Jump to content

The Young Pyromancer

Members
  • Posts

    2479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Young Pyromancer

  1. I meant I thought TGK was the Kanda kill, or at least I pretended that. Interesting. You know who the Tineye is?
  2. (Part the 33rd, in which the numbers return, as the Narrator was forced to attend a technology seminar) Confident Indecision Maker’s Avatar: Yeah. I realized this had the potential of being messy as soon as somebody made a joke about us having an elim doc, and I've been trying to be especially careful about avoiding any game talk in there after that. That said it has been quite helpful for coordinating splitting up the minutes. THE COFFEE MACHINE: Yeah, I had noticed that and immediately a record scratch went off in my head . The COFFEE MACHINE suddenly makes a record-scratch sound and the klaxons cease. The COFFEE MACHINE also wonders why his internal computer decided to autocorrect claxons to klaxons NOW, instead of FIVE POSTS AGO!!! The Intern: Which part next?! THE COFFEE MACHINE: The COFFEE MACHINE makes a sad whiring noise. Another SHOUTY-SHOUT AGENCY!!! member had been lost. And all (Mist) wondered was who would post next. The COFFEE MACHINE added extra flame retardant just in case Stick started to spontaneously combust. The Intern: Apologies!! EULOGIES are in order. I must draft them! (The rest of the page is filled with crossed out drafts of eulogies, written in the distinctive coffee-allergic hand of The Intern)
  3. I don't have the spike. I'm betting on a Kandra/Thief/Someone who got really lucky with lynches/An elim who's been carrying out the kills.
  4. Why would you think that? My point is even if he didn't there's no reason not to share. Just because he blocked someone doesn't mean they are necessarily going to be lynched. It's definitely not proof of a kill role, but it's something that can certainly swing a close decision, or provide someone to look into.
  5. You not speaking is more likely to put you on a kill list, so your info dies with you. Not speaking here makes no logical sense, and only benefits elims/Kandra. This is making me highly suspicious right now. The only motive I could see you having to keep this information secret is if you're an elim pulser who posted stuff in-thread, then got told to not reveal the info by your teammates. I'll withold my vote for now, but you've flipped my suspicions on you. Other analysis has cast you in a village light, So I'll wait to see other's input, but this right here is really weird to me. You claim to not want to be killed, whereas you're FAR more likely to be killed here as long as you keep the information secret. Your actions only make sense as an elim. Also, that's not how math works. It's not an 1/13 chance that you're wrong, it's a 4/13 (assuming 3 elims left, which I think[?] is the consensus number) that even IF you're wrong, the person you pick is an elim/the Kandra ANYWAYS. My info is less 'the Coinshot wasn't roleblocked' and more 'X was targeted by the Coinshot'. Removed identities here because it's not my info to give. @Lahilt, was that the right part? I think you might have skipped one. It says in roles when the user can store/tap after the description. In what way?
  6. I know the coinshot kill went through. That means it was the kandra. Reveal them to the thread Ash.
  7. Hm. Slight suspicion on Ash, for buying a spike, as the only person I've talked to with one role so far has been an elim. Think that TJ might be right about the extra elim, as single roles might be a good way to balance that out.
  8. First. It adds a drawback to the ability. They can move a vote around, but they lose their own.
  9. Finance is strictly better than Resource in almost all scenarios. I would suggest the Financier canceling their own vote, as that's standard in Allomantic setups.
  10. Gah, fine. Ventyl. Not sure why you didn't do anything before. Might be a kandra trying to fake things out here. EDIT: Flame On! Also, to clarify, I meant that as in trying to bluff via traps.
  11. Said I knew who has it, not that I have it. re: mechanics, I'm thinking of putting together a mechanics PM, to try and work something out. Will try and set up some sort of verification. Comment/PM if interested.
  12. That's a promise that you probably won't. I'm saying the pun might remove any possibility of it not happening.
  13. ...You miiight want to scroll through the comment on the elim doc before you make any promises
  14. Fine. I need to work on my social analysis anyways.
  15. There's been so much inactivity this game it's really hard to root out elims; lowering the bar for activity makes it easier for elims to hide. Right now, I think the best path to victory here is coming up with some kind of mechanical method to victory. I'll look over the roles and try to figure something out. @Elandera, you seemed good with mechanics. Care to help?
  16. Magestar’s one of my top kandra suspects, so if the vote swings their way, I’d be fine with that.
  17. Orlok said he would ensure my death in the next game we played, regardless of our alignments.
  18. If I join this game, does the 'killing regardless of our alignments' still apply?
  19. Mhm. The rules weren't very clear, and the fact that striker didn't correct me with the 'updating successor' bit was weird.
  20. Striker refused to specify if he could update his successor. I think that's likely, so odds are on Mage/Elandera. Also, recall how he was in the running for the lynch several times. That makes him picking a successor, even if he's unable to change it, relatively likely. EDIT: Flame On!
  21. Hm. The issue with using the same person to kill everyone is if that person becomes the Kandra. I'd say that the elims are probably going to be cautious until the Kandra flips, so I'm tempted to keep Magestar and Elandera alive as long as possible, considering they're the two most likely Kandras.
×
×
  • Create New...