Arraenae
-
Posts
1873 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Arraenae
-
Hello! I am Arraenae, your interpreter to this mysterious and exotic language of Burnt Spaghetti. "Bah" indicates medium to low annoyance. Repetition of the letter "a" is likely do to keyboard-mashing on the part of a very grumpy Burnt Spaghetti. "Hrmm" and all variations indicate thinking. The more "m"s at the end, the more thinking Burnt Spaghetti is doing. Thus, "hrmmm" indicates more thought than "hrmm". The variation "huhrm" is a very difficult sound to make, and thus is more commonly used in written Burnt Spaghetti than spoken Burnt Spaghetti. This indicates self-consciousness and the desire to write aesthetically different words. "Huhrm" is often used in conjunction with multiple "hrmm"s. The grammar structure of sentences in Burnt Spaghetti is similar to a truncated sentence in English. When referring to oneself in Burnt Spaghetti, the subject of the sentence is dropped. The dotdotdot structure, formally known as the ellipsis, is a common sentence structure in Burnt Spaghetti. Dotdotdots are often uses to express a medium-length pause, or the end of a line of thought. In this case, the dotdotdot structure is used as the former. This has been your daily interpretation of Burnt Spaghetti. Thank you for listening, and have a good day. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
-
Emphasis mine. Your scans only confirm "not elim assuming no outside interference", not villagerness. I already promised protection to someone else. Sorry about that.
-
Thank you! -
-
Stink gets the crazy role. Fitting. What should we do with Kipper, assuming that his role really is what he says it is? I'd rather not protect him every Night to save him from any eliminator who might potentially want to kill him. Just because Aman claims that Kipper claimed a certain ability and win con doesn't mean that's Kipper's actual ability and win con.
-
Kipper. SilverDragon. When SD first posted about not PMing Kipper, I thought the tone of their post felt a little forced, but I voted on Kipper to encourage elaboration. Kipper has elaborated now, and I believe him a little more than SD.
-
Applies to both writing and drawing. Sometimes you just want to know how to draw a properly realistic bloodstain. Other times you want to know the best way for your character to brutally murder another character.
-
Lopen, those evil reads on me from other people might have been because I was deliberately trying to play as if I was a Neutral Beggar. I thought that if I was convincing enough, I might get someone to ask me to take the role and alignment of their dead eliminator teammate, or something similarly incriminating. Then I thought I'd caught an eliminator, and infodumped everything in my PM with Silverblade to Aman. I also told him I was a villager. He wasn't convinced that SB was an eliminator (even accused me of having a win con of lynching a specific player). Then Silverblade voted on me, so I dumped everything inthread and stopped with the Neutral act.
-
Can you elaborate on the shadiness part?
-
Kipper. I'm putting this vote on until I get an explanation. @Kipper, I know you're not on right now and you're still mod-queued, but I'd like to hear what you have to say about this. Somebody is lying here.
-
Sometimes, an eliminator will save a villager to get in that villager's good graces. Or maybe two villagers are up for the lynch and they just don't care who gets lynched, as long as somebody dies. Aman himself has admitted to using this strategy multiple times.
-
Why would the Philosopher definitely have targeted Aman? Maybe they were blocked. Maybe they have better targets. Maybe they don't want to see Aman dead, if you go by one of Lopen's conspiracy theories.
-
You really, really want him dead...
-
Kipper, what happened in your PM with SD?
-
That's good. At least I don't have to worry about whether you "scanned" him as elim to save yourself or whether you actually scanned him. If Lopen isn't an eliminator, he's not trying to kill you because you're a threat to his team. That gives his accusations a little more credibility. The problem is, I still have some gut trust of you, so the headache of whether you're lying or Lopen is lying has now changed to whether I trust Lopen or my gut more. Lovely.
-
Let's see if this ginormous post-in-making can go through without being gobbled up by the refresh monster. I hope I don't get ninjaed. I've looked through D4 again, and some things are jumping out at me. Aman points out the possibility of Ren being a villager "who made his suspicions immediately known in public without knowing all the details." He compares Ren to Lopen, who "said he thought the same thing when he read it, but just confined those thoughts to PMs." I assume that you meant that if Ren was a villager, he should have done what Lopen had done and just mentioned his theory in PMs. I'm pretty sure there's a post where you express suspicion of Lopen for expressing that theory in PMs. However, I can't find it now. It's possible that I'm misremembering things. If that post does exist, could someone link it please? I remember thinking that contradicted the post above where Ren was suspicious because he posted his theory inthread. You accuse Len of not caring who gets lynched. All Len said was "I'm with Rae here, Renegade. I have a few suspicions about Aman, but Orlok has corrorborated his story so far. If you can punch a hole in it and prove that Aman has lied, I'm more than happy to switch my vote." That doesn't sound like someone who doesn't care where the lynch goes, that sounds like someone open to new evidence. Isn't that a good thing? Villagers who won't change their suspicions when new evidence comes along are usually considered "tunnellers." This is the vote that made a tie. If Aman is village, I'm betting that SD is an eliminator/philosopher. If Aman is an eliminator, I'm betting that SD isn't on his team. It seems weird that SD is susicious of all three major accusers of D4. I can understand distrust of all of them, and if-he-is-village-he-is-evil type of reasoning, but not suspicion of all of them. Of course, this is all slightly muddled by SD's retraction four minutes before turnover.
-
Someone (Lopen, probably) attacked Aman. Aman, you better be grateful that I saved your sorry hide.
-
I did.
-
Silverdragon, why did you expect to die this Night?
-
Elbereth wrote a lovely description of me, so I decided to create a drawing to go with it.
-
-
From the album: An Inquisitive Fluff-Fluff
Elbereth wrote a lovely depiction of me, so I created a drawing to go with it. -
Aman. At least I trusted him before the massive JP die-off.
-
Protecting a Venture tonight. That's for sure.
-
The thing is, I'm not even sure who I'm protecting yet. I don't quite trust either Lopen or Aman. I'm tempted to do a coinflip, but Elbereth wouldn't be happy if I did something potentially game-changing because of a glorified RNG machine. Maybe that's enough of a reason to do it, to annoy her.
-
Hey, don't take it personally. I'm a suspicious person. Been like that since LG15b.
