment smh xD
-
I wasn't talking about alignments scans actually. Rather, target scans and role scans. And even non-specific target role like Augur can track his actions. My point is, simply, his actions are accountable/trackable. I'd rather not use alignment scan on him, yeah.
-
Hold on, first off all, @StrikerEZ - is it possible for the Spiked to have Unsnapped in their team? Asking because it doesn't fit thematically. Hmmm, I donno if he intends to or not. But just by making the statement, he's painting a target on his back and inviting all the scans on him. Hypothetically, if I had any kind of scan, he'd be a good target for me any time after that.
-
I'm not sure I get this correctly, you're asking why wouldn't he lie to us about his role if he snaps? Well, now that he's revealed his snapping point, we would know if he's achieved it. And subsequently, there are multitudes of scans. In the end, we can hold him accountable for his actions each cycle. Like it'd be suspicious if he's seen visiting the NK target if he claimed a role like Rioter.
-
But I always have 1-2 strong village reads in D1/C1 though? Granted not as strong as this but I do tend to get strong v intuition in D1 about players. Re: I think Tuatara in the AG as just one of the examples And agreed about my vote not pressuring anyone which is why I'm showing there's barely any downside to getting TKN to 7 votes. Anyways, it's going to be obvious soon if it's going to happen or not so I do not intend to keep it there if it becomes obvious that we aren't going for that. Missed this edit. The post I quoted - Shows his whole thought process to outing his role.
-
I'm not hard-clearing him as village though, and obviously my read of him will depend of his subsequent actions. It's not a final judgement call. It's my read of him as of now. And the first step of reading is subsequent actions is to follow up on want he claims he wants and see his reactions to it. Which is why I do encourage players to vote for him. I need to reread rules to see if evil players can be UnSnapped though. If not, the worst thing that could happen is a villager could die accidentally, and the best thing to happen could be either [an elim playing risky game dies] or [a villager gains a power and is prevented from conversion]. There's only a small downside to getting him up to 7 votes. Wanna get TKN to 7 votes first :P. And if I don't have a better suspect by then, I will :P.
-
That particular statement I quoted was village, I cannot see an evil intention behind it, nope. TKN is a lot more assured and strong in statements when he's village and a lot more quieter when he's evil. I'm sorry you cannot not have a view on TKN when he says "I need 7 votes on me pls guys". There are soooo many ways it could go wrong and I've never seen TKN playing as a risky elim. - need 7 votes - makes himself accountable for possible future convert both points are strong village indicators. Also, my read of your post is that you are evil and you want to convert me but not before we threadbrawl so it that it's not obvious you converted me and doesn't appear e/e in the future :P.
-
Yeah, this is village. I can't see any elim motivation behind it. Wanting to gain 7 votes in D1 and possibly risking death in a game of 2-3 elims is not an optimal elim play. TKN
-
You know, Jak could be considered as a short of Jakub. And the Polish pronounce it as Yakub. So Jak = Yak
-
Sign me up as Jandro (pronounced like Alejandro) (sidenote: I've always pronounced Allomancer Jak as Yak :P)
-
yall really think that cycle was e/e/e? plus the revelation about confirmed villager was very villagery, c'mon. do look at jnv. and mat bcause of orloks eight.
-
bro read properly smh. i said that role is the only thing why i would consider v!silho, other than that they felt evil. i literally pushed e!silho early game.
-
i think vote manip for elims in a unflipped game is a tiny bit unbalanced which is the only reason im thinking v!silho. @aman you were wondering about tanis action in d5. but what if that could be justified by the possibility that steeldancer might not have actually copied the tieguy role and if they avoided the tie, then steel might not have to lie about using it and subsequently not get caught in the said lie.
-
Ah, so v!steel - 2e in Mat/Drake/Ash/Archer 2e in Mat/Drake/Ash/Biplet (+ Wiz/Aman) meaning at least 1 e in Mat/Drake/Ash edit - wait no opposite of se player is e!steel...
-
you read your sacred numbers upside down, i was 999, not 666 :P. also all the removed villagers, beware the parity hammer this cycle and be ready to use your final vote if that happens at eod.
-
i think e!jnv accurately said mat is village. and jnv-archer fits well because archer is the only pmer who confirmed it was possible to get alignment scans. no one else did.
-
lmao i called drake shooting me to kas last night. suppose I could have blocked him but eh, yall would have cried wolf for blocking the kill. i blocked ash last night and it gave the same result as n1 and n2. i roleblocked ashbringer. i think y'all need to turn your attention to jnv. I'm still sus of his scan on mat.
-
no my n1,n2 gm responses were distinguishably different from the n4 response. n1 - you roleblocked silhouette n2 - they kinda forgot to give the result so i had to prompt "mat was roleblocked?" and they confirmed that mat was roleblocked. n3 - action failed n4 - you attempted to roleblock sart me - ....and? what happened? you attempted to roleblock sart me - ?? also archer saw me visit mat n2 smh. edit: @Ashbringer, what exactly is the double exe ability? did you cause the double exe or was it steel who had an ability similar to yours?
-
bro i might have been confused but im definitely not wrong this time when i say i did not scan mat :P. that was jnv :P.
-
smh im so confused, i thought it was the other way around.
-
broski, we both were in steels tie guy. we were asked to sit out of orloks tie guy remember?
-
orlok, if youre village then you know there are 2 elims in your tie guy. irrespective of the possibility of e!steel giving false number of redscans to us (i actually do this is an e/e train rn), the 2 elims on the orlok tie guy (v!orlok world) are the either likely to be the ones forced to be on it by the virtue of being on the previous tie guy (ash, mat, and... drake?) or the ones who tried to break the tie in the closing stages and inadvertently ended up on the tie due to missing orlok vote and vote manip shenanigans. poe for this is i need to go back and check but its 2:30am and I just finished up with my work >> so @Orlok Tsubodai, id recommend your scan poe to be [ash, mat, drake] + [lads-doing-tie-breaking-shenanigans-only-to-shoot-themselves-in-the-foot (tba)]
