mathiau

Not Cosmere's best boy 1. This character is short 2. This character can shapeshift 3. This character is not from a shapeshifting race

No blood so it's definitely not a spike, though I don't see how it could be a soulstamp

Not the most destructive goddess of Stasis Edit: Not Omin 1. This character is short 2. This character can shapeshift

So, new character: 1. This character is short

Rua

Shallan

Wit

Sarene

What do you mean? I just went for the most stubborn character I could find

Shallan

Something I had missed the first time you did this joke but taking a Soulcaster off Roshar would probably be far harder than taking Kel off Scadrial

Ok Same reason why no one ever sees Venli when she peers into the SR, it's possible Renarin is just using very small amount of Stormlight too

And Gravtation fused to Adhesion. Also I don't remember Venli trying to use Stormlight to power her abilities in the Tower so it could have worked for her

Also, stopping to accept one of the truth you said

Oh it's much worse than you think It's likely Renarin won't be able to use S-Illumination, for Rlain I'm less certain, I'm still not convinced Tumi and Glys have the exact same nature

I disagree with that assumption. First there almost no chances combining Ruin and Odium will not create something even more dangerous and second there are more than one way to fuse to Shards, for example we know there's another possible combination of Ruin and Preservation called Discord. You fuse Honour and Odium in a way that use Honour to temper Odium but you could also fuse them in a way that use Honour to fuel Odium The spren with the least influence from Honour are Cultivationsprens, not Mistpsrens. And the fact Tumi was singing the Rhythm of War imply it's his Cultivation part that was transformed

Aarik

Thanks Please don't double post. Choosing not to change correspond to not using the Dawnshard, which is not something a Shard whose intent was base of a Dawnshard would do

To be fair it's likely she's not understanding the full scope of Change, but yeah it wouldn't be called Change if it was not about things changing Thanks I think this idea would be more fitting to a fusion of Honour and Autonomy than to just Autonomy

I've stated my points against Preservation being in Change multiple time in this discussion so I don't think stating them again will be of any use. I will instead ask you why you think they're wrong. Irreversibly, not destructively. Not that it matter to your point Other possible reasoning: giving something to someone change them Aren't these two idea basically the same? Honestly I'd like your theory far more if you had Preservation in Bind, Whimsy in Change and maybe Autonomy in Think (autonomy imply the ability think for yourself) That would be a great place for a Wisdom-ish Shard, yes. There's more to be Valorous than just a feeling of courage (is courage even a feeling? I thought it was about how you reacted to fear not about another feeling) so imo she could be in Feel as much as she could be in Think On the one hand if you're right about the name of the fourth Dawnshard being Bind, I disagree with this placement for the same reason I did to Preservation being in Change On the other hand if the Dawnshard known to Bind mortal and voidish creature has another name it's possible Autonomy would be one of it's aspects (see my argument for Autonomy being an aspect of Control in my last post) I don't remember that speech, when was that? Is not an part of Change, it can be a part of Bind, of Survive or of Endure, but not a part of Change Honestly Change is already a wide enough command without adding the "Don't Change" possibility

Hoid (also please avoid double posting)

Yeah, I would never have gotten it