Jump to content

MacThorstenson

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2846

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by MacThorstenson

  1. MacThorstenson
    It specifies when rules are in effect, not necessarily when they are passed. And while they have very similar functions, they have slightly different definitions and thus the voting clause has no claim on rules that have been passed and thus are applied to Normic
  2. MacThorstenson
    See my edit: So you have indeed passed that rule into effect.
  3. MacThorstenson
    Macthorsten's government increase of efficiency proposal: This vote only needs the support of one other person to be passed. The first person to support this rule besides me gets the ability to cut any number of the rules on the waiting list in a one time purge. EDIT: I should add for clarification that this rule supersedes the voting cause rule by virtue of saying so, and that the voting clase rule never specifies what authority is required for a rule to supersede it.
  4. MacThorstenson
    You know, we need to figure out a way to either decrease the amount of backlog, or make the voting more efficient. Any suggestions?
  5. MacThorstenson
    I am voting for the above rules
  6. MacThorstenson
    And you still think its legit right? Cuz it definitely is
  7. MacThorstenson
    I would propose a few rules for clarification and organization to damnation if I break any currently standing rules: Mac's First rule of organization: For a rule to make it onto the list of rules that can be considered (the waitlist), someone needs to propose it, and another person needs to second it. Mac's Second rule of organization: There is a list of 15 rules that can be voted on at any given moment (the waitlist), regardless of how many rules have been submitted and seconded. Mac's third rule of organization: Rules are divided into categories based on what they cover. Examples could include: Acquisition, Removal, or Transfer of eggs, Fun things (E.X. rule 15). Player rules (like the rule of inactivity). There is no limit to the amount of categories, but people should make an honest effort to try to fit rules into categories.
  8. MacThorstenson
    Yeah. We apologize for the inconvenience, but the RP will be deleted at midnight EDT. Yeah! It's awesome.
  9. MacThorstenson
    Happy belated birthday. Congrats old sport! Also Hi @Archer
  10. MacThorstenson
    I support this rule.
  11. MacThorstenson
    Oops yeah missed that. Your character is still good.
  12. MacThorstenson
  13. MacThorstenson
    I don't support meta's rule and instead offer this rule: The not internally consistent rule: No rules have to be consistent with anything. Even themselves.
  14. MacThorstenson
    The days don't match up. I'm seeing that its March 20th right now. EDIT: We are using the Julian calendar right?
  15. MacThorstenson
    I will give him the OK. First oath is -5 Second oath is -30 You don't give a third oath, but the muteness is -25 easily. You are OK.
  16. MacThorstenson
    I take offense at this. There have been way more than three millenniums. I don't think that anyone argues that the universe began at 0 AD.
  17. MacThorstenson
    Nonsense. Nothing out of the usual going on.
  18. MacThorstenson
    shshshshshshs.
  19. MacThorstenson
    EDIT: The below post was a prank, but it is now a serious proposal at this link: Prank below: Due to the large amount of activity and members that this RP has, the mod team has decided that it is time to move ourselves to a different venue. We will be able to appoint our own mods, have a spreadsheet to efficiently sort characters, and quite a few more features that will allow us to have a more fun and enjoyable RPing experience. Here is the link to the website: http://AlleyverseRP.com/forum We encourage everyone to start making accounts and complete the transition as soon as possible because we will be deleting this subforum in about 4 hours.
  20. MacThorstenson
    See my edit EDIT read that wrong ok
  21. MacThorstenson
    Please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe all of these are in violation of rule 15? EDIT: The dog picture won't load, and I am just seeing voiduses cats so ignore the first two. EDIT 2: Also need to call UNO!
  22. MacThorstenson
    I propose a Taxation rule: The US tax code applies in its entirety to all points gained in whatever manner. I also propose the spikes rule: Spiking newcomers in the Intro thread gives the spiker 100 points. This rule applies retroactively. I will get around to voting on everything tonight.
  23. MacThorstenson
    @Dr. Dapper I will need to revisit that, but depending on what the oath of non combatentness is he could still be OP. I completely agree with kenod that a Warner bond isn’t all that limiting to a chRCter. I haven’t been keeping up too closely with the character, I haven’t had time, so non of this is an official mod ruling yet, but generally warder bonds aren’t good weaknesses.
  24. MacThorstenson
    Mac paused at the door. His training. His one hardship. It was the one thing that could incapacitate him, the one thing that could hurt him in the alleys, and it couldn't hurt him unless he used it. Did he want to push through? Could he push through? His face hardened with determination. Yes. Mac turned around to address Voidus, his face displaying no indication of the internal struggle "I think I am." I hope I am.
  25. MacThorstenson
    @Voidus
×
×
  • Create New...